I don't use vitriol with anybody but who are not able to read numbers, to discuss REAL facts, and are blind when we speak about doping and performances.
The numbers I wrote before are FACTS, not opinion, and only idiots can think that 3000 performance are ALL doped, before finding the first CLEAN performance. Also, 400 athletes, all doped, before the first CLEAN WR holder, is something that doesn't exist also in the mind of the most stupid people.
But, of course, when we show numbers and facts, or when we ask methodological question involving scientific answer (that nobody here is able to give), the reaction is "Canova is a liar", "Canova does it for money", "Canova abuses Kenyan", and so and so.
Of course I don't care about the attacks of people who never met me, doesn't know anything about myself, and fill their mouth with the most idiotic words. How my grandmother teached me, "You have to take words from where they come", and if I think somebody is a not honest idiot, simply I don't care.
But, instead escaping from the analysis of the real numbers, maybe better to try to review their FAITH in the effects of EPO.
How already I pointed out several times, I'm not a defender of doped athletes. On the contrary, I want them banned for longer time, and their results cancelled from the beginning of their career.
But one thing is to ask for a right punishment because you are against the ethic and wants to cheat, another thing to believe that doping can do advantages clearly out of every evidence.
Where the advantages are evident (for example, with steroids), I well know the effects of this type of doping. If there is no one WR in throwing, or in all the activity for women where the muscle strength is the most important factor, from 1988, this means that it's not possible, till now, to replace the effect on steroids on the performances with the most advanced training used today. And you can see how many top throwers were caught for doping in the past, and how much the performances decreased, when the antidoping against steroids became more effective.
But when we speak about long distances, the percentage of athletes caught by antidoping is really very small, and the most part of them are not for EPO, but for something else (Lucy Kabuu, the last, for morphine : somebody can explain me the effects of morphine as substance enhancing the performance ?).
But, of course, if you think that the clean WR are 4% slower than the official WR, you need also to think that ALL THE DOPED ATHLETES who had performances better than the WR were so smart to avoid the risk of the test, and African athletes are covered.
Probably is because they are covered that the athletes caught were Olympic Champions like Jemima Sumgong or Asbel Kiprop, or winner of the jackpot like Rita Jeptoo, or World Cross Country Champions like Chebet.
Probably is because the increased level of antidoping test that the performances of 5000m and 10000m continue to go down... Oh, sorry, this year in ONE race they were able to run 12'43" - 12'45" and 12'46", obviously they were "doped to the gill" but were covered by IAAF and by Haile Gebrselassie who was the first asking for jail for the Ethiopian dopers !
But, if in spite of the increased level of antidoping, the performances of Half Marathon and Marathon continue to improve, this is because the athletes of these events are allowed to take some drug, because absolutely is not possible they are not caught because are CLEAN !
How is it possible not understand that who thinks in this way doesn't have any logic, and only is FAITHFUL in the effects of doping, maybe because reads a lot of fake researches, without any practical clue ?
I know what is possible to do without any doping, and is not 4% slower than the official WR, but is the WR itself (maybe also better than the current WR, we wait some good new tomorrow).