Your argument doesn't parallel the Johnson brothers' argument at all.
so again.. it is OK to allow them to CHEAT by drinking while underage but not ok to allow them to cheat at athletics? and that is called ethics???
i asked in the beginning... how many ncaa athletes would test positive for marijuana? why is that any dift from this situation? it is not, pure and simple.. you need to convolute any argument into 'ethical' or 'morality plays' to even try.
far more college age kids will die or become ill from drinking than from any PED use so why are we not testing athletes for alcohol? wouldnt that be the Ethical or Moral thing to do?
Eat your words, punk. How do they taste?
Setting it straight wrote:
You silver spooned boys can have all you petitions and polls, but in the end, the kid is still going to run. And that's the bottom line.
Maroon, it is back because the IAAF recently upheld Mullings LIFETIME BAN.
I love letsrun, but i think bringing this thread back for no reason at all is probably one of the dumbest things i've ever seen a site do...