This needs to go to the Supreme Court.
This needs to go to the Supreme Court.
With all this hidden evidence; clear him.
More cover ups than the Saudi’s. Edwards innocent
Hacksaws missing sample; innocent , remove ban.
More cover ups than I have ever seen
Davis report wrote:
Kavanaugh 2 wrote:
How did this case even reach a charge.
Because most of the above was hidden.
They knew about the hacksawing but choose to ignore it.The hacksawing should be seen in the context of the sample going missing and that seen in the context of UKS refusing to provide evidence that would have explained where it was when it went missing.
Just drop this fiasco.
Silly wrote:
Davis report wrote:
Because most of the above was hidden.
They knew about the hacksawing but choose to ignore it.The hacksawing should be seen in the context of the sample going missing and that seen in the context of UKS refusing to provide evidence that would have explained where it was when it went missing.
Just drop this fiasco.
Twice a bad as the Saudi murder cover up. At least the Soudis admitted the offence; eventually.
Silly wrote:
Davis report wrote:
Because most of the above was hidden.
They knew about the hacksawing but choose to ignore it.The hacksawing should be seen in the context of the sample going missing and that seen in the context of UKS refusing to provide evidence that would have explained where it was when it went missing.
Just drop this fiasco.
Can the police investigate the perversion of justice?
Very silly wrote:
Silly wrote:
Just drop this fiasco.
Can the police investigate the perversion of justice?
If it was in the USA I bet the FBI would be on to it, and quite right.
Kavanaugh wrote:
Very silly wrote:
Can the police investigate the perversion of justice?
If it was in the USA I bet the FBI would be on to it, and quite right.
I will say again, FBI would have sorted it out.
Why has a lost chain of custody and a hacksawed sample not caused the case to be dropped?
Let’s not forget the fundamental breach of ISO17025.
And the monitored and reported and ion as being positive and that ion was not from a banned product.
Appalling!
Also did no calibration work up.
Again appalling.
Every time I look at this case I see the most appalling travesty of justice.
Davis report wrote:
And the monitored and reported and ion as being positive and that ion was not from a banned product.
Appalling!
How could he be guilty of having a non banned molecule?
The Supreme Court would say he is not guilty of this stitch up.
So why is edwards still banned with a test that never took place .ie not valid
What wada wrote:
Davis report wrote:
And the monitored and reported and ion as being positive and that ion was not from a banned product.
Appalling!
How could he be guilty of having a non banned molecule?
Can someone please explain this please?
Wada wada wrote:
What wada wrote:
How could he be guilty of having a non banned molecule?
Can someone please explain this please?
It is like a page out of Alice in Wonderland.
What a farce. Clear Edwards.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Clayton Murphy is giving some great insight into his training.
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
70% of WNBA players are black - only 3 have sneaker deals - All are white