Is Isaiah Harris time questionable considering that he is a sophomore? Isn't this stealing away from legitimate aged sophomores? Just a joke if you know where I am heading to
Is Isaiah Harris time questionable considering that he is a sophomore? Isn't this stealing away from legitimate aged sophomores? Just a joke if you know where I am heading to
Big fat qualifier wrote:
There will be lots and lots of sub 1:46 guys that have hit 1:15 or faster outdoors in training
I told you. 1:15 is not a big deal in the elite sport. Without a doubt top guys will have hit sub 1:15 in training.
Any speed based 1:45/1:46 runner can do it.
Indoors makes it more difficult, of course.
Korir ran a very good record race and has potential to go even lower.
800ftw. wrote:It's very easy to get the splits calculo
no it's not
You can see the clock display 11 seconds
yes
& what distance has he covered by "11s" ?
If you watch the video on a computer video editing software you can note down that time and work out the splits using the footage
then impress us
It's really very easy
sure
then what distance at "11s"?
seeing as you can't offer 100% accuracy with tv clock, what do you offer ?
impress us
what are his 200 & 400 splits ?
You could even do it with a crude method of pausing the video when you see the clock
is this a joke ???
and then starting a stopwatch as you click play on the video
are you intent on totally insulting the board ???
do you assume 0.01s to 0.01s transfer from race clock to a phone clock then transferred to a vid site ???
Just go and do it yourself
why woud i waste my time with such corrupted endeavour ?
From when 11.x seconds (I don't remember exactly now) shows on the clock
check
Korir crosses the 400m mark 38s later
when ??
huge amount of uncertainty in vague analysis & nowhere near 200m line at either time
you have offered vague nonsensical time based on no solid running clock
if you want to impress board, offer freeze-frame split times to 0.1s
You can also use this to calculate the first 200m
not using same method !
i want 0.1s accuracy
49 mid is a solid pace for a ~1:15
but you can claim no such split
i don't want fantasy, i want split
You can work out his last 200m with a stop watch calculo.
is this a joke ???
what is video transfer error ???
I got 25 low over and over, it's easy
is this a joke ???
you expect me to trust phone-vid clockings to even 0.25s accuracy ???
don't insult board
You can see exactly when he crosses the line at the start and end of the lap from the same angle
no running clock & laughable to assume 0.01s to 0.01s transfer from phone to vid
The guy racing next to him dies badly and so Korir looks extra spectacular
eh ???
is this a joke ???
without authentic split at 400, you have no idea if he was running 51 or 52 at 400 but got blown away in last 200 by incredible kick from Korir
You can check the first 200m against the previous method I put forwards by taking away the easily timed last 400m from the total finishing time
is this a joke ???
no verifiable clocking at 200 at 400 & you claim nonsensical splits for no known distance into race !
what clocking are you offering for a "supposed distance" ???
I can read, thank you
not well
but that doesn't mean I accept your opinions
no one asked you to
but your analysis was insult
offer me Korir's
200 split to 0.2s ?
400 split to 0.2s ?
The 600m is not the 800m
eh ???
why you telling me ???
it's absurd to assume they have same ideal splits as 400 or 800...
Why does it matter how much distance is covered at 11s? This is basic maths.
If you start timing at 11s when you can see the clock on the video, then let the film play until the runner crosses the 400m mark, 38s passes.
11+38 = 49
You can do it in a lot more detail on video software but the method is the same
jjjjj wrote:Abq altitude of about 1 mile above sea level gives an advantage at 800 on down--or, no argument
is this a joke ???
what is nairobi 800m record ???
when was it set & by whom ???
why is it not
~ 1'40.5
if you were capable of deducing the maths, ~5'000' slows a 800 by ~ 0.2s from consideration of opposing hypoxia / < drag
600m down
no
it woud be likely neutral for 600m
kenyans have ancient 44.1 or 44.2 record from '92 games, faster than euro record, so innate speed is no problem for 600 unlike ethiopians
kenyan 800 record back in '92 was an ancient 1'42.28, so work out improvement what kenyan 400 shoud be today...
