Updated article on the site. After I posted that, he did email me.
Updated article on the site. After I posted that, he did email me.
LMAO - "Legs are hella sore but kept my 10:00 pace" - 6 months later runs 26 miles at 6:15 pace, right.
The Fap Scientist wrote:
LMAO - "Legs are hella sore but kept my 10:00 pace" - 6 months later runs 26 miles at 6:15 pace, right.
In a race where the results show him having run a 14 mpm pace.
The Fap Scientist wrote:
https://www.marathoninvestigation.com/2018/09/runner-lands-on-boston-entry-list-with-a-bogus-marathon-claim.htmlAbsolutely fail, claims he ran a 2:43 via negative split but he normally runs a 6:00 marathon and is actually pretty overweight.
It's amazing that people are oblivious to the fact that false marathons claims can easily be fact checked, as just about any race results are on-line. And of course with his body-type, it would be difficult to break 10:00 for a mile. His claim is about as believable as a 140-guy saying he put the shot 60 feet in college.
Looper10 wrote:
Course has a 10 mile loop that needs to be run twice. Probably planned this to just do it once and slip on in. Should've pleaded ignorance with respect to the loop when he had the chance...but since he gloated from day one and now that he's all in...this should be fun to watch.
This is exactly what he is going with. He posted on his personal FB page and in an email to me. Working on an update now.
I'm A okay with this guy getting negative press. He's demonstrated that he's completely okay with lying for his own gain. Good work, LetsRun.com readers.
Also - OP has the best name on LRC.
It's a shame MODs deleted my FAP science study threads.
And let me guess....the fancy watch in his race pic was malfunctioning or turned off?
But still - gloating he can carry anywhere from a 6:15 to a 7:00 pace? For the first time ever? And nothing seemed off about what is probably a 3+ hr PR? JD is delusional and scrambling.
doubler wrote:
Looper10 wrote:
Course has a 10 mile loop that needs to be run twice. Probably planned this to just do it once and slip on in. Should've pleaded ignorance with respect to the loop when he had the chance...but since he gloated from day one and now that he's all in...this should be fun to watch.
This is exactly what he is going with. He posted on his personal FB page and in an email to me. Working on an update now.
Ah there still has to be more to this...10 miles off is still in the 4:30 neighborhood (at a steady clip) no?
The Fap Scientist wrote:
https://www.marathoninvestigation.com/2018/09/runner-lands-on-boston-entry-list-with-a-bogus-marathon-claim.htmlAbsolutely fail, claims he ran a 2:43 via negative split but he normally runs a 6:00 marathon and is actually pretty overweight.
You out someone, but don't name them..............why?
Mal Content wrote:
The Fap Scientist wrote:
https://www.marathoninvestigation.com/2018/09/runner-lands-on-boston-entry-list-with-a-bogus-marathon-claim.htmlAbsolutely fail, claims he ran a 2:43 via negative split but he normally runs a 6:00 marathon and is actually pretty overweight.
You out someone, but don't name them..............why?
He was named throughout the article. And in the follow up.
Looper10 wrote:
doubler wrote:
This is exactly what he is going with. He posted on his personal FB page and in an email to me. Working on an update now.
Ah there still has to be more to this...10 miles off is still in the 4:30 neighborhood (at a steady clip) no?
there may have been a little more that could be cut. But it's possible he could have run a half at that pace.
LRC Get it Done wrote:
I really hope this guy comes out publicly more about this 2:43 he ran. If so, we need another 100K offer for him to run sub 2:45. We can get some folks on this board to even pace him, breaking 2 style. We can also merge this with the Kipchoge thread, but a different slant: how long can this guy actually run at 2:45 pace? Anyone think even 1 mile?
I'd bet $100 he couldn't break 30 mins for a 5k. Running sub 30 would at least indicate an awareness of pacing that should convince him how unbelievable 2:43 is. I find these cheats to be tremendously fascinating. There's something deeply psychologically wrong with them.
doubler wrote:
Mal Content wrote:
You out someone, but don't name them..............why?
He was named throughout the article. And in the follow up.
Not in the thread heading he wasn't. JD Greening has escaped scrutiny on Google.
Great thread. Good job everyone. Hate cheaters.
FTFY
Mal Content wrote:
doubler wrote:
He was named throughout the article. And in the follow up.
Not in the thread heading he wasn't. JD Greening has escaped scrutiny on Google.
According to Marathon Investigation - JD came forward and admitted he lied and didn't run a 2:43
GOOD JOB GUYS! GOT EMMMMMMMMMM!
Mal Content wrote:
The Fap Scientist wrote:
https://www.marathoninvestigation.com/2018/09/runner-lands-on-boston-entry-list-with-a-bogus-marathon-claim.htmlAbsolutely fail, claims he ran a 2:43 via negative split but he normally runs a 6:00 marathon and is actually pretty overweight.
You out someone, but don't name them..............why?
Because Derek is a loser who gets off on stalking women on social media. This time it happened to be a dude.
doubler wrote:
Mal Content wrote:
You out someone, but don't name them..............why?
He was named throughout the article. And in the follow up.
Derek forgot which account he was signed in as....LOLOLOLOLOL
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Clayton Murphy is giving some great insight into his training.
NAU women have no excuse - they should win it all at 2024 NCAA XC
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion