And so it begins:
Not that I need any vindication, because I am just fine with being wrong, but a presidential election win as a result of cheating is not a win.
We shall see what the truth brings.
For you Republicans who supported Trump, when does all this winning that he promised begin?
Too stupid to tell the difference between wiretapping and incidental collection?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
There WAS surveillance and Trump was right. Meanwhile Jake "Fake News" Tapper scrambles to spin and parse words:
"Nunes was clear to say this was not wiretapping of Trump at Trump Tower as POTUS charged." - yeah right, Jake. Spying is spying, deal with it.
EXCERPT:
REPORTER: “Do you believe the President appropriately used the word 'wiretapping?' Was it used correctly in his tweets, based on the information that you have seen?â€
NUNES: “I think the wiretapping, if you use it generally like the President has said, he clearly used it differently than what I think a lot of people took it which was did Obama actually wiretap the Trump Tower, which we know didn’t happen. I think the President has been pretty clear on that.â€
REPORTER: “But the physical act of the wiretapping, do you see anything —“
NUNES: “No, and I said that on day two.â€
REPORTER: “Can you rule out the possibility that senior Obama Administration officials were involved in this?â€
NUNES: “No, I cannot.â€
https://grabien.com/story.php?id=95469
Flagpole wrote:
And so it begins:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/22/politics/us-officials-info-suggests-trump-associates-may-have-coordinated-with-russians/index.htmlNot that I need any vindication, because I am just fine with being wrong, but a presidential election win as a result of cheating is not a win.
We shall see what the truth brings.
For you Republicans who supported Trump, when does all this winning that he promised begin?
Hilarious, you decide to reappear now. You have as much credibility as the Clinton News Network. None.
Too stupid to discern parsing of words. Spying is spying.
Agip Detector wrote:
Agip Detector wrote:This one from Agip was when the fist little crack began to appear at 7:53pm on Election Night:
"uh oh
michigan is starting to break red
betting odds for MI are now 65/35 for HRC"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Then, at 9:23pm, the Left starts turning on themselves out of frustration, as T ReXXX humiliates Flagpole, after Flagpole had gone silent for about 2 hours:
"down to 44% on 538.
NOT looking good. NOT at all.
Flagpole's idiocy being fully on display is almost worth this. But....no, nothing is.
Guaranteed prediction: in 4 years from now, all the Trump fans/defenders will have abandoned him and say "I didn't vote for Trump, I voted 3rd party! I never liked the guy, I was a Cruz guy" or some such nonsense. The same thing happened with Bush. You all had his back, all got him elected, and then.....pretended you never did. You support an unqualified idiot or joker, and then when he is a disaster, you wipe your hands of him and pretend you had nothing to do with it."
Deplorable."
That's by far the most common and weakest explanation I hear. If you voted for anyone, you own it fully. Saying its because Hillary was crooked is a ridiculous excuse, you shouldn't have shown up then. I didn't like Hillary but I voted for her knowing without a sliver of a doubt she would be the status quo president and who know what grey area $hit she was going to getting herself into. Still I owned that. Now own what that orange-haired blowhard is doing to this country, don't cherry pick, own it all.
exthrower wrote:
eric a blair wrote:trump was not right. There was no phone tap on trump tower. EVERYONE denies that.
trump and other officials seem to have been caught up in incidental surveillance - meaning they were talking on the phone to people who had warrants out on them.
who were they talking to? And why were they talking to people the IC and FISA judge thought needed surveilling?
that's the question now.
as for nunes - he is supposed to be overseeing the WH, not helping them along. This is a massive breakdown in the system.
C'mon, stop parsing words....Trumps communications were monitored. I call that wiretapping and so do most people. And the NSA did it and Obama controled the NSA....Honesty and forthrightness seems to be a quality sorely lacking in liberals....
You are a dumb dumb if you think they are the same things. Lucky for your president, a majority of the fat uneducated citizens would agree with you. Must be nice being dumb and oblivious.
Trump was right that Islam is an engine of hate and destruction.
Trump was right that we need a ban on terrorist breeding grounds.
Trump was right that he has been under surveillance (Project Dragnet), and the evidence will continue to mount.
Trump was right that the Russian "collusion" narrative is false.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Too stupid to discern parsing of words. Spying is spying.
You do understand there is a difference right? Each involves a completely different process; you do get that right? Or has the conspiracist in you taken full control?
leimee wrote:
Trump was right that Islam is an engine of hate and destruction.