Korir is clearly much older than most freshmen
eh ???
he looks raw kid to me
i see young africans every day & he looks 18y to me
anyhows, any ole boy who smashes 20y ole WR over 600 shouda had years of 1'42 / 1'44s going back at least 3y
where are Korir's 1'42 / 1'44s for past 3 - 5y ???
or was content to "cotton-pick" or "chicken-feed" when he couda been earning $ 30 - 100k/year with that ability ???
or is he actually 18 / 19y ?
Overaged freshman is not a misnomer
i seen plenty of young africans
he looks 18y
because it means that someone is older than the normal freshman, which is 18 for much of the year and 19 for the remainder
is 101 your remit ?!
He will likely be a force outdoors
0.1% force or a 95% one ???
offer precision...
( mods : kindly store those last 2 reposes for posterity :
i'm sure i read the "101/ remit" somewhere, but if original, i apologise, but that last one of "force" is original & sure worth some salvation :
finally insist some quantification to "maybe/likely" ? )
800ftw. wrote:
Why does it matter how much distance is covered at 11s? This is basic maths.
If you start timing at 11s when you can see the clock on the video, then let the film play until the runner crosses the 400m mark, 38s passes.
11+38 = 49
You can do it in a lot more detail on video software but the method is the same
I swear you are like a maths prof or something.
How can you not understand that lol.
This is embarrassing from calculo. Fails maths 101
Venty Benty wrote:
800ftw. wrote:
Why does it matter how much distance is covered at 11s? This is basic maths.
If you start timing at 11s when you can see the clock on the video, then let the film play until the runner crosses the 400m mark, 38s passes.
11+38 = 49
You can do it in a lot more detail on video software but the method is the same
I swear you are like a maths prof or something.
How can you not understand that lol
because you have no idea what speed the initial 11s was run in & therefore no idea of what 11s into vid means for distance run
even more laughable when start not shown
for all we know, they couda jogged the initial "11s" pushing 400 clocking well above 52
Mrr82 wrote:He did have to waste some energy
no
he wasted lotta energy by swerving wide suddenly on a bend & also losing huge amount of momentum
but it's a bit outlandish to say he didn't go out hard given he ran the 2nd fastest time ever
no
totally irrelevant what his clocking was, it was what he shouda run !!!
the guy has fantastic 400 wheels for a kid, I believe he has a 45+ relay leg, better or as good as anyone in field, so jogging for last early on threw away huge amounts of time
it is same principle as a 45.00 / 1'43.00 guy who jogs 1st lap in a fast 800 of 52.00 & kills himself in last 400 for 1'44-low/mid
he will never come back in 49.00s because of physiology, so all he has done by going out in 52.00 is throw away truck-loads from his 800 potential time
all Kid did by running like a total wimp for most of race was throw away truck-loads of time, even with the "Herschel Walker" shoulder-charge
it's analysis of race & clocking, totally irrelevant of what the time's significance may or may not be
and it was nothing like an outdoors 800 for a guy with his pr
is this a joke ???
the kid likely has 45+ outdoor speed
what on earth is he doing dead-f*%#cking last early on in a 2-man race ???
he totally wimped out start of his race as no confidence/ability in his 600 potential
He probably didn't expect sub 1:15....
it's not a race anyone bothers analyses, but he was capable of 1'14-flat if he hammered it sensibly from gun but not wimped it to 400
let alone attempting 1:14 flat...
he can do it next time...
So let's chill on the terrible run ridiculousness
eh ???
why ???
Kid ran a sensational run of huge handicaps off
- jog to 400
he threw away buckets of time just there
- huge loss of momentum suddenly swerving wide on a bend
- extra distance wide on bend
he is currently a
~ 1'14.00i
Next time he'll probably go out faster knowing how fast he's ready to run.
yes
& he shoud be aiming for
~ 1'14.00i