Another nail in the coffin
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/06/us/nfl-male-dancers-trnd/index.html
Another nail in the coffin
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/06/us/nfl-male-dancers-trnd/index.html
In my day, we didn't have professional dancers on the sidelines. People came to watch the damn game.
I just hope he makes 128% of what his female counter parts do.
Heaven forbid
Uncle Rico wrote:
In my day, we didn't have professional dancers on the sidelines. People came to watch the damn game.
But you did have cheerleaders...
PS: not sure why NFL have cheerleaders.
Based on all the recent stories it seems like something that has way more risk than reward.
This is much improvement, we need more progress like this.
Now we just need more women in coaching positions. No idea why this isn't already a thing.
plog wrote:
I just hope he makes 128% of what his female counter parts do.
1/.72 = 1.39
So 139%. Get your Liberal propaganda right!
DiscoGary wrote:
plog wrote:
I just hope he makes 128% of what his female counter parts do.
1/.72 = 1.39
So 139%. Get your Liberal propaganda right!
1/.61 = 1.64.
So, 164%. Get your Liberal propaganda right!
Gravy wrote:
Now we just need more women in coaching positions. No idea why this isn't already a thing.
It is a thing.
https://www.reviewjournal.com/sports/raiders-nfl/raiders/kelsey-martinez-strengthens-raiders-as-1st-female-assistant-coach/I don't understand why people would want to sit around and watch football.. Maybe they could go for a run instead.
Political correctness strikes again! Bad idea. I may be a liberal, but I'm also a realist.
Just get rid of ALL NFL cheerleaders. They are not needed and really have no interest in the team or game. They're just looking for acting, modelling, singing jobs anyway.
HRH wrote:
Another nail in the coffin
I don't know why you care, let alone why this is "another nail in the coffin".
the beagle wrote:
HRH wrote:
Another nail in the coffin
I don't know why you care, let alone why this is "another nail in the coffin".
This ^
Who gives a sh!t?
dontunderstand1 wrote:
I don't understand why people would want to sit around and watch football.. Maybe they could go for a run instead.
I attended one NFL game in my life. My team lost by 40 points and I loved every second of it. It's much better to watch in person than on TV. I was also sitting in the 3rd row so maybe that helped. I imagine those in the nosebleeds don't have as much fun. So yea, I'd rather watch a football game than go for a run. Especially when there is time for both in the same day.
In our great economy, decisions are made with the interests of equity holders in mind, not your emotions.
The owners likely got together (or appointed someone) and thought long and hard about whether this adds value to their investment. Maybe they thought this could improve the leagues image, or expand the universe of potential sponsors. Regardless, id put my money on the great capitalist decision makers over your message board whining.
Perhaps you should head over to Trump’s twitter feed to get your emotions pampered. Let the men make these decision.
But seriously, I can't wait to see Trump tweet about how men shouldn't be allowed to dance or how gay men are filth when the season starts. Luckily the seasons starts before midterm elections.
BLUE WAVE coming.
You think the NFL is dead?