Sarah who? wrote:
Didn't Tuohy run a 9:05 earlier this year? Jeez, she would have crushed this field and the CR.
Stairs wrote:
Sarah Healy, born Feb. 13, 2001, is 18 months older than Katelyn Tuohy, born Aug. 15, 2002. Katelyn at 15 years old has run 3000 m outdoors in 9:09.71 and indoors in 9:05.26
Just Sayinnn wrote:
Katelyn Tuohy is better
trollism wrote:
Just Sayinnn wrote:
Katelyn Tuohy is better
Why do you keep replying under different usernames?
Just Sayinnn wrote:
Relax dude this is my first time replying to this thread. I’m just pointing out that there’s no reason for a thread to be made about this girl for a (relatively) mediocre accomplishment. Great, she beat some girls and ran an ok time. When she runs sub-9 for 3K get back to me.
Special wrote:
64 second last lap.
Go, Laura! wrote:
Sarah Healy is very impressive. Physically she doesn't look as if she has an advantage over the other girls - it looks like she hasn't hit the gym yet and she's not particularly tall. So, I'd say a lot of her advantage is pure talent rather than physically maturing earlier than other girls.
This was just her 2nd race at 3000 and both times she has just raced for the win (here in Gyor she has the 1500 final still to come). Clearly she could go significantly faster at the moment, 8:55 perhaps?
With 2:02 & 4:09 at the shorter distances maybe they're her better distances though.
