I think amongst the native Caucasoid-Asiatic "whites" buggery is the biggest sin.
I think amongst the native Caucasoid-Asiatic "whites" buggery is the biggest sin.
London: Boy, 13, survives being blasted in the head with a shotgun moments after a 15-year-old is shot as well
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5697161/Two-boys-aged-12-15-shot-north-west-London.html
England/Great Britain, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTJ2CU13bq0
More people got murdered today in the US than the total number of murders in London this year so far.
Why the obsession with murders in London?
trollism wrote:
More people got murdered today in the US than the total number of murders in London this year so far.
Why the obsession with murders in London?
Maybe if you live in London and had your head bashed in by bike-lock wielding "Antifa" members, you'd get off your duff and start caring about people too.
The mayor of London is a lib who can't & won't criticize a terrorist if he is a Muslim.
Four people have been shot over a 48-hour period in Sadiq Khan’s London, leaving a teenager dead and a 13-year-old and a 15-year-old with head injuries.
The first victim, 17-year-old Rhyhiem Ainsworth Barton, was shot in Cooks Road, Southwark, on Saturday evening, while playing football.
Witnesses to the killing told the BBC a number of shots were fired during the attack, including one which missed a woman and punched through somebody’s window.
Barton, described as a talented rapper by his godmother, later died from his injuries.
Subject of the Queen wrote:
Trusting people with Guns, is part of trusting them with Freedom.
I can see why UK (England) doesn't allow.
Everywhere the citizens are disarmed, there is chaos occurred.
You favourite (USA) example country?
In Melbourne, ethnic gangs invade houses, attack citizens, defying the police.
Teen thugs linked to an emerging gang, Menace to Society, have shamelessly taunted police, bragging on social media about their reckless behaviour damaging property as well as their desire to continue chaos in Melbourne’s western suburbs. The network of youths, mainly of Sudanese origin, regularly boast on social media about their disregard for the law, posting photos of weapons and promoting gang culture. (Herald Sun, 10 Jan, 2018)
Sorry, your Facts are Wrong. Knive crime is actually WORSE outside of London, than in it.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/county-lines-drug-gangs-spread-knife-crime-epidemic-to-shires-3zg2v9tljThe Sunday Times disclosed last month that London’s murder rate had overtaken New York’s in February and March. At least 36 people in the capital have been stabbed to death so far this year.
Knife crime is up 20% in London over three years. But in the home counties the increases since 2014 are far steeper. Knife crime incidents in Hertfordshire are up 150% from 229 incidents in 2014 to 573 in 2017; Hampshire is up 102%, Cambridgeshire up 83%, Warwickshire up 180%, Bedfordshire up 86%, Essex up 86%, Thames Valley up 50% and north Wales up 134%. Norfolk’s knife crime rate has rocketed 274%.
Lib Crazy wrote:
The mayor of London is a lib who can't & won't criticize a terrorist if he is a Muslim.
I just love the weird ideas on here that those that supposedly support ultra-conservative extremist Islamic terrorism are somehow liberals haha.
Sadiq Khan has insisted he has “done nothing wrong” in relation to violence and knife crime as London Mayor, despite a crime wave accelerating massively under his leadership.
“I don’t think we’ve done anything wrong in London. Nor do I think the Police and Crime Commissioners across the country have done much wrong.
“I published last year a knife crime strategy because I recognised the increase in violent crime before I became the Mayor.”
Fortunately, the London Assembly (his scrutinizer) is proposing that it's the hot weather.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cgPN6tlSDkhttps://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/hot-weather-bank-holiday-violent-crime-wave_uk_5af180d2e4b0c4f19326a7acTheresa May cut police. It's not Khan's decision as to how many police officers are in the job.
Numbers of police on the streets have been cut, street crime goes up, not a complex conclusion.
Theresa May cut police. It's not Khan's decision as to how many police officers are in the job.
You mean, the ONLY way to have police in UK is via federal funding??
Either this is bollocks, or heinously dumb.
