Biological boys go 1-2 at girls state finals in Connecticut... awkward finish (video)

They looked pretty salty to me haha.

I used to know one who was really good at running the stairs at home -

http://houseofretro.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/psycho44.jpg

jeff tallon wrote:

i dont really know what to think,about it.i say,good on them,for being fast,and having a go,but im not sure where its all gonna end.i dont think transgenders will rewrite the record books,because there isnt enough of them to totally dominate sport.

All it takes is a small group of transgender runners to totally re-write the records. As it was pointed out earlier theres a couple of girls in the country who run under 4:50 in the 1600. Theres thousands of boys who can do that easily. If one transgender in a state decides to enter, its over.

markschultz2018k wrote:

Ultimately it's up to the citizens of Connecticut to show some backbone.

Teams can protest as well by not allowing their girls to compete in the races featuring the boys.

It's not like their athletes will be missing out on anything since they won't be placing where they should anyway.

The media should present the actual girls with a first place trophy. It wouldnt be unprecedented. The news media has a history of declaring national champs in sports or boxing decisions for championship matches. It's time some type of organization with clout starts ignoring the state sports associations that allow transgenders in the meets, and awarding biological females with titles , ie "state's best female 100m athlete"

I dont want to bash these transgender kids too much because they have no say so in the decisions of the high school sports administration who lets them in the races. They cant let themselves in - the people who run the sports allow it, and those same gutless administrators are cowards who are ruining girls sports.

I should have done this back in 2006. I was pretty solid in my events but I now know I could have been a world record holder in the 600m through 10,000m on the track. I also would not be working a dead end over taxed career because I would have saved up enough money from my 5 world marathon major wins and my Olympic Titles to retire. I would owe it all to the fact that I wasnt satisfied with being decent but wanted to be great and the fact that EPO is illegal but dressing up like a girl is not is what got me there. When they asked me today why I was back in men's clothing my response would be I only felt feminine on the track all the beatings I took in men's competition is what put me in women's clothing. But on the wealth womens competion got me made me a man again.

We've gone beyond all reason to accommodate these folks with gender dysphoria. I am unable to call these boys "girls" simply because they say it is so, and I am certainly not willing to accept boys posing as girls competing with girls. Sorry, but I choose to side with "biological realism" rather than worry about how "history" will judge me. Title IX was put in place to give women certain protections, not to allow men to masquerade as women and claim the rights of women. Unbelievable, this is.

Is there an organization which has formed to combat this gross transgression against women's rights? A quick google search unsurprisingly yields nothing.

However, I did find this website, which provides a convenient list of mayors which we may want to turn our attention to:

https://www.mayorsagainstlgbtdiscrimination.org/

This. +1, very well said.

not gibberish.im a much better writer,and typist,than you.

At least for ages 15+, what if we instead of gender divisions have "testosterone classes": above versus below 100 ng/dL. It'd be exactly the same as dividing by biological sex, but the label would acknowledge that we are doing this based on biology not gender. We keep PC labels but also fairness.

runnersworld1983 wrote:

At least for ages 15+, what if we instead of gender divisions have "testosterone classes": above versus below 100 ng/dL. It'd be exactly the same as dividing by biological sex, but the label would acknowledge that we are doing this based on biology not gender. We keep PC labels but also fairness.

Again, though, someone who developed as a male already has an advantage based on skeletal development. A six foot tall guy is still going to have a massive advantage over biological females even if he decreases his testosterone.

How about just acknowledging that accepting trans people doesn't mean that we have to let them run as whatever sex they want? I love you and accept you, now go run against everyone else who has testicles. That really isn't too harsh.

You had me going until the whole "women don't achieve in athletics due to the patriarchy" or whatever it was you said about a sexist society.

9/10

I think most sane people know that transgenderism is a mental illness (akin to wanting to cut off one's legs due to body dysmorphic disorder), that Caster Semenya's case is an incredibly difficult one with no bearing on the transgender question, and that no amount of Newspeak like cisgender or genderqueer can make a circle square.

I've changed my mind. I identify as a dog, and am going to enter the next local dog show as a hairless mastiff. Any of you who snicker at me are guilty of cis-species bigotry.

You, yes you, are the reason why Trump is going to get re-elected as president in three years.

Yeah, you heard it here first.

if you say "cis white privilege" you immediately become a joke to anyone other than the few who are as mentally handicapped as you are.

notalibtard wrote:

ProudSnowflake wrote:

People like you who can’t accept transgender individuals are on the wrong side of history. You were wrong about gay marriage just like you were of interracial couples

Check your cis white privilege at the door and understand that you’re no different than the racists of old.

if you say "cis white privilege" you immediately become a joke to anyone other than the few who are as mentally handicapped as you are.

He's just trolling in case you didn't notice

Trust me - I'm a HS teacher and around kids this age every day - and the look on the girls' faces after the race says 'whatever', 'idc' or 'what a knucklehead' at the "winner." This is such a f'in joke.

ProudSnowflake wrote:

At what point do you transphobes not understand that they’re not men they’re women.

Transgender need our acceptance not your hatred and bigotry.

I'll understand they are women when they have the same DNA as my mother or they give birth. When will you accept that the science hasn't changed? If s many people think they are women, why do so many people call them a tranny?

BTW. Because someone is ignorant of the science it does not make them a racist or phobic.

runnersworld1983 wrote:

At least for ages 15+, what if we instead of gender divisions have "testosterone classes": above versus below 100 ng/dL. It'd be exactly the same as dividing by biological sex, but the label would acknowledge that we are doing this based on biology not gender. We keep PC labels but also fairness.

Something like that *could* work. But as another poster has said, but the time you've decided you're a girl, by 15 the testosterone is already cranking, and the cis-boys are just bigger. I also *guess* that boy DNA just makes boys bigger ( eg it's not just estrogen v testosterone)

Which would mean to be fair to the other 99.99% of girls, the cis-boys would have to start being a tranny and have decided by 10 or 11 or so, which is even more insane.

Exactly. Sports are separated between men and women for a reason. The sex (biology) of the athlete must determine which race they compete in. Allowing males who identify as women to compete against women in sports is not a social thing, this is a situation specific to sports and the anatomic differences between males and females. If you can't clearly fit a person into male or female then they should have to compete against males. If someone is male, regardless of how they identify, they should have to compete against males. Just as it is important and necessary to accept in society whatever a person is or chooses to be, in sport we have to accept that what they choose to be may differ from what they are biologically and sports are separated by those biological differences. In both cases it is about fairness.