The economy is starting to sag under Trump; after riding the coattails of Barack Obama, it's starting to show.
The economy is starting to sag under Trump; after riding the coattails of Barack Obama, it's starting to show.
DiscoGary wrote:
Predictions:
GDP growth under Trump will be greater than under Obama ....
GDP growth peaked at 2.6% under Obama. I will AVERAGE above that under Trump.
"peaked at 2.6%" ? Try again. we know gdp growth is measured by quarters.
There were several quarters that avg'd above 4% under Obama, including back to back quarters above 4.5% in 2014, and one above 5%. THAT was the peak. (TWICE as high as 2.6%). And as far as the arbitrary calendar year being the only marker for a "year", if you simply count 4 quarters in a row, twice Obama had years (4 quarter avg) with over 3% growth. So once again, of course you are being misleading. This all despite repubs blocking everything he tried to do, and pushing huge austerity measures as part of any deals.
2017: Trump's first year in office avg 2.5 %. This is NOT beating Obama's "peak" by any stretch (peak growth in 1 quarter: 5%. Peak growth for half year (2 quarters): 4.8%. Peak growth for a year (4 quarter avg) - TWICE over 3%.
Rigged for Trump wrote:
The economy is starting to sag under Trump; after riding the coattails of Barack Obama, it's starting to show.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/01/05/business/trump-first-year.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=image&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0&mtrref=www.facebook.com&gwh=005143A836A59F636BA1689EB2F22F15&gwt=pay
The stock market is a leading indicator so they should start the graph on election day, not inauguration day. There were a lot of gains as soon as he was elected.
GDP growth for an entire year.
Because racists typically trumpet how good a job they are doing for minorities. That’s just how they roll.
That’s how they do it wrote:
Because racists typically trumpet how good a job they are doing for minorities. That’s just how they roll.
https://www.npr.org/2018/01/06/576216793/president-trump-so-happy-black-unemployment-rate-at-a-historic-low
Hey look! One of my predictions just came true!
DiscoGary wrote:
BONUS prediction:
Liberals will be wrong. On everything! That's the one universal constant.
So funny Gary, but another big lie, of course, from the"Donald Trump is the greatest president ever since Washington!!! guy."
We were right about Iraq being a not-worth-the-cost mistake.
We were right about W. Bush being a crappy president.
We were right that not only would Obama's election not signal the "end of America!" (as so many on the right predicted), but would end with him being respected by the American people, by the world, by historians. All of that was true (he finished with a near 60% approval rate, despite these divided times. Let me remind, W. Bush finished HIS 2nd term mired in the low 20's.)
And we were right that Donald Trump, classless, lying, A-hole, racist that he is, would be an embarrassment to our nation, a stain on our history, and encouragement to white supremacists all over.
DiscoGary wrote:
GDP growth for an entire year.
Re-read:
""And as far as the arbitrary calendar year being the only marker for a "year", if you simply count 4 quarters in a row, twice Obama had years (**4 quarter avg** ) with over 3% growth. So once again, of course you are being misleading. "
Yes, you are being misleading. First of all, "peaks" certainly can be mesured by quarter. By that measure, you are way off. Secondly, while I understand that calendar year is typically used to represent a "year", 4 quarters in a row = a year. That's a fact. Obama twice had 4 quarter avg's of above 3%. fact.
Donny has started at a 2.5% 4 quarter avg, with peak of 3.2 %. Really not that great to get your panties wet over. Let's see where it goes from here.
Uh, your girl Hillary voted for the war with Iraq.
Obama is not being respected, he is being forgotten. He left a stain of corruption on our government and Trump is washing it out.
Trump has been making America great again, just like he said he would.
You are wrong.
... and BOOM! ANOTHER prediction comes true immediately!
Try again. This time provide specific metrics for your predictions. Otherwise, it's just hot air.
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
GDP growth for an entire year.
Re-read:
""And as far as the arbitrary calendar year being the only marker for a "year", if you simply count 4 quarters in a row, twice Obama had years (**4 quarter avg** ) with over 3% growth. So once again, of course you are being misleading. "
Yes, you are being misleading. First of all, "peaks" certainly can be mesured by quarter. By that measure, you are way off. Secondly, while I understand that calendar year is typically used to represent a "year", 4 quarters in a row = a year. That's a fact. Obama twice had 4 quarter avg's of above 3%. fact.
