Who still thinks 1969 moon landing is fake?

Polk County Florida wrote:

Come on man.

Everyone knows wrestlin's real and moonwalks 'r fake.

Chinese and Indian photos have shown the footprints and materials left behind by the astronauts many decades ago, and those folks had no interest in making the US look good. Case closed. Of course, the anti white SJW types led by the you know whos who are trying to wreck the West still cling to the fake mantra.

Sand Dunes wrote:

moranatang wrote:

What do you think those dots in the sky at night orbiting the earth are? spend 30 mins watching the night sky in the country side and you'll see a dozen satellites . You think those are a hoax?

I guess you've never heard of stars, wondering stars (what you call planets), comets and asteroids.

when was the last time you were out in a non-light polluted area and watched the night sky?

My guess is never if you are confusing the movement and appearance of a satellite in orbit with a planet or a comet? Seriously,........a planet?? You have never even gone satellite watching, have you?

Maybe time to get out away from the computer and observe the real world.

CrushSJW wrote:

Polk County Florida wrote:

Come on man.

Everyone knows wrestlin's real and moonwalks 'r fake.

Chinese and Indian photos have shown the footprints and materials left behind by the astronauts many decades ago, and those folks had no interest in making the US look good. Case closed. Of course, the anti white SJW types led by the you know whos who are trying to wreck the West still cling to the fake mantra.

90% of nutso-conspiracy theorists are right wing

yawntown wrote:

morangatang wrote:

so what you are saying, in short, is that you can't explain it.

I watched one of your videos already and found it worthless. Why waste time on another? I want to hear it in your own words.

If you can explain it then I will watch the video.

I have hunch you don't even understand the nonsense you spout.

He can’t explain it in his own words.

Ok. Let's start with the basics:

Bodies of water do not curve.

Water always seek its flatness

Water cannot flow uphill

The horizon always rises to eye level no matter what elevation you reach

With the use of high powered NON-FISHEYE lenses, objects that seemingly drop below the horizon with the naked eye come back into view.

Laser tests have been performed over lakes, rivers, ans oceans which have debunked the so-called earth curve calculator of 8 inches per mile squared.

These are all characteristics of a flat plane. Earth is not a ball, get over it.

Legit question wrote:

yawntown wrote:

He can’t explain it in his own words.

Ok. Let's start with the basics:

Bodies of water do not curve.

Water always seek its flatness

Water cannot flow uphill

The horizon always rises to eye level no matter what elevation you reach

With the use of high powered NON-FISHEYE lenses, objects that seemingly drop below the horizon with the naked eye come back into view.

Laser tests have been performed over lakes, rivers, ans oceans which have debunked the so-called earth curve calculator of 8 inches per mile squared.

These are all characteristics of a flat plane. Earth is not a ball, get over it.

and exactly how does this answer the question about Polaris not being visible from the southern hemisphere?

morangatang wrote:

Legit question wrote:

Ok. Let's start with the basics:

Bodies of water do not curve.

Water always seek its flatness

Water cannot flow uphill

The horizon always rises to eye level no matter what elevation you reach

With the use of high powered NON-FISHEYE lenses, objects that seemingly drop below the horizon with the naked eye come back into view.

Laser tests have been performed over lakes, rivers, ans oceans which have debunked the so-called earth curve calculator of 8 inches per mile squared.

These are all characteristics of a flat plane. Earth is not a ball, get over it.

and exactly how does this answer the question about Polaris not being visible from the southern hemisphere?

Water doesn't curve, so explain the ocean's on the globe model?

Legit question wrote:

Ok. Let's start with the basics:

Bodies of water do not curve.

Water always seek its flatness

Water cannot flow uphill

The horizon always rises to eye level no matter what elevation you reach

With the use of high powered NON-FISHEYE lenses, objects that seemingly drop below the horizon with the naked eye come back into view.

Laser tests have been performed over lakes, rivers, ans oceans which have debunked the so-called earth curve calculator of 8 inches per mile squared.

These are all characteristics of a flat plane. Earth is not a ball, get over it.

+1

no not really wrote:

Sand Dunes wrote:

What? Because I look into sh%t I'm crazy? All I'm saying is look into it.

https://youtu.be/qkAv1oyToWk

No, but it does mean you're a paranoid moron.

Name calling is NOT an argument. Present evidence to counter the flat earth, please. People like you are victims of "scientism."

Scientism is theoretical science which have no actual proofs (except in mathematical equations) but are purely speculative. And the speculative is littered with a lot of propaganda which has taken over the observable and rational science which we can test, see, hear and smell.

