ðŸ‘🾠ðŸ‘🾠ðŸ‘🾠This, right here, is the nub.
ðŸ‘🾠ðŸ‘🾠ðŸ‘🾠This, right here, is the nub.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Casual obsever wrote:Probably she planned her glowing to stop two days before the race. Too risky then to get tested during the travel, no risk at all to "miss" one test.
She's so sophisticated as to judge her glow time within a very specific window but at the same time so careless that she fails to respond to missed test notifications? If she had really put precision timing into doping, she wouldn't have left a single missed test notification unanswered.
Bzzzt. If the test is unscheduled, as most are, and she was in a cycle, she'd have to miss. Cyclists talked about testers showing up at the front door, then they leave out the back.
Never testing positive in competition isn't hard. Don't be stupid and plan your cycle to be off PEDs the week or two before. The effectiveness of the EPO urinalysis falls off a cliff a few days. Not that the IAAF would ever sanction an Olympic podium a few months later.
Either she missed because she was way too hot, or so completely disorganized to the point of disfunction.
The nub, knob, is that blacks have talent, and then cheat harder than anyone else. Whites give up because they are fooled into thinking they missed out on some fictitious genetic lottery.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/5d/ed/77/5ded77fcf38e8f5d6b0f587a3affa9da.jpgIt certainly is. POY.
Lydiard is God wrote:
The nub, knob, is that blacks have talent, and then cheat harder than anyone else. Whites give up because they are fooled into thinking they missed out on some fictitious genetic lottery.
This sport isn't for you, son. Envy, disgruntlement and resentment will do you in. Again, for your own health, stick to stuff you lot are good at - like rugby, cricket, aussie rules footie and sheep.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
She's so sophisticated as to judge her glow time within a very specific window but at the same time so careless that she fails to respond to missed test notifications? If she had really put precision timing into doping, she wouldn't have left a single missed test notification unanswered.
Do you really think elites dope themselves, and that just randomly via trial and error?
casual obsever wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:She's so sophisticated as to judge her glow time within a very specific window but at the same time so careless that she fails to respond to missed test notifications? If she had really put precision timing into doping, she wouldn't have left a single missed test notification unanswered.
Do you really think elites dope themselves, and that just randomly via trial and error?
Do you really think that she and her team are sophisticated enough to measure her glow time within such a tight window before a competition but at the same time are so careless that they don't even bother responding to a missed test notification?
El Keniano wrote:
Lydiard is God wrote:The nub, knob, is that blacks have talent, and then cheat harder than anyone else. Whites give up because they are fooled into thinking they missed out on some fictitious genetic lottery.
This sport isn't for you, son. Envy, disgruntlement and resentment will do you in. Again, for your own health, stick to stuff you lot are good at - like rugby, cricket, aussie rules footie and sheep.
OK, sh!t for brains, you don't think Beauden Barrett has any fast-twitch fibres, or Christian Cullen, and I suppose you haven't heard of Darren Albert. There is no special distribution of fast-twitch fibres amongst blacks.
However there is definitely a special distribution of doping-black>>>>wog>>>>white.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/genetic-research-shows-athletic-skill-is-not-a-black-and-white-issue/news-story/794c66e0c667e7db8af44edc852531fa?nk=c24bc1c1b729044a3a1e733c756c5091-1492872435Genetic research shows athletic skill is not a black and white issue
Jamaica's Usain Bolt, right, and France's Christophe Lemaitre after the 200m semi-finals at the London 2012 Olympic Games.
MATTHEW SYEDThe Times2:50PM August 9, 2012
BLACK men have dominated the sprints again. All the finalists in the 100m were black, as they have been at every Olympic final for more than a quarter of a century.
The past 25 holders of the world record for the 100m have been black and data compiled in 2007 revealed that 494 of the 500 best-ever 100m times were recorded by black athletes.
The 200m will doubtless be won by a black man tomorrow, too.
Usain Bolt is the hot favourite and Yohan Blake, his countryman from Jamaica, could take silver, as he did in the 100m.
Christophe Lemaitre, of France, who today qualified for the final with a time of 20.03, is, perhaps, the only white man in with a possibility of making the top five. And even that is a long shot.
The preponderance of blacks in the sprints led to a curious exchange on the BBC on the night of the 100m final. Allan Wells was asked by Gabby Logan to describe his emotions when he won the Olympic 100m final in Moscow in 1980.
