Such a shame. Plus, now all of the IAAF profiles are all messed up and incomplete. It’ll say how someone did at their national champs but not how they did at worlds, or it’ll only show their progression in one event, not all of them. It’s like IAAF absorbed all-athletics but didn’t fix any problems at all.
PrZ wrote:
Such a shame. Plus, now all of the IAAF profiles are all messed up and incomplete. It’ll say how someone did at their national champs but not how they did at worlds, or it’ll only show their progression in one event, not all of them. It’s like IAAF absorbed all-athletics but didn’t fix any problems at all.
IAAF just recently absorbed all-athletics so hopefully, with time, the guys that came over from AA, as well as their data, will help clean up the IAAF site.
Lets just hope that Milesplit and Flotrack follow All-Athletics in shutting down.
idiocracy
coming sooner than we all think
as an aside, no way that movie could be made now
Those Ken Young links were much appreciated, thanks.
rojo wrote:
Shoebacca wrote:
This is actually a good point. Rojo/Wejo, what about looking into taking over the databases these sites had? It's about the best thing you can do to gain market share and boost LRC. This site could be so much more.
All-Athletics will now be part of the IAAF. Wejo and Jonathan Gault used All-Athletics all the time. I hardly ever used it. I don't get why we must keep it up when a) Tilastapaja.org (the site I use) still exists and b) I assume all-athletics will just be part of the IAAF but instead of costing money will now be free.
Isn't this a win-win? Didn't you have to pay for all-athletics?
You just stole the words out of my mouth.
RIP.
Reading the RW article really shows how much this man has done for the sport.
Brojos, give him a black page.