Absolutely! If that happens then everything that the loudmouths say is bunk.Might I recommend Missio's "Middle Fingers in the Air" to them? I think I might.FYI, I saw someone in 2014 who was a 13-14 guy run a 14:57 even though he was not in the same shape, exactly, plus he was recovering from hamstring issues. Only a net difference of -6.4% from where he was. I'd love to see a sub 15.and, calculating equivalents, I am realistically predicting 15:16. So, it should be close.
back on the horse wrote:
[quote]Stoppit Smith wrote:
I am going with 15:30.
And I would LOVE to see a 15:30 for you, why?
#1 because it means you win
#2 because it will make all of the weight-shamers shut up.
Thank you.
[quote]
Or I could try and keep the 20lbs and still run 14:20. That would really prove the 'weight-shamers' wrong