The Scot started a sentence, reconsidered, started once more, and then paused again. If he had been as indecisive on the start line, he would not have made the final.
Eventually he said: "Well, that was the last time a white man was in the Olympic final. And I managed to win it as well."
As a statement of fact, it was incontestable, but Logan swiftly and wisely moved the conversation on.
She knew that beneath the surface of what was doubtless intended as an innocent observation lurked a ticking time bomb of political and scientific controversy.
When Lemaitre became the first white man to run under 10 seconds in the 100m in 2010, it was less a sporting story than an ideological one.
The Frenchman was dubbed "White Lightning" in the French press and asked a lot of questions about the "racial" distribution of success in sprinting.
He was also asked to comment on what this might tell us about the world beyond sport. Little wonder that the Frenchman has seemed, at times, a little bemused.
"We are used to seeing black people winning in the sprints, it has always been about colour, it's nothing new," he said in one interview, adding: "It's always just been black sprinters before because, physically, black people become stronger and faster younger than the rest of us.
"We always thought they were better built to be athletes than white people. But I think that's too stereotyped because if a white guy works hard, he can also achieve a lot."
The question that underpins the fascination with Lemaitre is a simple one: is the success of black sprinters based on a genetic advantage? For many, the answer is obvious.
What other explanation could there be for why blacks dominate an event that is both objective and transparent?
Anything less than an unequivocal "yes" is a testament to the power of political correctness.
But take a look at the data once more: 494 of the 500 fastest times were achieved by black sprinters. But there is something else about these men. Almost all of them were either born in West Africa or can trace their forebears to that region.
In other words, East, Southern and other Africans have had almost no success in the sprints whatsoever. But these athletes are black, too. The logical fallacy is a simple one. When we say "blacks" are better at sprinting, we are indulging in an unstated generalisation.
"Black" is a term that contains all sorts of variety, genetic and otherwise. The pygmies in central Africa, the Nandi and the Masai all have black skin pigmentation. However, they are, in anatomical terms, very different. To watch a tiny subset of dark-skinned people succeed in a particular event and to infer that this superiority is shared by all dark-skinned people is to go way beyond the available evidence.
Even if we were to redefine sprinting supremacy as a West African trait, we will still confront obvious problems.
Not a single sprinting medal has been won at the Olympic Games or the World Championships by Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, Sierra Leone, the Republic of Guinea, Liberia, Ivory Coast, Togo, Niger, Benin, Mali, the Gambia, Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, Gabon, Senegal, Congo and Angola. Yet these are all West African states.
Success in modern sprinting has, in fact, been concentrated among two population groups: Jamaicans and African Americans. It may be that these two groups have a natural advantage (whether on average in the population or among their fastest sprinters, or both). But this is a world away from the assertion that blacks in general are better sprinters.
Research undertaken in 2003 found that variation in a particular gene called ACTN3 is associated with sprinting success (through its impact on fast-twitch muscle fibres), and that the "sprint" version of this gene is more common among Jamaicans than other populations.
This led to headlines suggesting that Jamaican sprinting success is hereditary. A recent book by a leading French journalist has also made this claim.
But the reality is more complex. Although 98 per cent of Jamaicans have the relevant gene, so, too, do 82 per cent of Europeans. In other words, both these populations have a huge majority of individuals with an ACTN3 gene conducive to sprinting success.
Further research has found that Kenyans (who win distance events but have virtually no success in sprinting) have an even higher frequency of the relevant gene than Jamaicans.
It turns out that most of the genetic diversity within mankind is contained within racial groups, rather than between them. At these Olympics, blacks, who have often been under-represented in swimming events, have started making it into the US team.
It is possible, although not certain, that patterns of national dominance in swimming and athletics will change over time, as the popularity of different sports shift.
What is certain is that the very notion of "black" athletic superiority is deeply misguided.
The Times
What isn't deeply misguided, is the notion that Rollins failed to prove that she was a clean Olympic champion on three separate occasions. In fact, she avoided testing like the plague, in the first instance. Ergo gtfo.
Lydiard is God wrote:
The nub, knob, is that blacks have talent, and then cheat harder than anyone else. Whites give up because they are fooled into thinking they missed out on some fictitious genetic lottery.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/5d/ed/77/5ded77fcf38e8f5d6b0f587a3affa9da.jpg
Sure, now tell us why does Russians before their blanket ban, with their seas of doped long distance runners , weight throwers, lifters weren't competitive in the sprints.
they completely forgot steroids worked for sprints ? Because they are clearly aware of their efficacity in other events
This article is at least as PC as the "leftist drivel" that you claim to regurly see.
