I would love this to turn into a challenging, fast-from-the-start type of race, because we haven't seen Rupp in one of those yet. It's been proven in the past that as long as it's not too hot and the wind isn't in their face the entire time Boston can be a fast (even very fast) course.
My hope is this doesn't turn into another jog-and-wait-until-the-last-10K type race. The slower, tactical style marathons are all Rupp has experience with so far, so you'd think it would be in the rest of field's interest to make the pace honest from early on ... but I though surely someone would do the same in Chicago and there they ended up running like 2:12 pace for the first 20.
Whoever wins I'm just ready to see a fast(er) time in Boston again. Since Mutai's ridiculous 2:03, the winning time has been 2:12, 2:10, 2:08, 2:09, 2:12, and 2:09. Given that there are so many 2:05-2:06 guys nowadays, it seems like even the times in unpaced races on (potentially) harder course should be getting faster too.
Between 1979 and 2002, the winning time in Boston was 2:09 or faster 18 times (out of 24 years) and the WR was 2:08:33 ('69) down to 2:05:38 ('02), so they were usually within 3 minutes (or closer) of the WR.