Imagine if Obama could have controlled Chicago's police force by his pen and phone....
Mayor hires police over here wrote:
Theresa May cut police. It's not Khan's decision as to how many police officers are in the job.
You mean, the ONLY way to have police in UK is via federal funding??
Either this is bollocks, or heinously dumb.
Imagine if Obama could have controlled Chicago's police force by his pen and phone....
The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS), commonly known as the Metropolitan Police and informally as the Met, is the territorial police force responsible for law enforcement in Greater London, excluding the "square mile" of the City of London, which is the responsibility of the City of London Police.
As of January 2017, the Met employed more than 43,000 full-time personnel. This included 31,075 sworn police officers, 8,732 police staff, and 1,464 non-sworn police community support officers. This number excludes the 2,763 Special Constables, who work part-time (a minimum of 16 hours a month) and who have the same powers and uniform as their regular colleagues. This makes the Metropolitan Police the largest police force in the United Kingdom by a significant margin, and one of the biggest in the world.
Since January 2012, the Mayor of London is responsible for the governance of the Metropolitan Police through the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). The mayor is able to appoint someone to act on his behalf; the current office-holder is Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, Sophie Linden.
Mayor hires police over here wrote:
Theresa May cut police. It's not Khan's decision as to how many police officers are in the job.
You mean, the ONLY way to have police in UK is via federal funding??
Either this is bollocks, or heinously dumb.
Imagine if Obama could have controlled Chicago's police force by his pen and phone....
The UK is small. 'Federal funding' isn't really a concept that has any meaning here. All funding for public services is federal essentially. There aren't individual self governing states in the UK. The UK government situated in Parliament makes the overall decisions on big issues such as policing and security. Hence they are always blamed for everything.
Khan can help make decisions about policing strategy etc in the UK but he can't hire more officers/it's not his job to, when the Government has told the Met and other police forces they need to continue 'efficiency savings'. Their budgets have been cut and officers laid off.
The result is more street crime. It's really simple.
It's the same issue with the NHS. It's a service that runs on taxes. Their budgets have not been increased to match the increasing demand and scope of the services they offer, so the standards have gone down and waiting times up.
This government business is not complex in the UK. The complex part is convincing the public that what you are doing is in their interest and trying not to piss off the wrong or too many people.
DiscoGary wrote:
So the murder rate in London is so bad that the Mayor wants to ban knives.
I have a suggestion. Allow concealed carry of guns. Knife murders WILL go down.
I'm not sure what his position is on the explosion of acid attacks.
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/9/gun-control-londons-muslim-mayor-sadiq-khan-bans-k/London does not have a knife problem.
London does not have an acid problem.
London would not have a gun problem if they allowed general ownership of guns.
London has a cultural problem in that there are a lot of people in their society who are uncivilized and willing to resort to violence. Until they fix their cultural problem, no amount of banning common household items will make things better. This is true in the US, the UK, or wherever there's a lot of violence among people.
So, in response to the delightful OP by everyones-mate-at-the-BBQ Gary, what is the London Mayor supposed to do when faced with increasing knife crime?
He cannot tell the Met to hire more police, he can only go so far with enforcing random stop and searches until the public starts to feel oppressed/there isn't the police man power. Trying to ban knives (however pointless) at least seems proactive.
And before another American chimes in with their bit about immigration, that's also not the Mayor's job at all.
Lowest numbers of police since 1985. 19,000 less officers than in 2010.
19% reduction in firearms officers cut (not all police have guns here) over a 6 year period.
Effective funding for police has fallen 18% over 6 years. Overall budget for the Home Office fell from £12.6bn to £10.9bn.
The Government makes these decisions. The current, Conservative Government. Not the Labour siding Mayor of London.
The Government makes these decisions. The current, Conservative Government.
Other than the delusion that there's been a meaningful "conservative" government in UK at least since Thatcher and likely since the second War, ok mate.
Don't see why the mayor of London should get to ban knives then, if he doesn't even control his own police force.