Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Trump wrote:

You know, you guys aren't even good for a laugh anymore. Try to have at least some connection to reality.

0/10

Son, if there was any 'collusion', DJT would have never made it this far. You know, the wiretaps, etc... nothing... over a year later.

It is certainly comical to watch this 'investigation' quietly make its way out the 'collusion' door and into the 'anything, please' door.

You're all desperate, and have set yourselves up for what will be epic and unrecoverable humiliation.

0/10, child.

Please try harder or go home. It is not even interesting at this point.

Rigged for Trump wrote:

0/10, child.

Please try harder or go home. It is not even interesting at this point.

Hey libby, guess what! 3 MORE YEARS OF THE GREATEST PRESIDENT EVER!!!1

Hardloper wrote:

Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:

" A Treasury Department study on the impact of tax bills since 1940, first released in 2006 and later updated, found that the 1981 tax cut reduced revenues by $208 billion in its first four years. (These figures are rendered in constant 2012 dollars.)

Tax revenues were higher in 1985 than 1980-81. The results are in. No need for some mental acrobats 20 years later to f*** around with the numbers and dispute the obvious fact.

.

Just what I expected, a complete denial of reality. I quote you SEVERAL sources showing you that even REAGAN HIMSELF (and pretty much everyone who worked for him on those cuts) didn't think going in, or after the fact, that his or anyone else's tax cuts would/did raise more revenue (through direct effect on economic growth) than they lost. "Mental acrobatics" ?? WTF are you talking about?

More:

"Federal revenue share of GDP fell from 19.6% in fiscal 1981 to 17.3% in 1984"

CBO

Here, same basic #'s: Federal revenue share of GDP fell 19.1 - 16.9 , 1981-1984 (if you want 1985, wow, 17.2)

As you see in those tables, in real $'s, revenue fell from 81-84. And stayed lower than 81 as % of GDP during Reagan's whole 8 years. Sure, in 85 revenue totals in real $'s began to rise again, but of course you are ignoring that by that point there was, compared to '81:

* population growth

* two big TAX INCREASES that Reagan also signed

* yes, improved economy, only part of which could even be credited to the initial tax cuts.

No one even remotely clear-headed/unbiased thinks tax cuts raise more revenue due to direct economy boosting than they lose in direct revenue losses. Except fake news/fake "facts"/fake stats people like you.

Jame Alefantis server was hacked too, and... wrote:

Rigged for Trump wrote:

You know, you guys aren't even good for a laugh anymore. Try to have at least some connection to reality.

0/10

Son, if there was any 'collusion', DJT would have never made it this far. You know, the wiretaps, etc... nothing... over a year later.

It is certainly comical to watch this 'investigation' quietly make its way out the 'collusion' door and into the 'anything, please' door.

You're all desperate, and have set yourselves up for what will be epic and unrecoverable humiliation.

You wish.

Mueller was appointed in May, so he hasn't been investigating for "over a year". Why do you Trumpers think this should have uncovered everything so far? Flynn has only recently been aiding the investigation. The investigation into Nixon and Bill Clinton took longer. Understand that it is just your HOPE that they would have found everything by now.

Trump lies about EVERYTHING, so when he says there was "no collusion", what does that mean to you? Do you really trust him and believe what he says? Fact finders show he lies 5.5 times every day where Obama told 18 provable lies in 8 years. Pretty big difference there.

Collusion is not off the table. Obstruction of justice may be easier to prove, but collusion could still be the case. The questions remain...why would Trump and so many in his administration lie and obfuscate? Why attempts to obstruct justice?

People don't do that if they are innocent. It's not like they are lying about France. It is always Russia with so many connections to Russia that I couldn't even possibly type them all out.

It could take a year or longer still to find everything. Mueller wants to lock everything down...he won't rush through this.

Every day Trump's demise is closer.

Mueller is coming.

Trump is done.

Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:

More:

"Federal revenue share of GDP fell from 19.6% in fiscal 1981 to 17.3% in 1984"

CBO

Here, same basic #'s: Federal revenue share of GDP fell 19.1 - 16.9 , 1981-1984 (if you want 1985, wow, 17.2)

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/federal-receipt-and-outlay-summary

Of course tax revenue fell as a share of GDP, genius. That's the whole point - make the GDP bigger and run the government on the same resources. You see, 17.2% of 7.7 billion is bigger than 19.1% of 6.5 billion. And by the time they raised taxes in 1986 (to still a much lower level than they were in 1980), there was a lot more revenue producing wealth in the economy than their would have been.