1/3 of the country mentionned as West African are not located in "West Africa", the other third have actually produced medallist in the aformentionned championships.
Try to read book about forensic medecine, they've been dissecting bodies and analysing their muscle composition since the last century...
She should immediately leave L.A. and train and live where there are few test takers. Places like Dallas, Boston, Portland, Atlanta are the best places where you can hide and evade test takers.
getso wrote:
Lydiard is God wrote:The nub, knob, is that blacks have talent, and then cheat harder than anyone else. Whites give up because they are fooled into thinking they missed out on some fictitious genetic lottery.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/5d/ed/77/5ded77fcf38e8f5d6b0f587a3affa9da.jpgSure, now tell us why does Russians before their blanket ban, with their seas of doped long distance runners , weight throwers, lifters weren't competitive in the sprints.
they completely forgot steroids worked for sprints ? Because they are clearly aware of their efficacity in other events
Russians are very manly, and prefer wrestling bears to running away from them.
You do realise that explosive throws and lifts require a lot of fast-twitch fibres too. They just prefer being big and strong, and doing that sort of stuff. I'm sure if they wanted to, they could come up with some fast male sprinters.
Privilova's 10.77 and 21.87 are ok, and there have been plenty of Eastern Euro fast women, where they did roid them up-Marita Koch even looked more or less like a woman.
BTW, I don't think anything that challenges black hegemony in anything is PC. Their lives do matter, you know.
Lydiard is God wrote:
Research undertaken in 2003 found that variation in a particular gene called ACTN3 is associated with sprinting success (through its impact on fast-twitch muscle fibres), and that the "sprint" version of this gene is more common among Jamaicans than other populations.
This led to headlines suggesting that Jamaican sprinting success is hereditary. A recent book by a leading French journalist has also made this claim.
But the reality is more complex. Although 98 per cent of Jamaicans have the relevant gene, so, too, do 82 per cent of Europeans. In other words, both these populations have a huge majority of individuals with an ACTN3 gene conducive to sprinting success.
All you really have to say to the "genetics" blowhards is "which genes?" They will either have nothing or this kind of dead-end.
There is NO evidence for a genetic source of athletic "talent." None. At. All.
a .02 difference in pb's from sally pearsons is hardly breezing past.
both dopers and the current record holder too
........................................................................................................
and all by the same peptide although record holder
had meldonium variant ,forget name ,too giving extra meter or so.
why such rubbish with banning it , so could get get similar molecule
yeah is mildronate alpha and control use for self and anglo /american sphere
with peptide adds extra half /full meter .
......................................................................................................
ALL these jamaicans and sprinters running very fast at age 15/16
all thanks to peptide igf-1 lr3 ........................
you know sprints very different to over decade ago
with wada / iaaf refusal to even mention it means that they are controling
its use . only conclusion possible. free for all on it , thats if can source it
they are controling the narrative of who runs fast ,
like with emergence of south african sprinters and especially chosen one
wadye in the 400m . obvious out here
or continue to do nothing in kenya but will keep dropping some positives
here and there
like when they provided carl lewis with hgh in 1981 years before anyone
or control as best ,who would used micera
you know that for years now there has been various agendas at large
within the organisation.
very like military and governmental agencies controling narcotics industry
while pretending to have there so called war on drugs.......................
You're aware that the reason is because females respond much better to hormonal doping...
edyour wrote:
You're aware that the reason is because females respond much better to hormonal doping...
Yes, that is obvious. Although a lot of them end up looking like blokes.
http://srocespodogona.blox.pl/resource/kratochvilova.jpgLydiard is God wrote:
You do realise that explosive throws and lifts require a lot of fast-twitch fibres too. They just prefer being big and strong, and doing that sort of stuff. I'm sure if they wanted to, they could come up with some fast male sprinters.
This post does not make any sense considering the fact that russians used to dominate until very recently racewalking better than anybody else, which is probably not the "manliest" event in track.
No direspect to racewalkers, they probably train hard but a sport which consists in walking by moving your hips like an ovulating (place the word of your choice here) they don't look manly at all.
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing