The results are not correct. Allie did win with that time. I was in the race, top 20, not in results. Other individuals not running with a team are also missing.
The results are not correct. Allie did win with that time. I was in the race, top 20, not in results. Other individuals not running with a team are also missing.
Wisconsin men were ranked top 10 nationally, yet finished 8th. Not good, and I can't imagine they were holding people out.
Cause I bet she is hurt. And I bet when/if she comes back she will never get back to what she was. Normally when someone improves that quickly and then gets hurt. It's not followed up by then returning to that form. But we can only hope.
Pelican8 wrote:
Indoor? wrote:She might still be trying, doubtful we'll see her again.
Why wouldn't we see her again?
Pelican8 wrote:
Why wouldn't we see her again?
Girls who improve because of significant (unnecessary) weight loss don't last long.
Before:
https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/high-school/garfields-isabelle-olive-posts-impressive-1600-time-at-tacoma-invitational/Now:
http://www.flotrack.org/article/47810-watch-mountain-west-conference-xc-championships-live#.WdCLtJOg_q0http://paulmerca.blogspot.com.au/2016/10/gig-harbors-brenna-peloquin-named.htmlAllieO won wearing one shoe:
http://peninsulaclarion.com/sports/2017-09-30/ostrander-triumphant-cross-country-return
Scroll through the photos, and she's wearing a blue shoe on the right and an orange sock on the left at the finish:
https://www.facebook.com/louisvillesportscommission/posts/10155249224268495
You could break 24 and still not be top 20. They were hauling. 23:10 is not a number you see a lot on a legit course.
zxcvzxcv wrote:
You could break 24 and still not be top 20. They were hauling. 23:10 is not a number you see a lot on a legit course.
Can confirm... Legit course. A couple guys on my team had 8.2 for the GPS (makes sense, we were middle of the pack in the gold race).
annnnno wrote:
[quote]Pelican8 wrote:
Why wouldn't we see her again?
Girls who improve because of significant (unnecessary) weight loss don't last long.
I see what your saying but on the upside she probably grew strong bones during her puberty years. Some of the high school female runners starve themselves which delays puberty, leading to weak bone building during a critical period.
Oops, "you're" saying
Furman men and women really showed up. Men were 2nd behind a dominant and respected NAU team and the women's team finishing a strong 3rd. Good day for their program. NAU women also have gotten increasingly better with a 5th place finish. Some exciting racing for sure.
Looks at the appropriate weight once at BSU. Maybe she lost it "too fast" but looks fit and strong once at BSU. Hope she returns soon.
Rewq wrote:
Wisconsin men were ranked top 10 nationally, yet finished 8th. Not good, and I can't imagine they were holding people out.
#3 ranked NCAA Div I individual Morgan McDonald and Olin Hacker didn't run.
Pelican8 wrote:
annnnno wrote:[quote]Pelican8 wrote:
Why wouldn't we see her again?
Girls who improve because of significant (unnecessary) weight loss don't last long.
I see what your saying but on the upside she probably grew strong bones during her puberty years. Some of the high school female runners starve themselves which delays puberty, leading to weak bone building during a critical period.
Agree, but once girls stop menstruating (due to low BMI/restricted eating) their bone density quickly diminishes-been there done that.
lovin the dirt wrote:
Looks at the appropriate weight once at BSU. Maybe she lost it "too fast" but looks fit and strong once at BSU. Hope she returns soon.
it would appear not, hence the constant cycle of bone injuries.