That's not at all what I said. We do know that a large number of the counter protesters came with the explicit intent to use violence to shut down free speech at the rally. ALL of those people are bad. Really, REALLY bad.
I said I don't know if there were any counter protesters who came with peaceful intentions. Apparently you lack the intellectual capacity to understand conditional statements.
Does anyone think that the guy would have driven his car into the crowd if the counter protesters hadn't attacked rally? The violence started with the Antifa counter-protesters and escalated until that guy drove his car into the crowd.
I would ask my liberal friends here to reverse the situation and imagine how they would react if white supremacists showed up at a Black Lives Matter rally and literally beat them into silence while the cops stood by and let it happen. Then, as the two parties were dispersing, a BLM guy drove his car into the supremacists and killed one. How would you judge the BLM killer?
But I won't ask that because I know that my liberal friends are incapable of this kind of thinking. They can not use their imagination to put themselves in the other guy's shoes because the SJW agenda comes before principles. They believe their moral superiority gives them the right to deprive others of their rights, so they are always in the right, no matter who started the violence.