Regular Poster wrote:
Which is worse: finding out a girl smokes, or finding out she has tattoos? Both are dealbreaker's for me, but smokes is worse for sure.
You can always quit smoking, which often happens when a woman has a child.
Regular Poster wrote:
Which is worse: finding out a girl smokes, or finding out she has tattoos? Both are dealbreaker's for me, but smokes is worse for sure.
You can always quit smoking, which often happens when a woman has a child.
TrackCoach wrote:
Regular Poster wrote:Which is worse: finding out a girl smokes, or finding out she has tattoos? Both are dealbreaker's for me, but smokes is worse for sure.
You can always quit smoking, which often happens when a woman has a child.
My mamma didn't have to quit smoking when she had me. Mamma also has my name tattooed on her thigh right next to all of her baby daddy's names.
TrackCoach wrote:
Regular Poster wrote:Which is worse: finding out a girl smokes, or finding out she has tattoos? Both are dealbreaker's for me, but smokes is worse for sure.
You can always quit smoking, which often happens when a woman has a child.
Not so for someone that syarted smoking in their teens.
and you wanna see fugly, find a lifelong smoker with lots of tats over the age of forty.
yikes! Everything's dried out, is saggy and wrinkled.
John Utah wrote:
Jfhrj effed wrote:Finding out she voted for Trump. I'd rather find out she did porn.
logic error here. Trump-voting women are attracted to men, therefore she would not be attracted to you, therefore not your girlfriend.
Keep working on your savagery, you're almost there.
Both are a major no for me. Also if she does yoga
Jfhrj effed wrote:
John Utah wrote:logic error here. Trump-voting women are attracted to men, therefore she would not be attracted to you, therefore not your girlfriend.
Keep working on your savagery, you're almost there.
Probably that she's got herpes.
And now you do, too.
jamin wrote:
I don't find that tattoos ever make a woman more physically attractive, but as long as they are small and few they don't detract from physical attractiveness and they have a "signalling" effect that can enhance overall attractiveness if what you're looking for is a free-spirited woman.
jamin, very disappointed in you.
"Remember Chris, if she smokes, she pokes." - Lois Griffin
tattoos are for the weak minded followers
Wise words my friend
Where is the thread set up by a woman giving the two qualities she doesn't like about you. I do not see anything close to the number of women posting about a man's looks versus the number of men posting about a woman's appearance.
Florenda Gonzales wrote:
exthrower wrote:Nothing screams out 'low class' like a tattoo.....unless it's tiny and not visible...
Tattoos do no "scream out lie class" , whether tiny or big especially when they represent a deep meaning to the tattoo bearer. But small minds are out there everywhere. Smoking on the other hand does. I'm a well educated 55 year old with meaningful tattoos and of course you are entitled to your opinion even though it does indicate you may be small minded and judgemental....just saying
Tattoos definitely scream low class. No question. Lots of things scream low class, tattoos are one of them.
John Utah wrote:
Tattoos definitely scream low class. No question. Lots of things scream low class, tattoos are one of them.
You are such an idiot. Someone else said it, but I agree, you are angling for number one fool on letsrun. You are A low class fool.
I dislike tattoos, for me, but I'm not stupid enough to think that everyone with a tattoo is somehow the same in any way, other than having a tattoo. Barry Goldwater had a tattoo, that tells me nothing about him and I don't judge him even a little bit because of it.
Aqua man wrote:
This board amazes me.
Women have tattoos, they look great.
I would venture that 30% of women in America have tattoos.
This reminds me of the thread 'does anybody on the board own a pick up truck, it's so redneck'.
The F 150 outsells any other vehicle.
Are you folks all rich white suburban fathers and sons in this board?
(This seems pretty obvious as posters are far more concerned about grammar than content)
re: "I would venture that 30% of women in America have tattoos."
Are you crazy, less than 1% of women in America have a tattoo. Obviously, there certain groups of where 30% of them might have a tattoo, but among the general population, that consist of doctors, lawyers, teachers, mothers, deeply religious, middle age, old age, etc. There are many women who would not think of getting a tattoo. Obviously if you go out to a dance club or certain college campuses, etc., you might find lots of tattoos.
Smokes are worse but man some tattoos are hideously ugly. Both are anti-Viagra.
Crazy?
Well coach, 45% of women under 35 years of age have tattoos.
Throw as many searches as you want.
Sooo, not sure what you need to do next other than;
1. Accept reality
2. Refer to 1
In the lead wrote:
John Utah wrote:Tattoos definitely scream low class. No question. Lots of things scream low class, tattoos are one of them.
You are such an idiot. Someone else said it, but I agree, you are angling for number one fool on letsrun. You are A low class fool.
Doesn't matter what you call him. He's correct. Tattoos do scream low class.
real life reminder wrote:
In the lead wrote:You are such an idiot. Someone else said it, but I agree, you are angling for number one fool on letsrun. You are A low class fool.
Doesn't matter what you call him. He's correct. Tattoos do scream low class.
You is telling me the chubby broad on American Pickers ain't high class?
Yes women are completely and totally sexual creatures for my perverse gratification.... and theirs, you repressive misogynist!