Trump was right that we need a ban on terrorist breeding grounds.
Trump was right that he has been under surveillance (Project Dragnet), and the evidence will continue to mount.
Trump was right that the Russian "collusion" narrative is false.
It's a good thing you annouced those are truths, otherwise how would we ever believe them?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Flagpole wrote:And so it begins:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/22/politics/us-officials-info-suggests-trump-associates-may-have-coordinated-with-russians/index.htmlNot that I need any vindication, because I am just fine with being wrong, but a presidential election win as a result of cheating is not a win.
We shall see what the truth brings.
For you Republicans who supported Trump, when does all this winning that he promised begin?
Hilarious, you decide to reappear now. You have as much credibility as the Clinton News Network. None.
I have been posting for a while now. Didn't just reappear now. Don't take your truth cues from Trump and the White House. Cheaters don't get to keep their gold medals...tick, tick, tick.
The beauty of the dying liberal agenda is that liberals are too pompous, self-deluded, and hive-minded to ever acknowledge their demise. They continue to believe a largely discredited media that told them Hillary had a 97% chance of winning by likely securing 323 electoral votes. The vast swath of the country supports Trump. He won ~5 times as many counties and ~80 more electoral votes. But liberals don't like this, liberals want the popular vote to suddenly mean victory, because liberals don't like liberals having hurt feelings, so therefore the rules of the game must be changed to soothe said liberals...
Liberals generally exist in population centers where they are crammed in like ants in a hill, cogs in a machine. They are a hivemind. This is why they were dumbfounded by November 8th. They don't understand reality outside their congested echochambers because they don't acknowledge reality outside their congested echochambers. They look down upon blue collar workers, and believe that being pseudo-intellectual and being intelligent are one in the same. Meanwhile they continue to abuse political tactics that have demonstrably failed (lost the election, lost 1000+ seats during Obama years, and still don't hold either house or senate).
A smart man once said that trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. Thus, the question seriously becomes: is liberalism a mental disorder? Given what we've seen with all their failed hysterical attempts to subvert Trump at every turn, one might also ask: are liberals doomed for extinction?
If the beta males and asexual feminists among liberals have anything to say, I'd answer (resoundingly) "YES" to both questions.
TroLLminator wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:Too stupid to discern parsing of words. Spying is spying.
You do understand there is a difference right? Each involves a completely different process; you do get that right? Or has the conspiracist in you taken full control?
You need to explain it in a way that RFH might undersrand.
Suppose a news crew was filming the arrival of a couple of pandas to the local new, and then in the background someone was incidentally videotaped committing a murder. That is what has happened apparently with Trump and/or his associates. Obama did not authorize that Trump or his campaign be monitored.
Soon we will have President Pence, unless he is involved too. Too bad the law isn't that the person who came in second doesn't get to be president...like would be the case in the Olympics; if someone wins gold and then later is found to have cheated, they lose the gold and the silver place winner gets the gold.
Flagpole wrote:
Soon we will have President Pence, unless he is involved too.
really?? another qualified prediction from the omniscient Flaccidpole? can't you just go away and stay away?
leimee wrote:
The beauty of the dying liberal agenda is that liberals are too pompous, self-deluded, and hive-minded to ever acknowledge their demise. They continue to believe a largely discredited media that told them Hillary had a 97% chance of winning by likely securing 323 electoral votes. The vast swath of the country supports Trump. He won ~5 times as many counties and ~80 more electoral votes. But liberals don't like this, liberals want the popular vote to suddenly mean victory, because liberals don't like liberals having hurt feelings, so therefore the rules of the game must be changed to soothe said liberals...
Liberals generally exist in population centers where they are crammed in like ants in a hill, cogs in a machine. They are a hivemind. This is why they were dumbfounded by November 8th. They don't understand reality outside their congested echochambers because they don't acknowledge reality outside their congested echochambers. They look down upon blue collar workers, and believe that being pseudo-intellectual and being intelligent are one in the same. Meanwhile they continue to abuse political tactics that have demonstrably failed (lost the election, lost 1000+ seats during Obama years, and still don't hold either house or senate).
A smart man once said that trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. Thus, the question seriously becomes: is liberalism a mental disorder? Given what we've seen with all their failed hysterical attempts to subvert Trump at every turn, one might also ask: are liberals doomed for extinction?
