cnfuzed wrote:
Now tied for 9th fastest, all time.
4th fasted American behind Tyson Gay, Justin Gatlin, and Maurice Greene.
Wow.
Monty, or is he erased for being on the very, very naughty sauce?
cnfuzed wrote:
Now tied for 9th fastest, all time.
4th fasted American behind Tyson Gay, Justin Gatlin, and Maurice Greene.
Wow.
Monty, or is he erased for being on the very, very naughty sauce?
rojo wrote:
3rd fastest all time for USA and it looked l like he was barely trying.
He's the favorite for World CHampionship gold in my mind!!
Aren't you a sports journalist or something?
Gatlin ran 9.74 about this time of year in 2015 and Bolt did the job anyway.
How can you bet that Coleman will beat the man who ran 9.58 and has beaten every 9.6/9.7 100m man ever, because he ran a 9.82?
9.7 times are nothing for Bolt.
Bolt is retiring because he has done everything he wants to in track. Not because he is old and slow.
calculo wrote:
Impressed easily, are you. wrote:Your mind, tricks are playing. + 1.3 wind, there was. Warming up only yet, Yohan and Usain are.is that a joke ???
it wasn't a hot day & he didn't run flat-out to line with not even a dip !
flat-out on a hot day that wouda been ~ 9.7-flat
how many times has blake ever run faster than that ???
Don't be ridiculous. Blake and Bolt don't need to contest with made up times. Blake ran 9.69 so he actually bettered your totally made up 9.70 time, in real life.
Blake's 9.69 was into a -0.1 also. So that makes it more like a 9.63/9.64 with the wind Coleman had.
Essentially you are taking a 9.82 with a 1.3m/s wind and saying that it is as good as Blake who ran 9.69 into a -0.1. Why do you even post here?
What's more, how many times has Blake beaten Bolt in a major champs....
xcvxcvxv wrote:
He was easing up at the end. So, there is more to come from him.
With 9.93, Cameron Burrell joins his father Leroy Burrell (9.92?) in the low 9.90s. That has surely never happened before, right?
Seriously? Leroy Burrell held the world record at 9.85.
I hope Coleman is clean but he does for and $EC cheat team and well the $EC loves to cheat with roids paying for recruits,etc. Now if Coleman was at say L$U then you know he was on roids.
Did rojo seriously hijack this thread? WTF?!
Not Lolo, surely not.
they call me flopro wrote:
I hope Coleman is clean but he does for and $EC cheat team and well the $EC loves to cheat with roids paying for recruits,etc. Now if Coleman was at say L$U then you know he was on roids.
Negative. You run below 10s you are doping. End of story. If it could be done naturally more people would be running sub 10s. Cmon people do your research.
they call me flopro wrote:
I hope Coleman is clean but he does for and $EC cheat team and well the $EC loves to cheat with roids paying for recruits,etc. Now if Coleman was at say L$U then you know he was on roids.
What is your deal with LSU!? You sound like a bitter crybaby, your girls 4x1 got dq'ed.. get over it!
Lol Dwumpf wrote:
xcvxcvxv wrote:9.82 in a prelim. Very, very impressive. We should see a very fast 200m time from him as well (19.50-19.66) and maybe mid to high 9.7s in the 100m finals.
He looks to be a force to be reckoned with at World's now. I wouldn't go so far as to say that he should be favored over Bolt but the latter is going to have to be in good shape this time.
He will run 9.9mid in the final.
Or barely 10s ... I think it is supposed to be raining
calculo wrote:
Impressed easily, are you. wrote:Your mind, tricks are playing. + 1.3 wind, there was. Warming up only yet, Yohan and Usain are.is that a joke ???
it wasn't a hot day & he didn't run flat-out to line with not even a dip !
flat-out on a hot day that wouda been ~ 9.7-flat
how many times has blake ever run faster than that ???
He certainly eased up in the last 5-10m and didn't dip ... but there's no way that would have been 9.70. I'd say 9.75 at best. He won't run faster than his semi time in the final. It'll be interesting to see what he can do later on this summer ... 9.70 is a world away from 9.82
Jdjdjdjdjdjd wrote:
xcvxcvxv wrote:He was easing up at the end. So, there is more to come from him.
With 9.93, Cameron Burrell joins his father Leroy Burrell (9.92?) in the low 9.90s. That has surely never happened before, right?
Seriously? Leroy Burrell held the world record at 9.85.
Do you know the meaning of a question mark?
Burrell set two world records, at 9.90, beaten by Lewis soon after, and then 9.85 later, which I had forgotten. He also jumped 8.37m-27' 5 1/2" in college.
Vondell Perriott wrote:
How many NCAA sprinters have ran...
Sub 6.46, 9.85, 20.00..........?
well considering the old record was 9.89, im going to say only coleman has done that....
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
cnfuzed wrote:Now tied for 9th fastest, all time.
4th fasted American behind Tyson Gay, Justin Gatlin, and Maurice Greene.
Wow.
Monty, or is he erased for being on the very, very naughty sauce?
The sauce took down those crazy fast times. 9.92 is his official best.
Guystick wrote:
And apparently on a diet of cheezeburgers
Sounds pretty amazing.
Vondell Perriott wrote:
Don't you guys ever get bored with....they're all dirty......? So what big damn deal. Who doesn't cheat?
including your wife.
Not married stupid.
Why just make stuff up?
calculo wrote:
Bad Wigins wrote:It's not how good the gauge is, it's where they put it. My hypothesis is it's windier on the track than on the infield where they set the gauge, because of the way the west wind gets channeled south by the west stands. The WNW wind moving past the south edge of the stands creates a pressure gradient causing air above the track to rush southward, and the wind passing the north end rushes south to replace the air on the track, and so forth. This creates an air current that is strong near the stands but weaker on the field, as the "draft" from the stands that causes it doesn't reach that far.i have no idea what this goobledegook is supposed to mean
we are only interested in vector component of wind in direction of straight, no interest what right angle vector wind
iaaf have standard placement :
no more than 2m from track & 50m from finish line
if you don't think there are not enough competent ivy league math/physics graduates in ncaa to be able to place gauge according to those specs, well then...
Your typical Ivy League math/physics grad is about as good at math as the Brojos are at spelling and grammar. If you want a competent mathematician you'll have to use a UC grad.
calculo wrote:
hmmmmmm wrote:WTFFFFFFFF NCAA RECORD B
no surprise whatsoever if posters had bothered reading the forum
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=82398189.82 shoud not have shocked anyone by 1 iota
You predicted he would run 9.7x. He ran 9.8x. I guess it is you who should be surprised?
Anyway, I don't think anybody is too surprised, he was expected by everybody to go well sub 10. 9.7x would have surprised everybody except you, though. Just admit you were wrong for the prelims, we'll see if you were right after the finals.