I think the Bett case, along with previous ones (e.g. Kiprop) prove that the IAAF under Coe are serious about cracking down on doping and especially in removing the previous lack of equality between all nations. Of course it won’t be full proof and there will always be those that manage to evade detection.
There is still a long way to go, but the evidence from the past 2 years suggests that the Independent Integrity Unit’s work in drug testing is working and is successfully catching many of the cheats.
And I am not just talking about Kenya. We have seen Jamaica’s position as top sprinting nation been toppled the last couple of years; with many performers’ times dropping by about 0.2 in the 100m! Coincidence? Maybe, but I don’t think so.
Times in the distance events have also dropped quite significantly, and so has the sheer numbers in depth achieving such times.
I think most posters on here love (prefer) to criticise and accuse the sport’s governing body of wrongdoing; and indeed there has been good reason to do so under previous leaders; than to actually admit that they are on the right track (pardon the pun) and doing some good for the sport.
Personally, the testing improvements, the continued ban of Russia, the efforts to produce equanimity in some women’s events, and the crackdown on changing national allegiance, have all been welcome policies that will improve the sport in the long run.
As for Bett, it is of no relevance what his intelligence or attitude are, there is no excuse. He should be banned for 4 years and have his times and medals from past 12 months wiped from records. That would resonate strongly with those contemplating taking peds. He has cheated Kyle Langford from the opportunity of collecting a bronze medal at 21 at a home World Championships. The possible repurcussions of that moment not happening, are unquantifiable.