Macie wrote:
The question is what constitutes the word "Flagrant". In 2014 the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel approved adding the word "flangrantly" to the rules pertaining to when a competitor should be in violation of impeding a runner. The rule now distinguishes flagrant contact or impedence from the incidental contact that can occur during running races. By all accounts the student-athletes ran accross the track to congratulate their teammates. This action did not in any way aid their teammates and any impedence was incidental.
yes exactly. the "interference" did not aid the team at all and thus should not have been a DQ