Flat earthers have done countless experiments to back up the Flat earth theory. You can find these experiments and tests all over youtube. What have ball earthers done to prove their position? Nothing- they only parrot what they have been indoctrinated with and hurl insults. That's not good enough.

Try harder, ball believers.

WOW, this thread explains a lot about the posters on this message board.

Sand Dunes wrote:

morangatang wrote:

and exactly how does this answer the question about Polaris not being visible from the southern hemisphere?

Water doesn't curve, so explain the ocean's on the globe model?

So what you are saying is that you can't explain the answer to the Polaris question in your own words....

Why would you expect people to spend time to explain to you why your dip shlt theories are garbage when you won't even answer a simple question.....anytime you nuts/trolls are shown to be wrong you just throw a bunch more garbage out as smoke screen.

It's very simple....if you can't answer the Polaris question in your own words then you are simply a troll or an easily duped fool who depends on random youtube videos to argue a point they don't even understand themselves.

if you want to continue the discussion, answer the Polaris question yourself, otherwise I'm not wasting anymore time.

Legit question wrote:

yawntown wrote:

He can’t explain it in his own words.

Ok. Let's start with the basics:

Bodies of water do not curve.

Water always seek its flatness

Water cannot flow uphill

The horizon always rises to eye level no matter what elevation you reach

With the use of high powered NON-FISHEYE lenses, objects that seemingly drop below the horizon with the naked eye come back into view.

Laser tests have been performed over lakes, rivers, ans oceans which have debunked the so-called earth curve calculator of 8 inches per mile squared.

These are all characteristics of a flat plane. Earth is not a ball, get over it.

The ancient Greeks knew the Earth was curved. This has been settled science for nearly 2,500 years. All it takes is two sticks and a brain. No fisheye lenses required. They also knew that there were stars you could see in the Southern hemisphere that you couldn't in the Northern and vice versa.

Bodies of water take the shape that gives the water the least gravitational potential energy possible. Since gravity drags things toward the center of the Earth, bodies of water follow the curve of the earth. A middle school kid could tell you that.

Who stands to benefit from a 2,500 year old conspiracy like this? Or does believing the Earth is flat make your otherwise pointless, boring life seem fun? Do you just want to feel special, like you're in on some secret that obviously nobody else is? Or are you really just that dumb?

I am amazed at how little understanding of very basic science this website has, and to be honest I'm not sure it's possible to explain this to you if you are truly this stupid. If you people can't understand this then the US is totally fvcked.

Appeal to tradition. Because x has been believed for thousands of years does not make x true. Also, ad hominem is not a argument. Name calling is not a argument.

wut???? wrote:

CrushSJW wrote:

Chinese and Indian photos have shown the footprints and materials left behind by the astronauts many decades ago, and those folks had no interest in making the US look good. Case closed. Of course, the anti white SJW types led by the you know whos who are trying to wreck the West still cling to the fake mantra.

90% of nutso-conspiracy theorists are right wing

How about you present a defense of your position instead of insults?

and avoiding every single question isn't an argument either

Appeal to youtube. Because x has been made into an animated graphic in a youtube video and passed out like candy on conspiracy message boards does not make x true.

1) Not appeal to tradition. Pointing out that we have known something to be true for a long time is not appeal to tradition. If I said something like "The earth is round because we've always believed it is" instead of "we proved the Earth is round 2,500 year ago because it's easy and you can do it too" that would be appeal to tradition. After you pick up a science textbook, can I recommend an intro logic book?

2) That wasn't ad hominem. For it to be ad hominem I would have had to say something like "You're wrong because you have red hair." It was a personal attack and it is true.

3) There is plenty of scientific argument in there that you can't dispute and you know it. For example " They also knew that there were stars you could see in the Southern hemisphere that you couldn't in the Northern and vice versa" and "Bodies of water take the shape that gives the water the least gravitational potential energy possible. Since gravity drags things toward the center of the Earth, bodies of water follow the curve of the earth."

Actually, the ancients believed in a flat earth model as evidenced by their depictions. Again, you are hurling insults. If you can't even get your "story" about the ancients accurately, then why should anyone believe what you have to say?

'response' post featuring dubious youtube links in 3....2.....1....

moran detector goes Beep! Beep! wrote:

and avoiding every single question isn't an argument either

Speaking of avoiding...

I'm not a flat earther, and I have always believed in the moon landing, etc. But, it is videos like this that make me ask "why don't they just stop, get it done, and say "there... you happy?"