Louise 1 wrote:
This cannot just be about one case there has to be a much bigger picture .why would it go on 24 years What are they hiding.
Why don’t you tell us?
Louise 1 wrote:
This cannot just be about one case there has to be a much bigger picture .why would it go on 24 years What are they hiding.
Why don’t you tell us?
For one example look how the former head of UK Sport,who got honoured by the Queen and is now a Baroness ,refused to allow her staff to reply to Dr Davis’s paper.A paper that demonstrated huge problems with the way the test was done compared with the way Prof Cowen told the hearing.
Not least of these problems was the hacksawing of the sample to open it and the absence of calibration data.
Baroness Sue Campbell is now head of women’s football at the English FA.
As a total coincidence the FA provide the biggest number of samples for Prof Cowen to analyse and have done so for several decades.
Steroid users are the Worlds biggest liars and I have personally known many of them.......Edwards is just mad he got caught...
truthseakr wrote:
Steroid users are the Worlds biggest liars and I have personally known many of them.......Edwards is just mad he got caught...
You have to be a retard not to have grasped the significance of the fact that according to Professor Cowen’s own the testimony there had to be urine substitution.
Only a retard would fail to see that such invalidates any results.
Dude....Why are you twisting yourself in knots in order to deny the obvious?
truthseakr wrote:
Dude....Why are you twisting yourself in knots in order to deny the obvious?
No knots are being twisted only the untwisting of the knots of lies by the doping police to get a conviction when there was not one to be had.
Hacksaws on samples.
No calibration.
Substituted urine.
Missing chain of custody.
Breaches of Data Law.
Misinformation to Parliament.
I could go on.
Teacher to the retarded wrote:
truthseakr wrote:
Dude....Why are you twisting yourself in knots in order to deny the obvious?
No knots are being twisted only the untwisting of the knots of lies by the doping police to get a conviction when there was not one to be had.
Hacksaws on samples.
No calibration.
Substituted urine.
Missing chain of custody.
Breaches of Data Law.
Misinformation to Parliament.
I could go on.
Well “truthseakr”,my last post seems to have shut you up.Which of the lies do you think is Edwards actually creating to be a twist of knots?
Sounds familiar
Once again wrote:
Sounds familiar
https://www.rt.com/sport/416249-wada-doping-fancy-bears/
Almost; but in the Edwards case something strange happened.
The A sample went missing but within this missing time it was reported to have badly leaked but then the Lab mysteriously found urine from someone else.
The B sample was opened by a hacksaw;yes a hacksaw!
I think a central problem,and one the latest Rio story illustrates, is that to conduct tests that comply with full forensic principles is rather expensive.
They could not admit the problems with the Edwards case because it brings the whole system into disrepute.
We then find out how simple is was for the authorities to create totally unreliable results in Sochi.
Have you noticed that the question has not been raised about other malpractices at other championships.
This is the extra lesson the Edwards case should tell people.Anything is possible!
In my case the scientist got the solicitor to witness when you put the container into hot water the lid popped off.
Paul ed wrote:
In my case the scientist got the solicitor to witness when you put the container into hot water the lid popped off.
Yes WADA have known for decades how to open the sample bottles without breaking the seal and thus being able to close it again without anyone noticing.
This is what makes it such a joke about the astonishment that the Russians could do the same in Sochi.Rather surprised that the Russians left scratches, schoolboy errors.
Fancy Bears please note that the very people from the West that are now controlling Russian testing have known about it all for decades.
Paul ed wrote:
In my case the scientist got the solicitor to witness when you put the container into hot water the lid popped off.
How come this staggering bit of info has never been made public before?
So the containers can just be popped open in hot water!
Next you will be telling me that envelopes can be steamed open and that Bletchley Park cracked the German codes.
It has many years ago .
Paul ed wrote:
It has many years ago .
Exactly.Over many years it had been known that the containers for the urine could be opened using hot water without being detected and yet such has never been made public.
Why had WADA hidden this from all?
These newspapers are full of the colasping of yet another rape trial due to prosecutors failing to provide evidence to the defence.
This is the case in the Edwards case were vital evidence was persistently hidden despite having to use the courts to get it disclosed.
Hey Paul, you sound like Lance Armstrong....
truthseakr wrote:
Hey Paul, you sound like Lance Armstrong....
Hey Retard.
I pointed out a whole series of fundamental and material breaches of all protocols.
I asked you to deal with them;you failed to do so.
That sort on intellect warrants the dunces cap and sitting on the stupid corner.
Hacksawing
No cal data
Substituted urine
Deliberate hiding of evidence by all agencies
Etc etc
Since 1996 before alleged test they knew that the containers were not secured.
Actually you sound more like LA. Denying written proof and admission by the authorities that the chain of custody and testing were invalid. Plus ignoring that High Court judge stated that Paul's case against his ban was correct but time barred. Who is deluding themselves here? Is it Paul or you. I think it is abundantly clear to the forum readers that it is you . You just state your unsupported prejudices whereas Paul has provided reams of documented proof. Please examine your conscience and stop this bad stuff!
Paul....You know you cheated....
Somehow in your brain you have rationalized it......But it's still cheating....And you got what you deserved...
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Red Bull (who sponsors Mondo) calls Mondo the pole vaulting Usain Bolt. Is that a fair comparison?