Kings College notary wrote:
Michelle V wrote:
So it was she who was put on garden leave at the time of the Parliamentary debate on Edwards and then lost he job not long afterwards.This can’t be believed , must be a mistake.
Did she sign the contract between UKS and Kings College and negotiationed such with Prof Cowen?
Can’t see it anyway other than they were the two parties that negotiated the contract.
But what is wrong with that?
Lots!
The basis of the testing and the analysis was that it must comply with ISO 17025 which, besides needing contemporaneous calibration curves specially said that the person who did the analysis must not be the person who was involved in the contact negotiations.
Thus,the analysis was in material breach of contract between Kings College and UKS; between UKS and UKA ; and between UKA and Edwards.
As such the analysis has to be dismissed as having no validity.