Forensics lab RTC, used by Police, has had staff arrested . Cases have been overthrown.
Why has this not happened in the Edwards case?
Forensics lab RTC, used by Police, has had staff arrested . Cases have been overthrown.
Why has this not happened in the Edwards case?
BBC nudes wrote:
Forensics lab RTC, used by Police, has had staff arrested . Cases have been overthrown.
Why has this not happened in the Edwards case?
Having 60 aliquots whichbrequired someone else’s urine, knowing that who the original sample it was as when doing the A sample would be more than enough to bin the result.
This leaves on one side any deliberate mal analyse and subsequent hiding of evidence should have caused serious legal action.
BBC nudes wrote:
Forensics lab RTC, used by Police, has had staff arrested . Cases have been overthrown.
Why has this not happened in the Edwards case?
Now it appears, as headlines and lead story,that due to errors 10,500 prosecutions overthrown.
Not because each test was shown to be a mistake but because they could not be relied upon.
It may be that the Edwards case is not quashed is that ALL positive results from Kings College are unreliable.
What costs for Governing Bodies to pay years and years of damages.
BBC nudes wrote:
BBC nudes wrote:
Forensics lab RTC, used by Police, has had staff arrested . Cases have been overthrown.
Why has this not happened in the Edwards case?
Now it appears, as headlines and lead story,that due to errors 10,500 prosecutions overthrown.
Not because each test was shown to be a mistake but because they could not be relied upon.
It may be that the Edwards case is not quashed is that ALL positive results from Kings College are unreliable.
What costs for Governing Bodies to pay years and years of damages.
You must remember that the basis of WADA is normal rules don’t apply; they are just sports rules and can’t be challenged.
BBC nudes wrote:
Forensics lab RTC, used by Police, has had staff arrested . Cases have been overthrown.
Why has this not happened in the Edwards case?
Edwards’s has to be declared innocent with all the lab failures
Don dondon wrote:
BBC nudes wrote:
Forensics lab RTC, used by Police, has had staff arrested . Cases have been overthrown.
Why has this not happened in the Edwards case?
Edwards’s has to be declared innocent with all the lab failures
And those responsible should have sanctions applied.
Don dondon wrote:
Don dondon wrote:
Edwards’s has to be declared innocent with all the lab failures
And those responsible should have sanctions applied.
Wada and accociates are Teflon coated and need to protect their industry.
Teflon wrote:
Don dondon wrote:
And those responsible should have sanctions applied.
Wada and accociates are Teflon coated and need to protect their industry.
After all this time justice should rule and heads need to roll,even if they have retired or moved to other jobs.
Hansard wrote:
Teflon wrote:
Wada and accociates are Teflon coated and need to protect their industry.
After all this time justice should rule and heads need to roll,even if they have retired or moved to other jobs.
A good few have been honoured by Queen
Paul ed wrote:
Hansard wrote:
After all this time justice should rule and heads need to roll,even if they have retired or moved to other jobs.
A good few have been honoured by Queen
Never honoured by me, check your facts.I was dead.
Jumbo brain wrote:
Anyone with a tiny brain would know if you hide evidence the case gets dropped.
I buried the evidence and it still did me no good.
Fred West wrote:
Jumbo brain wrote:
Anyone with a tiny brain would know if you hide evidence the case gets dropped.
I buried the evidence and it still did me no good.
Me neither.
Rose West wrote:
Fred West wrote:
I buried the evidence and it still did me no good.
Me neither.
It is so wrong to use the name of convicted murderers even though they did bury the evidence under concrete in their cellar.
But quite funny.
Why did they refuse to give the evidence as to where the sample went when it went missing for a few days?
Davis report wrote:
Why did they refuse to give the evidence as to where the sample went when it went missing for a few days?
So the sample had a breach of the chain of custody for days.
According to the rules the cases should have stopped at that point.
WADA chum wrote:
Davis report wrote:
Why did they refuse to give the evidence as to where the sample went when it went missing for a few days?
So the sample had a breach of the chain of custody for days.
According to the rules the cases should have stopped at that point.
It was also stated that the sample had leaked and was emptied in transit.
Davis report wrote:
WADA chum wrote:
So the sample had a breach of the chain of custody for days.
According to the rules the cases should have stopped at that point.
It was also stated that the sample had leaked and was emptied in transit.
So how did they do 60 sepetate tests on the urine without having to add someone else’s urine to the sample.
WADA chum wrote:
Davis report wrote:
So the sample had a breach of the chain of custody for days.
According to the rules the cases should have stopped at that point.
It was also stated that the sample had leaked and was emptied in transit.[/
So how did they do 60 sepetate tests on the urine without having to add someone else’s urine to the sample.
UK Sport instructed staff not to answer any correspondence on the matter .
Davis report wrote:
WADA chum wrote:
It was also stated that the sample had leaked and was emptied in transit.[/
So how did they do 60 sepetate tests on the urine without having to add someone else’s urine to the sample.
UK Sport instructed staff not to answer any correspondence on the matter .
What a simple way to shut down appeals esp as UKS themselves refused to provide evidence.
WADA chum wrote:
Davis report wrote:
UK Sport instructed staff not to answer any correspondence on the matter .
What a simple way to shut down appeals esp as UKS themselves refused to provide evidence.
UKS funded UKA and the Doping Lab yet they were entrusted with looking at new evidence on the lab work , lab work which they paid for and or hid.