No, I'm not. Molly is great. She won a national championship! When I was competing she would have beat me in a marathon and we would have been right by each other in a 5k/10k! If she was at her best I would have had to be at mine to avoid getting beaten by her. I fully admit all that and aren't trying to trivialize anything.
I'm merely saying that rojo's heading, "My god Molly Huddle is good. 66 days after Boston she runs a 4:38 final 1600 to win her 4th straight 10k title" is way out of proportion for what she actually did.
He should edit it to say, "My god Molly Huddle is good. She runs a 4:38 final 1600 to win her 4th straight 10k title". Problem solved.
Running like 90 seconds off a 10k personal best 66 days after a marathon isn't impressive. A 4:38 final close is I guess. I would assume this was nothing but a 5 mile tempo for her with a fast close.
And I wouldn't have run Boston this year. I hated the two marathons I did so I never did another one!