10 flat in the semis? 9.92, 9.94, 9.95in the final? The 1991 final was much faster...
10 flat in the semis? 9.92, 9.94, 9.95in the final? The 1991 final was much faster...
DougC wrote:
10 flat in the semis? 9.92, 9.94, 9.95in the final? The 1991 final was much faster...
Calcy/Venti claims the 1991 track was dodgy, he maybe right.
DougC wrote:
10 flat in the semis? 9.92, 9.94, 9.95in the final? The 1991 final was much faster...
Lemme guess - you also want clean sport along with a 9.6 in the 100m final?
crete wrote:
DougC wrote:10 flat in the semis? 9.92, 9.94, 9.95in the final? The 1991 final was much faster...
Lemme guess - you also want clean sport along with a 9.6 in the 100m final?
If you're saying that race was clean, I would be thrilled. I'm hoping that's the case... 9.58 and 19.19 just seem ridiculous now .
I think the track was dead and/or the air was thick.
same track as 2012 tho
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
DougC wrote:10 flat in the semis? 9.92, 9.94, 9.95in the final? The 1991 final was much faster...
Calcy/Venti claims the 1991 track was dodgy, he maybe right.
You drunk?
lunatics^3 wrote:
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:Calcy/Venti claims the 1991 track was dodgy, he maybe right.
You drunk?
is this a joke?
Does Mondo hold up well five years later?
Did the earlier rain make it spongy?
It's not the same track as 2012.
Star wrote:
I think the track was dead and/or the air was thick.
This. Smoke and haze from the B.C. wildfires.
They ran the semis earlier the same day right?
CS Runner wrote:
It's not the same track as 2012.
Correct. They tore out the 2012 Oly track not long after the Olympics.
Blame Kamloops wrote:
Star wrote:I think the track was dead and/or the air was thick.
This. Smoke and haze from the B.C. wildfires.
Not Kamloops' fault. They have merely inherited the smoke from nearby fires. Smoke so thick you can feel it with every breath.
It has not been just in London this year. For the entire year so far only Coleman has gone under 9.90. 6-10 years ago, never less than five did so. In 2011,
*NINE *guys were under 9.90.
Something is up. A big part has to do with Jamaica.
No kidding. Asafa Powell would have won today's race for sure, like Bolt in '08 patting his chest while looking around.
At least Bolt added to his sub-10 lifetime total. That aspect has been absurdly unreported.
warnings from iaaf that no grace on testosterone ratios at all .
so androgens use has been limited
but still all dirty as sin on the speed peptide
every one of them in final and many in semi's on it .
also their is a speed endurance ped that been used by some
like wayde and maybe aided farah in his race .
but of negligible effect over 100m
track average and conditions cool but will be good for 400m times
one of these monaco bouncy type tracks
better track and conditions still low 9.80's and this is not clean
all finalists still dopers regardless of times.
The race was on cinders.
Gravity storm.
DougC wrote:
10 flat in the semis? 9.92, 9.94, 9.95in the final? The 1991 final was much faster...
Chilly temps and headwinds don't for a fast sprint final make
End of thread
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
NAU women have no excuse - they should win it all at 2024 NCAA XC
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!