YouYouYou wrote:
For a woman
49 400m to 3:50 1500m = 1:55 800m
Haha this is enjoyable. Where does all her speed go? Weird.
Ok, so Semenya can tackle the 1500m World Record?
If we use your math, a woman whose 800m is 2.3 times slower than her best 400m, is capable of a 1500m that is twice her best 800m.
So take someone like Bishop with a 1:57 800m. She hasnt run a 400m for a while, but potentially you say she could run something 2.3 times less than her best 400m, so sub 51? And then be able to also run 3:54 for the 1500? MADNESS.
You might then say there is no way she can run 3:54, she is more of a speed girl, so in that case her 400m must be significantly quicker than 51. Maybe Bishop is a 48/49 girl by your reckoning?
Or, indeed, she may not be that fast over 400m and has more endurance than her 4:09 PR suggests. So she must then be quicker than 3:54, maybe 3:52 or 3:50 even in order to run a 1:57 flat with insufficient 400m speed (by your logic)?
Hopefully you see this doesn't make any sense. If a measly 1:55 requires 49 400m speed and world record 1500m speed then why are there other girls who can run 1:56/1:57 without anywhere near that speed or endurance.
You have clearly NEVER trained with or coached a female athlete. Your ideas are wild and straight out of your ass. Their biology is not significantly different to men, they are just slower.