If the beta males and asexual feminists among liberals have anything to say, I'd answer (resoundingly) "YES" to both questions.
You need to move beyond Nov. 8. Trump and his White House are in chaos, and again, I ask, when does the winning start? He has lost at every significant thing has has attempted so far except for spending millions of taxpayer dollars to play golf in Florida just about every weekend.
lolololol wrote:
Flagpole wrote:Soon we will have President Pence, unless he is involved too.
really?? another qualified prediction from the omniscient Flaccidpole? can't you just go away and stay away?
Dude, the info has just started to come out today. Put your head in the sand if you like, but Trump will not make it to the end of his first term. Tick, tick, tick.
exthrower wrote:
eric a blair wrote:trump was not right. There was no phone tap on trump tower. EVERYONE denies that.
trump and other officials seem to have been caught up in incidental surveillance - meaning they were talking on the phone to people who had warrants out on them.
who were they talking to? And why were they talking to people the IC and FISA judge thought needed surveilling?
that's the question now.
as for nunes - he is supposed to be overseeing the WH, not helping them along. This is a massive breakdown in the system.
C'mon, stop parsing words....Trumps communications were monitored. I call that wiretapping and so do most people. And the NSA did it and Obama controled the NSA....Honesty and forthrightness seems to be a quality sorely lacking in liberals....
no not at all.
Let's say the russian ambassador has a FISA warrant out on him and the CIA was listening to his calls.
Let's say the ambassador calls DFF. DFF chats about liberals.
DFF is caught on that recording. It doesn't mean that DFF was being monitored.
Normally DFF's name would be masked, unless his real name was necessary to understand the conversation.
So NO TRUMP WAS NOT BEING MONITORED
leimee wrote:
If the beta males and asexual feminists among liberals have anything to say, I'd answer (resoundingly) "YES" to both questions.
Just because a girl prefers a guy of the same intellect doesn't make her asexual. And there isn't much evolutionary advantage to being an alpha in our society. It's purely an emotional appeal. Almost all of the young, self-made entrepreneurs are betas.
leimee wrote:
The beauty of the dying liberal agenda is that liberals are too pompous, self-deluded, and hive-minded to ever acknowledge their demise. They continue to believe a largely discredited media that told them Hillary had a 97% chance of winning by likely securing 323 electoral votes. The vast swath of the country supports Trump. He won ~5 times as many counties and ~80 more electoral votes. But liberals don't like this, liberals want the popular vote to suddenly mean victory, because liberals don't like liberals having hurt feelings, so therefore the rules of the game must be changed to soothe said liberals...
Liberals generally exist in population centers where they are crammed in like ants in a hill, cogs in a machine. They are a hivemind. This is why they were dumbfounded by November 8th. They don't understand reality outside their congested echochambers because they don't acknowledge reality outside their congested echochambers. They look down upon blue collar workers, and believe that being pseudo-intellectual and being intelligent are one in the same. Meanwhile they continue to abuse political tactics that have demonstrably failed (lost the election, lost 1000+ seats during Obama years, and still don't hold either house or senate).
A smart man once said that trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. Thus, the question seriously becomes: is liberalism a mental disorder? Given what we've seen with all their failed hysterical attempts to subvert Trump at every turn, one might also ask: are liberals doomed for extinction?
If the beta males and asexual feminists among liberals have anything to say, I'd answer (resoundingly) "YES" to both questions.
lol @ the dwumpfkin
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/22/politics/us-officials-info-suggests-trump-associates-may-have-coordinated-with-russians/it's looking like the bill will pass the house - ryan is giving in to the conservatives.
but that makes the bill unpassable in the senate.
so then becomes the sausage factory of lawmaking to fashion a compromise agreed upon by the house and senate.
the joke is that ryan is changing the bill so much that there will obvi be no CBO score until after the vote. Nuts.
Ryan just wants to get a bill, any bill, through the house. Then let the senate f around with it.
eric a blair wrote:
it's looking like the bill will pass the house - ryan is giving in to the conservatives.
but that makes the bill unpassable in the senate.
so then becomes the sausage factory of lawmaking to fashion a compromise agreed upon by the house and senate.
the joke is that ryan is changing the bill so much that there will obvi be no CBO score until after the vote. Nuts.
Ryan just wants to get a bill, any bill, through the house. Then let the senate f around with it.
Ryan is about the weakest spineless thing I've ever seen in politics. Good thing he's bursting his chances of ever becoming POTUS.
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these