Donny has started at a 2.5% 4 quarter avg, with peak of 3.2 %. Really not that great to get your panties wet over. Let's see where it goes from here.
Spinning to find a way to make Obama's economy look good I see. It won't help. Reagan had a 4 quarter run where growth was over 8.5% for the year. Obama's economy was not good. I predict Trump's economy will be much better than Obama's when all the results are in.
That was pretty specific. Just about all the predictions about Trump made by Democrats/liberals have been proven untrue already, so simply getting close will put me way ahead of you.
DiscoGary wrote:
I predict Trump's economy will be much better than Obama's when all the results are in.
It'll have to be. He promised 4%!
And to whoever it was above who said that Obama is not respected: You're wrong. I never voted for him, for good reasons, and I expect historians will rate him only about a B- president at best (assuming average is a C); but I certainly respect him for the way he "wore" the office and represented the country. And having spoken with many internationals (and seen the relevant polls), I can tell you that around the world he is regarded as un homme sérieux.
Partly, of course, it's the old saying "contrast is everything" at work. Just as Trump's tenure has been making W. Bush look smarter and classier by comparison, so it has been polishing Obama's image.
Please explain the huge discrepancy between white college educated voters and non-white college educated voters who voted for Trump and Hillary.
Stats are funny...
What gets lost in all this uneducated (HS or less) voters supporting Trump is that that group only accounted for about 18% of the electorate and Trump only won 51/46% which means about 12 million people with HS diplomas or less voted for Trump and about 11 million voted for Clinton. Not really much of a mandate.
If you move the line for "educated voters" to those with "Associates Degree/Some College," a different picture develops in these two largest groups.
Associates Degree/Some College (32% of group) - Trump won group - 52% /43%
College Grad (32% of group) - Clinton won group - 49%/45%
Post-Grad (18% of group - same as HS or less) - Clinton won group - 58%/37%
So with "College Grad" and "Post-Grad" counted as "educated," 55% of Clinton's voters were educated compared to 46% of Trump's.
If you move the line to include "Associates Degree/Some College" as "educated" then 83% of Clinton's voters were "educated" compared to 80% of Trump's.[/quote]
It could also be that never trump republicans have lost their way.
Flagpole wrote:
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
Well, that's silly.
Really? Many people who voted for Trump hadn't voted in years or had voted Democrat before, and some who supported Bernie Sanders ended up voting for Trump. This is clearly not the Republican Party of even George W. Bush. Right now it is some amalgam of Far-right conservatives, racist white nationalists, evangelicals who have lost their way, some people who just want someone to take care of them, and some libertarians. It is the Trump Party now. A Party without George Will is not the Republican Party of old. Maybe reason will once again be a part of the Republican Party.
Ummm . . . ever heard if the DEEP STATE?
Ignorant sheeple!
Does this scoop mean that Wray will resign now? LOL.
Are you the best liberals can send to post this nonsense? Do you even comprehend what you are posting? I'm sure I can find 1 day where GDP was 30%.
DiscoGary wrote:
nontrumper wrote:
There's a reason members of the GOP have been complicit in the obstruction of the Mueller investigation: sleeping with the enemy. Russia $$$ to the GOP. Russia $$$ to the NRA to the GOP.
Why do you think Nunes has been such a pr*ck?! He's screwed and, therefore, desperate. Why are so many high ranking members of the GOP retiring? They're all cornered and fighting for their freedom. Can't do the time, don't do the crime.
Guys, the Russian collusion story was made up by the Hillary campaign the day after she lost as an excuse for her horrible performance as a candidate.
http://theduran.com/new-insider-book-reveals-hillary-clinton-made-up-russia-story-to-cover-up-lazy-pathetic-election-loss/
EXACTLY! Hillary Clinton is running EVERYTHING.
Comey? Mueller? Phfffftttt! Total pawns of QUEEN Hillary!
Wake up, sheeple!
nontrumper wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Guys, the Russian collusion story was made up by the Hillary campaign the day after she lost as an excuse for her horrible performance as a candidate.
http://theduran.com/new-insider-book-reveals-hillary-clinton-made-up-russia-story-to-cover-up-lazy-pathetic-election-loss/HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
So why then did Mueller (a life-long Republican) and 16 other investigators/prosecutors give up their better paying private law firm jobs? For a nothingburger, right?!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Country over party.
Two words for you, buddy. Deep. State.
Look it up. You might learn something.