Yo Nickey wrote:
Surprise surprise. The LRcom "web guy" sucking up to his boss. Are you the guy who keeps deleting post that suggest Rojo is thin skinned? Do you see the irony?
Does Rojo use the term "cuk" or 'beta" when insulting his staff?
To answer your questions:
- no
- no
- no
If I didn't make myself clear, I actually support the change.
My read on this article is that it probably overstates how much the "snowflake" complaints mattered to the actual decision. See this sentence:
They viewed it as a pejorative and worried patients would think they weren’t quite ready to give them proper medical care.
Notice the double-barreled reason. Residents feeling demeaned is a different thing from worrying that patients wouldn't think they that residents were ready to give them proper medical care.
I think it's totally legit to get rid of an institution that undermines both doctor and patient confidence in the medical care being provided. The reality of teaching hospital care is that many of the day-to-day decisions are made by residents. It's not good to group actual doctors making medical decisions (residents) with medical students, who are learning and not in charge of patients.
I can't read the administrators' minds, but my guess is that they saw the tradition as having only possible negatives when it comes to actual care provided (this is also my view), and so they canned it. Because quality of care matters more than tradition.
I'm guessing the questions the Sun asked and the way they reported it emphasize the hurt feelings perspective of this story, because the Sun is basically a rag now. I doubt concern of residents' feelings is why the decision was actually made, because that is in fact kind of stupid, and most Hopkins administrators are not very stupid. (Most.)
Fwiw, my loyalty to Hopkins is stronger than to Robert. My wife trained there and i'm a grad. Robert has always been pleasant to work with