I think I just wrote a winning platform for the next democratic presidential candidate.
I think I just wrote a winning platform for the next democratic presidential candidate.
Night observer wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Occasionally, a Trumper might argue that he is great, but I've yet to hear anyone say he's honest.
Even Trump's mother wouldn't claim that he's honest.
I have heard many trump supporters say they that trump tells it like it is and they believe trump over any media reports.
If pressed about a particular lie, they will divert and say he is not as dishonest as crooked hillary.I
So yes they believe him to be honest for a poltician.
So yes they believe him to be "relatively honest". That's kind of pathetic.
There are plenty of politicians whose supporters simply describe as "honest", without qualification or equivocation. Trump is not one of those.
Night observer wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Occasionally, a Trumper might argue that he is great, but I've yet to hear anyone say he's honest.
Even Trump's mother wouldn't claim that he's honest.
I have heard many trump supporters say they that trump tells it like it is and they believe trump over any media reports.
If pressed about a particular lie, they will divert and say he is not as dishonest as crooked hillary.I
So yes they believe him to be honest for a poltician.
Yep, like you did with Hillary...an honest politician (see the links provided over the last jillion pages). Oh that's right, you ignore those and believe them to be fake news and debunked.
See how dumb I made you look there?
Haha, the sad part is, you are probably right.
Not really related to what you said, but one thing that I don't understand is the notion that higher taxes will cause people to want to work less. If I make 100k and you tax it at 25%, and then decide to increase the tax rate to 30%, I'm going to lose $5k. My response would not be to give up; assuming that I wanted the $5k, I would be incentivized to make another $7.14k so that I get the $5k back. I realize that there is an upper limit to how much tax/expense you can impose on a business before it becomes overwhelming, but I also don't think we need to ensure that companies make as much profit as possible.
No you didn't. But for a guy who knows very little about politics, what you did do was>>>>a great job of patting yourself on the back for little more than blah, blah, blah! Thank you Trump for winning and showing a bunch of dimwitted Democratic that they didn't know Jack squat about politics.
Wait what about media bias against our girl Hillary? Oh wait, that was against your guy and he still won.
Well what about having a husband who actually was the President and did great things while in Office. Oh wait, I forgot about reality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_ClintonArticle I charged that Clinton lied to the grand jury concerning:[20]
the nature and details of his relationship with Lewinsky
prior false statements he made in the Jones deposition
prior false statements he allowed his lawyer to make characterizing Lewinsky’s affidavit
his attempts to tamper with witnesses
Article III charged Clinton with attempting to obstruct justice in the Jones case by:[21]
encouraging Lewinsky to file a false affidavit
encouraging Lewinsky to give false testimony if and when she was called to testify
concealing gifts he had given to Lewinsky that had been subpoenaed
attempting to secure a job for Lewinsky to influence her testimony
permitting his lawyer to make false statements characterizing Lewinsky’s affidavit
attempting to tamper with the possible testimony of his secretary Betty Curie
making false and misleading statements to potential grand jury witnesses
All 45 Democrats in the Senate voted "not guilty" on both charges.
Well, that's not our girl, that's just her husband, she's innocent and unlike him, she never lies.
Democratic Response:
Why are you bringing up the Clintons? Yes, we wanted her to win and are pissed that she didn't, but she lost so why are you talking about her lies? Honestly, if she had won, we wouldn't had been bringing up Trump, okay yes we would have.
The top 3 Left Liberal posters on this thread are so delusional that I think they may just be getting paid to keep this thread going for hits. Flagpole is absolutely the most biased and deranged of them all. The other 2 are definitely smarter than him, but they still can't see the Forrest for the Trees (google it Flagpole).
Thanks for winning Trump, you've not only done great things while in Office, you've made the top 3 posters basically live on this site and waste their precious time. I went back and just looked at the 3 days before Christmas, Christmas Day, and the days that followed. Flagpole spent more time on here than with his alleged family. Wow, that says it all right there!
We can talk about Iran-Contra too in this thread if you want.
Or JFK's affairs, maybe.
I heard Lincoln was gay.
But for some reason we choose to focus on whether Trump worked with a foreign entity to influence our election.
Or why he would choose to not support climate efforts.
Or how he could possibly help the American healthcare system.
Or what his tax plan means for America in the long run and for the average person.
Isn't that really strange that we would want to focus on items of Trump's presidency in this thread?
Politifact has given their 2017 Lie of the Year award to...
Donald J. Trump
http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/28/opinions/trump-politifact-lie-of-year-obeidallah-opinion/index.html
Well deserved.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
You claim he is dishonest. Please prove he is dishonest. You are making stuff up.
Night observer wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Occasionally, a Trumper might argue that he is great, but I've yet to hear anyone say he's honest.
Even Trump's mother wouldn't claim that he's honest.
I have heard many trump supporters say they that trump tells it like it is and they believe trump over any media reports.
If pressed about a particular lie, they will divert and say he is not as dishonest as crooked hillary.I
So yes they believe him to be honest for a poltician.
We could talk about the current issues. Unfortunately, you don't want to talk about it. You want to bash Trump about everything he does. In your head you can't conceive that anything Trump does is for the good of the people of the US. Not only do you think his policies are bad and evil, but you think he is evil. What is there to talk about?
L L wrote:
We can talk about Iran-Contra too in this thread if you want.
Or JFK's affairs, maybe.
I heard Lincoln was gay.
But for some reason we choose to focus on whether Trump worked with a foreign entity to influence our election.
Or why he would choose to not support climate efforts.
