As I've said the threats could be separate from what happened to David (even if the unlikely case the death wasn't accidental). I just want the threats looked into. I don't want to live in a society where someone can make such threats and get away with them.[/quote]
You responded to me in an indirect manner.
Threats imply according to you that 1st degree murder was a possibility.
1) If someone's plan was to drown Mr. Torrence, said person would have had to know Mr. Torrence was going to swim at that time on that day or said person drowned Mr. Torrence somewhere else, then placed his remains in said apartment complex pool. [I doubt it.]
2) Mr. Torrence was given a fatal amount of poison/drug(s). Mr. Torrence decided to swim or relax in pool. The pool is coincidental. The poison/drug(s) reached critical mass while Mr. Torrence was in the pool. [I doubt it.]
This is high level stuff W. Johnson that you are stating was possible. Serious man/men or a femme fatale. No one appeared on surveillance footage. Threat or not. Mr. Johnson, you are speculating and leaving open the possibility of a Israeli Mossad, Russian FSB, Great Britian MI-6 or CIA type assassination.
From online threats to possible murder?