powerful heelstriker wrote:
mrtalent wrote:Yes because it would be better to run slightly more miles at a less intense pace. 7:00 pace is a little fast for an "easy" run and I'm a 16:40 5K runner. Usually I do 5 the day before at 7:40-8:00 pace and the morning of the race I do a 2 mile shakeout. The pace of the shakeout is from 8:00-8:20 pace, very slow and relaxed.
You would have to actually try the faster pace shakeout and run slower than you already are to "prove" that.
It's also pretty funny that your form and forefoot running obsession has yielded such a mediocre 5k.
I'm 17 years old, I have a past of injury and improper training, and I am not necessarily talented. Give me a break. I wouldn't call it a forefoot running obsession, I would call it a desire to be the best runner I can be and help others do the same. And maybe a little bit of perfectionism. Anyone who refutes that running naturally is not better or necessary just hasn't tried it or or allowed themselves to adapt to it.
And why run a shakeout at a faster pace? It's called a shakeout because it "shakes out" the nervousness and gets the blood flowing. No aerobic benefit is needed from it, the purpose is to just get the legs moving. So I guess it isn't wrong to run it at a moderate pace, but it isn't necessary to risk any leg fatigue. Especially if you are training through a race.