This is a really stupid standard. 2:15 is much faster than I have ever run or will ever run. As it 2:19. Would you call yourself "highly competitive" in the Berlin Marathon? Such descriptions are certainly informed by context. If I ran 16:00 in my local 5k, I could quite justifiably call that "highly copetitive" because it would be. Is 2:15 at Berlin highly competitive? He would be ~2.5 miles behind the winner. If I'm finishing 2.5 miles behind the winner in a marathon, that is not highly competitive. Good for him, though. He is still making money running. And that is a better time than I would have thought he could run at this stage of his career.
Chicknlegs wrote:
...tell ya what, you go run a 2:15:00 marathon. It will be then you have the room to make a negative comment like that. I've run a 2:19 and I can tell you that a 2:15:00 marathon takes immense competitiveness and focus to achieve. "Competitive at a high level" is exactly what a 2:15:00 marathon is.