George213 wrote:You realize,of course, 100/200 and 400 are very different events, so mathematical conversion doesn't quite work here, right?
not when you started out as a 100/200 guy
that means enough "muscle-memory" to get close to under-distance, obviously 200 closer to 400 than 100, so 200 likely to be lot closer to theoretical than 100, but not likely by much
those rio conversions can never be proved but i am very happy with them & i no interest in wade