Subway Surfers wrote:
ex-runner wrote:
Really not a valid point by any stretch of the imagination.
Drug use across the men's and women's sports can be assumed to be equal.
Caster isn't stopping her.
Actually it was either RJM or Clerk that posted either East German or Soviet analysis that anabolic steroids had a significantly greater enhancement on female performances than male equivalent events for the simple fact men already have testosterone.
As for Semenya not depriving her, incorrect, this person at a championship missed out on time by one spot and both Caster and Wambui were completing. If we go back to say 1970 the male WR was Snell's 1:44.3 on grass (probably 1:43 on synthetic tracks) while the female record was 2:00.5. Now this probably wasn't the best a female could do then but nonetheless females have improved 7s while men less than 2.5s, all during a dirty period.
The point you're trying to prove goes against all available evidence. Women's sport in general lags far behind men's sport, the women's 800m was banned until 1960. Clearly not a fair comparison to include the Snell period.
Again, 10 women ran under 2:00 in the Paris DL and 9 of them ran under 1:59.4.
4 were under 1:58. I don't understand why you are ignoring this fact. For you to think 2:00 is a super elite time simply means you don't watch the sport much.
A girl won a BMC race in 1:59 this year out front by herself. It's not anything like 1:44.
1:54 is a time not possible for most women, it's like 1:40 for men. But 1:57 is like 1:43 and 2:00 is 1:46.
Is your point literally that all women under 2:00 are dopers but your club mate isn't and your club mate should therefore be in the finals at major events? If she ran 1:58 she wouldn't be missing out by any spots.