MelonHead wrote:
Informal poll: Is it the general opinion of this board that Usain Bolt is/was not clean?
Heart says he was clean, head won't allow it.
Hussein Volt definetely was on peptides. He might even have injected proteines.
MelonHead wrote:
Informal poll: Is it the general opinion of this board that Usain Bolt is/was not clean?
Heart says he was clean, head won't allow it.
Hussein Volt definetely was on peptides. He might even have injected proteines.
YAM, I say, Yams
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20131106/health/health2.html
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Seemsso wrote:
Yes but has there ever been a sprinter with the body / stride of Bolt before?
They used to use anatomical excuses for Armstrong. Bolt is as dirty as the 8 slower no dopers.
So Ben Johnson took copious amounts of steriods to do the superhuman time of 9.79, we know Maurice Greene took HGH and EPO to run the same time, "During the prison interview, Montgomery notes that Greene, his old rival, has also been linked to performance-enhancing drugs, though Greene has never been suspended or charged. Last year, a Mexican steroid trafficker reportedly told federal investigators that Greene was among 12 Olympic medalists that he supplied."
http://www.espn.com/olympics/trackandfield/columns/story?columnist=fish_mike&id=4487014Tim Montgomery did testosterone, steroids, THG and probably Insulin and EPO to run 9.78. Powell is dodgy, in a country with no OOC, doing 9.74 prior to Bolt. The concept that Bolt can outrun guys with super human strength is utterly ridiculous.
Mr Busybody wrote:
The logic of this board:
Faster than me=cheater.
Not just this board, but pretty much most losing athletes.
You are so negative, Subway. Bolt is as clean as the other world record holders, e.g. Ayana, Bekele, Coleman, Dibaba, ...
This is confirmed by the authoritative source IAAF.
To the gills.
Dirty. Just take a look at the massive increase in performance during the 2007/2008/2009 season. Yams don’t make you fast.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Seemsso wrote:
Yes but has there ever been a sprinter with the body / stride of Bolt before?
They used to use anatomical excuses for Armstrong. Bolt is as dirty as the 8 slower no dopers.
Lance wasn’t a doper, he rode with a very high cadence.
The consensus is: he's doped.
Jamaica. Sprinter. Do the math.
He never tested positive. That's all.
El Keniano wrote:
Mr Busybody wrote:
The logic of this board:
Faster than me=cheater.
Not just this board, but pretty much most losing athletes.
* losing WESTERN athletes.
Seemsso wrote:
Druggie1 wrote:
The next 8 people slower than him in the 100M have all been caught with drugs,
Yes but has there ever been a sprinter with the body / stride of Bolt before?
And this is why we really don't know for sure. His reaction time at the line was one of the worst for top sprinters yet his top end speed can not be physically matched by anyone. This is what has left the experts scratching their heads . We'll never know for sure.
I think he was clean and that he definitely could be completely clean. But I wouldn’t be surprised if he started to take something later in his career. He could be a genetic freak that we have to question just because of the nature of our sport. Or he could be just as dirty as the rest of them. But, innocent until proven guilty.
Clean
runn wrote:
He never tested positive. That's all.
That's everything.
Agree ...100 clean.
Bolt was a phenom of phenoms as a 15 year old - winning WJs. That would have been clean - who would believe that a 15 yer old would be on drugs? Really ?
So there should be zero need to take drugs. AND, it should be expected that a talent like this would eventually reach world record status. So why the doubt ?
It would be too risky to take drugs - chances are he would eventually get found out.
The Obvious Answer wrote:
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
They used to use anatomical excuses for Armstrong. Bolt is as dirty as the 8 slower no dopers.
Lance wasn’t a doper, he rode with a very high cadence.
Yes, that was it. A cadence only used a couple of times a year and, mysteriously, no other athlete could replicate.
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
Banged into my old 400m coach from years back (in high school), who was banging on about Gatlin etc all being dirty. Yet this person said to me emphatically that "Bolt is clean, he was fast at 16." WTF, even I was fast at 16, that doesn't mean anything. Mary Cain was fast at16 and so was Kejelcha.[/quote]
Don't compare yourself to Bolt. You are not in Bolt's universe.
so? wrote:
Legitt wrote:
He ran sub 20 200m when he was 16. 100% CLEAN.
Most steroid users are teenagers.
Strange that he started visiting Dr. Wohlfahrt when he was 16 years old.
https://www.medicaldaily.com/meet-usain-bolts-controversial-doctor-using-homeopathic-medicine-treat-395075MelonHead wrote:
Informal poll: Is it the general opinion of this board that Usain Bolt is/was not clean?
Heart says he was clean, head won't allow it.
This is a ridiculous subject to discuss. No one on this board can do anything but speculate on the issue based not on facts but on their own pre-conceived notions, biases, etc. Read through the posts. How many are anything other than a statement of pre-existing beliefs, baldly stated prejudices against Jamaicans, inferences based on the performance and actions of people other than Bolt, and unfounded statements about what people are and are not capable of based on no empirical evidence whatsoever?