DiscoGary wrote:
In fact I read the law she broke, and the law does not require intent for mishandling secrets. Simply doing it is a crime. Comey lied about the law when he said that not having intent meant that she should not be prosecuted. She absolutely broke the law and was not prosecuted because she is a powerful Democrat.
My facts >>> your talking points
"My facts" = I, Deplorable Gary, anonymouse (yes, mouse) Troll supreme laughingstock, with zero knowledge/education in legal matters, "read the law" and now wants to tell us all what it REALLY said.
My God, you are insufferable.
Here read this: it actually explains much of the issues/laws or potential issues/ laws involved. Probably way too long and complicated for you, so I'll skip to the conclusion (which was right)-
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/04/02/396823014/fact-check-hillary-clinton-those-emails-and-the-law"it's also unlikely she will ever be found to have violated the letter of the law."
(and went through a thorough explanation of why that is correct)
Here is a CATO institute (yes, libertarian group) analysis of case, that also concludes that she should not have been prosecuted:
https://www.cato.org/blog/server-will-bewitch-you-shortly"But we don’t need to resort to theorizing about political chicanery to explain why she wasn’t prosecuted for it: The simple answer is that—fortunately for all politicians—not every act of stupidity is a federal crime."
And of course there are many more that agree with those two. And of course there is the fact that ..
"as many as 20 agents, investigators, analysts and others within the FBI were assigned to the case and that they unanimously agreed charges were not warranted."
Yes, all 20 were part of a conspiracy, all 20 were staunch Hillary Clinton fans, all 20 were lying scum.
You're a joke Gary. Always have been, always will be.