You are still trying to argue this point??? Wait, of course you, you are impervious to facts or reason.

"by the time they raised taxes in 1986???"

Newsflash dishonest dimwit, Reagan signed tax INCREASES into law 3 times before that:

"in 1982 with the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act, again in 1983 with the Social Security Amendments, and in 1984 with the Deficit Reduction Act. Many of these tax increases aimed to increase federal tax revenue, after it declined following initial cuts."

Nice try.

Bottom line, even WITH these reversals of some of his initial tax cutting, even with population growth, even with recovery from recession, revenues FELL between 81-84. Period.

Once again, from Treasury report:

REVENUE EFFECTS OF MAJOR TAX BILLS SINCE 1940-

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/tax-analysis/Documents/WP81-Table2013.pdf

Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 resulted in 100's of billions of $'s in lost revenue in today's $'s.

Keep dreaming about voodoo economics.

(and to read more on how much voodoo/doodoo it really is, here-

https://www.salon.com/writer/christian-weller

)

Idiocy at its finest. Stop. Watching. Fox. News. It's making you dumber by the minute. FISA warrants were not issued because of the Steele dossier. Hillary, Hillary, Hillary! FFS, please spend more $ investigating her. If she's guilty, so be it. But Treasongate is not about Hillary or Obama.

Mueller is a Republican wth an impeccable record. He will be an American hero. He chose country over party.

It's too late for the idiots.

Jame Alefantis server was hacked too, and... wrote:

Son, if there was any 'collusion', DJT would have never made it this far. You know, the wiretaps, etc... nothing... over a year later.

You Briedbard bots are hilarious. At once you guys claim government is no good at anything while simultaneously insisting government is so good at their job, collusion would have been caught in realtime. Nixon went into a second term.

How do you know Trump would have never made it this far? Explain to me how that works. Do you have a blog? A myspace page with other deep thoughts?

Multiple felonies in only 12 months isn't nothing. Trump is so stupid, he could realistically stumble through life with so little comprehension of his actions and obviously easily influenced by anyone good with a compliment and sufficient pageantry. It will more likely be money laundering, or even intentionally enriching his businesses as President that ends up sticking.

nontrumper wrote:

Idiocy at its finest. Stop. Watching. Fox. News. It's making you dumber by the minute. FISA warrants were not issued because of the Steele dossier. Hillary, Hillary, Hillary! FFS, please spend more $ investigating her. If she's guilty, so be it. But Treasongate is not about Hillary or Obama.

Mueller is a Republican wth an impeccable record. He will be an American hero. He chose country over party.

It's too late for the idiots.

Just posted on Briedbbard: Trump is Hillary in a fat suit.

Taxes were still lower in 1983, 84, and even 86 than in 1980. The net change from 1980 to 1986 is still a tax cut, and more revenues.

They only measured 4 years and then stopped. A tax cut does not need to pay off in only 4 years. In fact, if there never were a tax cut since 1980, and tax rates remained 70% on income over 100K, it's fairly obvious that today's economy would be much smaller. You'll note none of the "economic stimulus" bills in 2008-09 which were supposed to pay for themselves paid off in 4 years either.

I'd rather read what Oprah Winfrey thinks than Salon.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

nontrumper wrote:

Idiocy at its finest. Stop. Watching. Fox. News. It's making you dumber by the minute. FISA warrants were not issued because of the Steele dossier. Hillary, Hillary, Hillary! FFS, please spend more $ investigating her. If she's guilty, so be it. But Treasongate is not about Hillary or Obama.

Mueller is a Republican wth an impeccable record. He will be an American hero. He chose country over party.

It's too late for the idiots.

Just posted on Briedbbard: Trump is Hillary in a fat suit.

Just posted on Letsrun. Democrats watch MSNBC and CNN and won't stop watching. Their brains get smaller after each viewing.

Yep, it's too late for the idiot Democrats indeed, indictments are coming. Yeah peabrain, HRC is innocent and I've got a new running shoe to sell you called the ********-******

Mueller is in with the Democrats. Are you really that dense? Do some real history about the guy and stop watching the fake news cr@pola.

Hardloper wrote:

In fact, if there never were a tax cut since 1980, and tax rates remained 70% on income over 100K, it's fairly obvious that today's economy would be much smaller.

When you say "it's fairly obvious", does that mean you can simply explain why that must be true or does it mean you accept it without any meaningful analysis?

Just posted on Letsrun. Democrats watch MSNBC and CNN and won't stop watching. Their brains get smaller after each viewing.

