Seyta wrote:
sleazazar wrote:
Sorry brother I’m out and about. Research it and if you’re incapable of finding it I will post it later. There was a whole thread here on it.
That investigation has been going on for years, and they haven't even managed to find one piece of usable evidence. This is even with leaks being made left and right by Fancy Bears, who are TRYING to make western athletes look bad.
If accurate and unadulterated, this interim report is to a medical board and was written by the agency involved with Lance eventually admitting to doping (after multiple years of denials, passed tests ["no evidence"], and investigation). Read the entire report, there appear to be multiple pieces of usable evidence... thus the report. I'm guessing that Ritz (Magness too) falls under whistleblower status in spite of potential anti-doping rule violations.
If Linden is uncomfortable with Hanson's supporting Ritz, that's not unreasonable. Shalane Flanagan has said something similar regarding NOP athletes "I think it's really important to consider who you associate yourself with. We don't get to choose our parents but we certainly get to choose our friends and our coaches and who we want to include in our circle and put our trust in. I think that who you choose to allow in says a lot about you. That's where I stand,". Even if unfair to Ritz, who has cooperated with USADA, his past may be a burden he has to live with.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B12sfJ8SraVNTW9nU3puUklyRzQ/view