This is correct, but you'll never ever get the kenyan to admit to that. Hes like the brazilian who would call Brazils loss to Germany in the 2014 World Cup for "unlucky".
Manangoi managed to be within a second of world record pace in the first and last 400s (both 55s; wr pace is 54.8), so no, he didn't show that ability today.
You are pretty obsessed. Manangoi is likely 32 based on an article published here from a Letsrun correspondent in Kenya. Maybe not so shocking he is not in his prime. In 2017 when the article was written he ran 3:28.8 in old spikes with a sub-54 first and last lap (middle laps 57 pace). Poorly paced and likely in 3:27 type shape. He won Worlds so the season was a success. Also not on Fancy Bears was he unlike a certain brother of a famous runner.
Why is the question as to whether a former World Champion suspended for an anti-doping offense, was actually doping in his career, and making the occasional reference to it, an 'obsession'. Why are you using the type of language and shaming tactics the Jama Aden shills use here against anti-dopers like myself? You appear to be turning into Rekrunner. Is this 'obsession' the same type as your 'obsession' for who the 7th best 5000m runner in Ethiopia is?
So you think running 3:28.8 in old spikes, and not being able to break 3:36 in new spikes is evidence that he was not doping, despite being convicted of an anti-doping offence, and an obsession on my part?
Weird.
And Kenyans are older than their stated ages and everybody knows that when it comes to presenting a case to explain their remarkable decline not based on coming off the juice, but it's racist to accuse junior Kenyan athletes of being age cheats?
And being the brother of a white runner, and appearing on a dubious Russian hack likely authorized by Putin, is more evidence of doping than a Kenyan convicted of an anti-doping offence who runs 8 seconds slower in his comeback, despite posting on Social Media frequently of himself training his butt off and motivated to 'prove everybody wrong'?
So strange.
If nothing else, Manangoi's case is highly relevant to the general question as to whether we should ascribe guilt to athletes suspended for wheareabouts failures. You obviously fall in the Rekrunner/Jama Aden shill camp. Unless you just have a peculiar obsession for Elijah.
That World Record targetting Kenyans can't even beat 17 year old Australian kids when they are off the juice.
You are pretty obsessed. Manangoi is likely 32 based on an article published here from a Letsrun correspondent in Kenya. Maybe not so shocking he is not in his prime. In 2017 when the article was written he ran 3:28.8 in old spikes with a sub-54 first and last lap (middle laps 57 pace). Poorly paced and likely in 3:27 type shape. He won Worlds so the season was a success. Also not on Fancy Bears was he unlike a certain brother of a famous runner.
A little comment to your last comment about Henrik Ingebrigtsen: Yes, he was on the Fancy Bears list. And rumours have it that comments to his blood pass was “has to be followed up”, where other rumours say “suspicious”… The main MD of the Norwegian team (not team Ingebrigtsen’s or Henrik’s personal doctor) who also is obligated to watch out for any signs of doping said that Henrik’s blood pass was totally consistent with his altitude training….
You are pretty obsessed. Manangoi is likely 32 based on an article published here from a Letsrun correspondent in Kenya. Maybe not so shocking he is not in his prime. In 2017 when the article was written he ran 3:28.8 in old spikes with a sub-54 first and last lap (middle laps 57 pace). Poorly paced and likely in 3:27 type shape. He won Worlds so the season was a success. Also not on Fancy Bears was he unlike a certain brother of a famous runner.
Why is the question as to whether a former World Champion suspended for an anti-doping offense, was actually doping in his career, and making the occasional reference to it, an 'obsession'. Why are you using the type of language and shaming tactics the Jama Aden shills use here against anti-dopers like myself? You appear to be turning into Rekrunner. Is this 'obsession' the same type as your 'obsession' for who the 7th best 5000m runner in Ethiopia is?
So you think running 3:28.8 in old spikes, and not being able to break 3:36 in new spikes is evidence that he was not doping, despite being convicted of an anti-doping offence, and an obsession on my part?
Weird.
And Kenyans are older than their stated ages and everybody knows that when it comes to presenting a case to explain their remarkable decline not based on coming off the juice, but it's racist to accuse junior Kenyan athletes of being age cheats?
And being the brother of a white runner, and appearing on a dubious Russian hack likely authorized by Putin, is more evidence of doping than a Kenyan convicted of an anti-doping offence who runs 8 seconds slower in his comeback, despite posting on Social Media frequently of himself training his butt off and motivated to 'prove everybody wrong'?
So strange.
If nothing else, Manangoi's case is highly relevant to the general question as to whether we should ascribe guilt to athletes suspended for wheareabouts failures. You obviously fall in the Rekrunner/Jama Aden shill camp. Unless you just have a peculiar obsession for Elijah.
So doping turns a 3.36 runner into a 3.28-29 runner. Wait - is this the Nordas/Katir thread? Funny that ...
Given his positive drug test, I've restored the 2nd post in this thread which was deleted by one of our moderators. It is above.
We got a call from World Athletics recently as a top pro was upset people were talking about them being a potential doper. Normally we allow that talk. Someone clearly dind't 6years ago and now they look like a fool.
Given his positive drug test, I've restored the 2nd post in this thread which was deleted by one of our moderators. It is above.
We got a call from World Athletics recently as a top pro was upset people were talking about them being a potential doper. Normally we allow that talk. Someone clearly dind't 6years ago and now they look like a fool.
This is actually insane. If a pro is clean, why would they care about speculation on them doping?
You are pretty obsessed. Manangoi is likely 32 based on an article published here from a Letsrun correspondent in Kenya. Maybe not so shocking he is not in his prime. In 2017 when the article was written he ran 3:28.8 in old spikes with a sub-54 first and last lap (middle laps 57 pace). Poorly paced and likely in 3:27 type shape. He won Worlds so the season was a success. Also not on Fancy Bears was he unlike a certain brother of a famous runner.
Why is the question as to whether a former World Champion suspended for an anti-doping offense, was actually doping in his career, and making the occasional reference to it, an 'obsession'. Why are you using the type of language and shaming tactics the Jama Aden shills use here against anti-dopers like myself? You appear to be turning into Rekrunner. Is this 'obsession' the same type as your 'obsession' for who the 7th best 5000m runner in Ethiopia is?
So you think running 3:28.8 in old spikes, and not being able to break 3:36 in new spikes is evidence that he was not doping, despite being convicted of an anti-doping offence, and an obsession on my part?
Weird.
And Kenyans are older than their stated ages and everybody knows that when it comes to presenting a case to explain their remarkable decline not based on coming off the juice, but it's racist to accuse junior Kenyan athletes of being age cheats?
And being the brother of a white runner, and appearing on a dubious Russian hack likely authorized by Putin, is more evidence of doping than a Kenyan convicted of an anti-doping offence who runs 8 seconds slower in his comeback, despite posting on Social Media frequently of himself training his butt off and motivated to 'prove everybody wrong'?
So strange.
If nothing else, Manangoi's case is highly relevant to the general question as to whether we should ascribe guilt to athletes suspended for wheareabouts failures. You obviously fall in the Rekrunner/Jama Aden shill camp. Unless you just have a peculiar obsession for Elijah.
Anti-dopers like yourself? You are not an anti-doper.
You are defending suspicious guys like the Ingebrigtsens or Nordas exactly like some others defend Katir or some Kenyans.
You are a liar . You are stupid. You are a racist. You are a doping apologist.