Yep, it's too late for the idiot Democrats indeed, indictments are coming. Yeah peabrain, HRC is innocent and I've got a new running shoe to sell you called the ********-******

Mueller is in with the Democrats. Are you really that dense? Do some real history about the guy and stop watching the fake news cr@pola.[/quote]

THIS^^^^^

trumper but nonobama and nonhrc wrote:

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Just posted on Briedbbard: Trump is Hillary in a fat suit.

Just posted on Letsrun. Democrats watch MSNBC and CNN and won't stop watching. Their brains get smaller after each viewing.

Yep, it's too late for the idiot Democrats indeed, indictments are coming. Yeah peabrain, HRC is innocent and I've got a new running shoe to sell you called the ********-******

Mueller is in with the Democrats. Are you really that dense? Do some real history about the guy and stop watching the fake news cr@pola.

I don't watch news. I read from many, many sources. It's obvious to anyone (GOP or Dem) that Trump is in trouble.

Mueller believes in the law, regardless of party. "In with the Democrats." HAHAHAHAHAHAH. Again, nothing but idiocy.

You've chosen party over country. F'in traitors!

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

You Briedbard bots are hilarious. At once you guys claim government is no good at anything while simultaneously insisting government is so good at their job, collusion would have been caught in realtime. Nixon went into a second term.

How do you know Trump would have never made it this far? Explain to me how that works. Do you have a blog? A myspace page with other deep thoughts?

Multiple felonies in only 12 months isn't nothing. Trump is so stupid, he could realistically stumble through life with so little comprehension of his actions and obviously easily influenced by anyone good with a compliment and sufficient pageantry. It will more likely be money laundering, or even intentionally enriching his businesses as President that ends up sticking.

This is a great post. I especially like the "sufficient pageantry" comment, because that is so true and part of his insanity.

Trump is so criminal and so stupid that it really boggles the mind of anyone with a brain.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

He's right, do your homework before spouting off lies in an attempt to sound intelligent.

Idiocy? Ha, ha, ha...you were saying?

Yep, you dumb Liberals spend more time avoiding the truth than anyone else.

Yeah, no conflict of interest there, eh? But if it were Donald Trump, then it would be different. Do you see how utterly biased you are? What a joke!

http://heavy.com/news/2017/10/robert-mueller-team-democrat-campaign-donation-hillary/

http://www.gopusa.com/robert-mueller-stocks-staff-with-democrat-donors/

Anyone with a brain? Well, that excludes you.

Trump will reign on, you will eat crow as your guarantees won't stand up to the facts.

Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? wrote:

Anyone with a brain? Well, that excludes you.

Trump will reign on, you will eat crow as your guarantees won't stand up to the facts.

Dude, you are really mistaken. Fox News and other Trump lickers only recently have brought up the possibility of Mueller being corrupt (which he isn't of course) because he has shown that he is after the truth and not out to protect his OWN political party which is the Republican Party. As Rosenstein so clearly stated, those in the justice department are tasked with being impartial, and it is their duty to be so even if they have political leanings. You can't find ANYONE in the FBI or justice department who doesn't have political opinions. Just because someone gives to Democrats doesn't mean they can't be impartial. FBI Director Christopher Wray has ONLY given money to Republican candidates to the tune of $39,000, and I believe HE has the ability to be impartial.

Newt Gingrich praised Mueller as a great choice initially, obviously now because Mueller is a Republican and Gingrich figured he would be soft on Trump. Now that it is clear Mueller means business, Gingrich calls Mueller corrupt. Such BS.

Facts are facts. So, Fox News and many of you here are suggesting that because there are some Democrats on the investigative team that they will make up incriminating information on Trump...wow, that is insane.

When you know you did something wrong and the noose is tightening, what you do is you attack the truth-telling media and the investigators. Even many of those who voted for Trump now see that he's hiding something...because he is.

What is coming for Trump:

Conspiracy

Money Laundering

Breaking of emoluments clause

Obstruction of justice

That Judge Pirro woman is out of her mind. She believes that not only should Mueller and his team be fired but that they should be taken out in handcuffs. On what grounds?! Wow. She supports a dictatorship...as does Sarah Sanders. When Sanders said that it is inappropriate to question a former 4 star general, then we know the White House doesn't understand the meaning of a free press and free speech. Ironic to the nth degree that those of you who support Trump also like to hold the flag up and yell "freedom!" at the top of your lungs. The pen is mightier than the sword, so an attack on the free press is much more of an attack on our freedoms than an attack on guns. If Trump had his way, he would become the supreme ruler here in the US, and your precious guns would soon go the way of the Dodo.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.