Money was used to overwhelm WADA
Bit like Tyson Fury using his millions to get off a life ban for two positives and a test refusal .
Money was used to overwhelm WADA
Bit like Tyson Fury using his millions to get off a life ban for two positives and a test refusal .
Froome problem wrote:
Money was used to overwhelm WADA
Bit like Tyson Fury using his millions to get off a life ban for two positives and a test refusal .
Pity Edwards did not have millions to expose the fake evidence.
How many other cases are based on fake evidence and the athlete is innocent.
Be fair, most properly only a fraction of those guilty that WADA failed to catch.
What mess, all fed by lies.
Letsrun still pretend that the fake evidence can be ignored.
Interesting that today’s lead quote is about Froome case and poor science.
You heard it first on this thread.
Fake science and hidden evidence and officials joining together to hide stuff in the Edwards case.
It was only money that cleared Froome and exposed the crap non peer reviewed science.Whatcan clear Edwards?
Why did they make the most schoolboy error and measure the wrong compound and then hide the evidence?
Really wrote:
What do the experts think of this wrote:
Davis report wrote:
Why did they make the most schoolboy error and measure the wrong compound and then hide the evidence?
Was it an error ?
The Lab was doing the correct calibration work up and presenting such at the time.So why not in the Edwards test?
Cynik wrote:
Davis report wrote:
Why did they make the most schoolboy error and measure the wrong compound and then hide the evidence?
Was it an error ?
The Lab was doing the correct calibration work up and presenting such at the time.So why not in the Edwards test?
You can’t be suggesting a conspiracy can you?
Cc tv wrote:
Cynik wrote:
Was it an error ?
The Lab was doing the correct calibration work up and presenting such at the time.So why not in the Edwards test?
You can’t be suggesting a conspiracy can you?
Something very strange in all this.
Why did they try and hide the evidence by claiming that to give the hidden evidence would be a breach of health and safety.How could they argue that it would have been injurious to Edwards to provide the calibration data.
Data they latter had to admit they never bothered to create in the first place!
Cc tv wrote:
Cc tv wrote:
You can’t be suggesting a conspiracy can you?
Something very strange in all this.
Why did they try and hide the evidence by claiming that to give the hidden evidence would be a breach of health and safety.How could they argue that it would have been injurious to Edwards to provide the calibration data.
Data they latter had to admit they never bothered to create in the first place!
Health and safety used to hide evidence.
What a joke
47 Sunlet strip wrote:
Cc tv wrote:
Something very strange in all this.
Why did they try and hide the evidence by claiming that to give the hidden evidence would be a breach of health and safety.How could they argue that it would have been injurious to Edwards to provide the calibration data.
Data they latter had to admit they never bothered to create in the first place!
Health and safety used to hide evidence.
What a joke
Amongst the hidden evidence was the 50 plus analyses done on Edwards “A Sample “. They did not have enough urine to do this according to Prof Cowen’s own stated protocols.
So where did the fake urine come from.
“Fake urine”, even Trump could not make this up.
This fake urine stinks..
UKSport refused to all any of their staff to correspond on the matter when the Davis report was presented to them.
How is that for honesty by the Doping Police?
Mr Edwards, you need to hire Sky’s team of lawyers.
Cardoso’s ghost wrote:
Mr Edwards, you need to hire Sky’s team of lawyers.
You are correct.All athletes need the same lawyers as Froome and Tyson Fury.
The Drug Testing Police invent there own rules without fear of real science sticking its nose in.
Wada experts are insiders from the same group of Wada labs that do the testing and gets funds drivered from Wada authority.
In the real world of science how could the KCL Lab get away without doing Calibration Work Up having said that they had done so and used multiple methods of hiding the fact that they had not.
I add , monitoring the wrong Ion and fake urine.
But Edwards was a shot putter on manual workers income.
But let me add, Froomes lawyers may well have had some good pointers from the Davis report.
The irony of it all.
Toss Rucker wrote:
[quote]Cardoso’s ghost wrote:
Mr Edwards, you need to hire Sky’s team of lawyers.
You are correct.All athletes need the same lawyers as Froome and Tyson Fury.
The Drug Testing Police invent there own rules without fear of real science sticking its nose in.
Wada experts are insiders from the same group of Wada labs that do the testing and gets funds drivered from Wada authority.
In the real world of science how could the KCL Lab get away without doing Calibration Work Up having said that they had done so and used multiple methods of hiding the fact that they had not.
I add , monitoring the wrong Ion and fake urine.
But Edwards was a shot putter on manual workers income.
But let me add, Froomes lawyers may well have had some good pointers from the Davis report.
The irony of it all.[/quote
All this makes it a joke that you could criminalise doping offences.
Place the criminal level of evidence as the standard of evidence and there would hardly be a doping ban.
What Froome ( and Fury) has done and Edwards may well do is expose the whole basis of testing.
I note that there is a challenge to the retests for granddaughter metabolites from London.
They have no idea if such are due to the metabolic breakdown and indeed re synthesis of contraceptive pills.
All of great interest.
Great set of posts.
Never saw all this in terms of money being the only way to challenge the poor non peer reviewed science.
Thought the science journals would expose it.
I noted in the Froome case that the UCI has chosen not to have Wada science exposed in the Froome case.
There is talk on Letsrun front pages of the way the Wada may not recover from the Froome case.
Exactly, this was the situation in the Edwards case over the many years.
Hidden and fake science and procedures that had to be covered up to preserve some faith in the testing.
It is worth the effort to read the Davis report for an insight into Wada world and how they can be desperate to get a positive against all scientific evidence