Allie Kieffer wins Doha Half in 1:10:41
https://twitter.com/oiselle_sally/status/951677851966697472
Allie Kieffer top woman at Doha Half in 1:10:41
Pro News/Info/Results
Marathons
Report Thread
You are reporting this thread to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum.
-
-
I meant 1:10:40
-
Huge fan here. AK was my favorite runner even before her NYC breakthrough. What a life story and amazing comeback! She is absolutely killing it and approaching world class level. I predicted 1:10:44 on her IG after vastly underestimating her NYC performance. I’m a believer now. Go Allie!
-
Signs with Oiselle, becomes a winner. Sally wins again.
-
Great that she is proving that her NYC Marathon is not just a fluke.
-
Sally sells out and signs a NIKE footwear athlete.
Awesome performance from the breakout runner of the year. Congrats, Allie and team. -
Kieffer has quickly become the most significant runner named Allie, outshining a younger collegiate runner who may eventually have an even faster marathon PR.
-
Wow, well done. This story just keeps getting better. What’s the equivalent for that time with the full marathon? 2:25?
-
vivalarepublica wrote:
Wow, well done. This story just keeps getting better. What’s the equivalent for that time with the full marathon? 2:25?
2:28:00 -
vivalarepublica wrote:
Wow, well done. This story just keeps getting better. What’s the equivalent for that time with the full marathon? 2:25?
not 2:28:00...sorry. But she won by 2 minutes so presumably ran alone for ten miles at least. She definitely could've run faster, maybe even sub-70 if pushed all the way. So what is 70:00 equal to? About 2:29 probably. But her 2:29 in NYC is better than that. -
reed wrote:
vivalarepublica wrote:
Wow, well done. This story just keeps getting better. What’s the equivalent for that time with the full marathon? 2:25?
not 2:28:00...sorry. But she won by 2 minutes so presumably ran alone for ten miles at least. She definitely could've run faster, maybe even sub-70 if pushed all the way. So what is 70:00 equal to? About 2:29 probably. But her 2:29 in NYC is better than that.
+1
I was going to say 2:30-2:32. -
fdsfsdfsdf wrote:
reed wrote:
vivalarepublica wrote:
Wow, well done. This story just keeps getting better. What’s the equivalent for that time with the full marathon? 2:25?
not 2:28:00...sorry. But she won by 2 minutes so presumably ran alone for ten miles at least. She definitely could've run faster, maybe even sub-70 if pushed all the way. So what is 70:00 equal to? About 2:29 probably. But her 2:29 in NYC is better than that.
+1
I was going to say 2:30-2:32.
No way it's above 2:30. It's probably a shade below 2:28, in fact.
Does any know how hard this course was? -
TrackBot! VDOT 1:10:40 half marathon.
-
Treole wrote:
fdsfsdfsdf wrote:
reed wrote:
vivalarepublica wrote:
Wow, well done. This story just keeps getting better. What’s the equivalent for that time with the full marathon? 2:25?
not 2:28:00...sorry. But she won by 2 minutes so presumably ran alone for ten miles at least. She definitely could've run faster, maybe even sub-70 if pushed all the way. So what is 70:00 equal to? About 2:29 probably. But her 2:29 in NYC is better than that.
+1
I was going to say 2:30-2:32.
No way it's above 2:30. It's probably a shade below 2:28, in fact.
Does any know how hard this course was?
VDOT says it's equivalent to 2:27:50, which sounds about right given she went 2:29 on a tough NYC course. -
reed wrote:
vivalarepublica wrote:
Wow, well done. This story just keeps getting better. What’s the equivalent for that time with the full marathon? 2:25?
not 2:28:00...sorry. But she won by 2 minutes so presumably ran alone for ten miles at least. She definitely could've run faster, maybe even sub-70 if pushed all the way. So what is 70:00 equal to? About 2:29 probably. But her 2:29 in NYC is better than that.
Yes 2:28:00 give or take a few seconds depending on your source (Thanks VDOT!)
That said, my half PR is 1:11 on a fairly tough course, but my full PR is 2:46 on a fast course, so “equivalence” is relative, obviously. -
No, it is your performance which is relative. 1:11 is no where near 2:46.
1:10 is worth 2:28. Kieffer is very consistent right now. -
Also, Kieffer beat Gemma Steele (PBs of 1:09/31:26) by two minutes.
-
YMMV wrote:
No, it is your performance which is relative. 1:11 is no where near 2:46.
1:10 is worth 2:28. Kieffer is very consistent right now.
You missed my point. We are in agreement. 1:10 == 2:28 as I stated originally. Someone disagreed with that, so my point was that maybe they felt that way because the times don't feel equal to them, and I was just using myself as an example -- I can't run marathons obviously. -
Yea pros should be a little better than the rest of us- double the half plus 6 minutes- 2:27. Running alone for a lot of it. She probably would'e broken 70 in Houston. She should get down to 2:25-2:26 in the right race. We're probably going to have to wait a while if she focuses on the 10k this spring and then NYC gets her again.
-
Could Allie Kieffer beat Konstannse Klistergjfosen at the 10k