Or how he could possibly help the American healthcare system.
Or what his tax plan means for America in the long run and for the average person.
Isn't that really strange that we would want to focus on items of Trump's presidency in this thread?
Politifact??? Wow, suddenly you choose to use a fake news link by them.
What's next chubby, Snopes??? Oh, you don't count them when they go against your Loser Gal.
All of your links suck. I never click on them but laugh out loud at your posts.
Flagpole is going.
Mueller is coming after HRC and Podesta.
Trump keeps winning!!!
LL, you are mental. None of those people ran against the current President a year ago. No one is going back that far and what you just did was compare apples to dirt. That was one of your stupidest posts yet. Try to use your noggin a tad better you old fart. HRC just ran against Trump. She lost. See outside help if you need it. Email me, please, I'll gladly help.
Yes, HRC ran and lost over a year ago. There was much talk about that at the time.
But she keeps getting brought up today as if she currently has any influence over anything.
She is not in the White House now. She won't be the candidate next time.
its_baddude wrote:
We could talk about the current issues. Unfortunately, you don't want to talk about it. You want to bash Trump about everything he does. In your head you can't conceive that anything Trump does is for the good of the people of the US. Not only do you think his policies are bad and evil, but you think he is evil. What is there to talk about?
I want to see you talk about current issues, so go ahead.
Currently, Trump said he signed the most legislature ever.
But he signed the fewest in his first year than anyone in over half a century.
Now you can argue that signing less legislature is good if you want.
But you can't argue that lying about it is good.
So give us the good news to combat my negativity.
You missed his point. She lied with reckless abandon and you voted for her. You now complain about who won, calling him a liar. Dear God, you really don't get it.
If that wasn't enough to get Hillary's back up, New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd's interview with [David] Geffen in the next morning's newspaper certainly was. Geffen, a big fundraiser for the Clintons in the past dismissed Hillary Clinton as "overproduced and overscripted." As for her husband, Geffen suggested that his bad-boy days are not behind him: "I don't think anybody believes that in the last six years, all of a sudden Bill Clinton has become a different person." And to top it off, he said this about the two of them: "Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it's troubling."
^^^^^^^. You voted for her? She lost. Now you've told a dozen posters, if not more, that it's old news. I too am super glad that Donald Trump won. It's gotta be killing you inside, doesn't it? Page 706, FP posted at least 6 times. You've all been told that you've got no life, and it's apparently true.
The NY Times White House reporters are so fvcking pathetic. When Trump tells you he knows the details of the tax legislation better than the world's greatest CPA, you ask a goddamn follow-up question like, "so what's the relationship between full expensing and the interest deduction limitation?" or "what do you think of the provisions they've built in to prevent inappropriate income shifting?" You don't just... move on. There are only two possible explanations for this kind of journalistic malpractice. Either Trump's idiocy is contagious, or the "liberal" media isn't really all that liberal.
Told a dozen posters? More like told one or two posters using different unregistered handles, haha.
Flagpole is owning everyone.
same style same lack of intelligence wrote:
Told a dozen posters? More like told one or two posters using different unregistered handles, haha.
Flagpole is owning everyone.
Hahaha!! Yeah, he's doing a fine job owning everyone by a) being a giant douche reciting Left wing talking points and polls for the months leading up to the election, b) ultimately being outrageously wrong about what was - at the time - a SLAM DUNK, and c) disappearing for a while to cope with the devastating and ultra-embarrassing loss, and d) now crossing his fingers and hoping reeeeeal hard for Trump to be taken down. HAHA!!
Further evidence that Liberals prefer to live in bubbles so they can create their own reality.
Shubacca wrote:
You missed his point. She lied with reckless abandon and you voted for her. You now complain about who won, calling him a liar. Dear God, you really don't get it.
Are you really playing the lying game by portraying Trump as the more honest person here?
Reckless abandon perfectly displays Trump's lying patterns.
Trump has plenty of lies with no consequences like when he lies about crowd size are legislation signed.
But many of his lies do have consequence.
When he lies about showing his taxes, Americans do not get to vet the president in the way that a loan officer would check a credit score.
Then doubles down on the lie saying he won't pass a tax plan that will help him. That has consequences as we are borrowing money form future tax payers to give him and his family a tax break.
We want to know if he is lying about colluding with Russians because it affects the integrity of our entire democracy.
When he says he is going to work for the forgotten working class person that is a lie because he has not produced anything that will help them.
And almost anytime you hear him say "believe me" it was proceeded by a lie.
So I keep seeing Trump supporters over and over again speaking of Hillary lies in generalities while we provide specifics of Trump lies.
It's like l the healthcare plan.
Democrats specifically devised a plan that gave healthcare to millions of more people.
Republicans generally said they would do something better but provided no specifics.
And guess what? They delivered nothing!
No he's posting actual facts that no one is refuting, instead they say he was wrong about the election. That's the reality you're missing. That's winning.
Excellent post.
These handful of DBs that are still crying are wasting their lives away. I'll not check LRC for a couple weeks and then pop back in, and sure enough these same losers are at it still- speculating and making hopeful doomsday predictions about POTUS45 being taken down.
But it's not going to happen.
No tick, tick.
No Mueller coming.
No POTUS45 done.
BUT...
Flagpole WILL BLOW HIS BRAINS OUT OVER POTUS45, DONALD J TRUMP!! And that's something we can all be excited about. Facebook Live it, BROTHER!!! PLEASE!!!
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Clayton Murphy is giving some great insight into his training.
NAU women have no excuse - they should win it all at 2024 NCAA XC
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion