Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

WTF are you talking about? wrote:

What are you guys on?!

Marijuana, sometimes. (I know. The horror.) What are YOU on? Because the numbers you cited are NOT Obama's deficits. That is the debt increase, which is not the same thing:

Here are the real numbers, according to the same source you cited in a different article:

FY 2016 - $585 billion.

FY 2015 - $438 billion.

FY 2014 - $485 billion.

FY 2013 - $679 billion.

FY 2012 - $1.087 trillion.

FY 2011 - $1.300 trillion.

FY 2010 - $1.294 trillion.

FY 2009 - $1.413 trillion.

So yes. Deficits and deficits as a percentage of gdp were "generally reduced" over the course of Barack Obama's tenure. And it was largely irresponsible Republican fiscal policies that necessitated him exploding the deficit early on in the first place.

But the real point being made here isn't about what happens to the deficit/debt under Democrats. We're not the ones who've turned it into a fetish object. For the past several decades, Republicans have promoted fiscal responsibility and screamed about the terrible dangers of increasing the national debt during Democratic presidencies, and then, after gaining power, turned around and cut taxes without cutting spending, got us involved in costly wars, and pushed to deregulate the financial sector. And they're doing it all over again right now.

its_baddude wrote:

Pee Pee Gate was bought and paid by Hillary and company with Uranium money!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.f14991dd95df

Oh man. The chain of events that is going to result from the actual collusion being between HRC/DNC and "RUSSIA!" is going to be more EPIC of a Flagpole than the 2016 Flagpole itself.

This is going to be great. How are you guys going to have your crow, Lefties?

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

How are you guys going to have your crow, Lefties?

What are you talking about? This isn't news. Campaigns pay people conduct oppo research on each other. That's how it works. Steel was initially hired to do this research... by Republicans! Most of this "revelatory" information was published by the Guardian half a year ago. CNN/Mother Jones issued similar reports even earlier.

"Last year, a political intelligence firm in Washington, Fusion GPS, hired Steele to investigate Trump’s dealings with Russia. The DNC paid for the work after its initial funder, a wealthy Jeb Bush supporter, dropped out."

From the WaPo article today:

"Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS’s research into Trump was funded by an unknown Republican client during the GOP primary."

None of this discredits the substance of the document, which again, was seen as worthy of serious consideration by the upper echelons of our intelligence agencies.

Here is some fuel for your fire!

Because it is fake. Because it is a conflict of interest. Because it started a fake investigation. Because politicians are liars.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

L L wrote:

At this point it's not about whether the widow was thrilled with his call but the fact that Trump is basically attacking this widow right now and calling her a liar.

Really low class.

The clown had to get Kelly to back his lies.

I wonder what how Kelly felt about publicly lying for the President.

We know the other clowns are perfectly happy to lie. One more liar;

Yup. Once again proving agip's postulate: Anyone who associates with Donald Trump sooner or later will utterly destroy his/her own reputation.

Forty years to build a solid reputation. One moment to tear it all down. Sad.

Cankles is a sociopath. She funded a fake dossier, claimed that she didn’t, and then blamed it for her loss.

Rough day for the dems:

1. Jeff Flake gone soon

2. Devin Nunes looking into Uranium One

3. Clinton Campaign funding Fake Trump Dossier

Lock her up.

MAGA!!!

Boom!

http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-clinton-bribed-6-republicans/amp/

So Republicans demanded bribes from Clinton. Sounds like typical Republican strong arm coercion.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Boom!

http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-clinton-bribed-6-republicans/amp/

Fake news?

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Boom!

http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-clinton-bribed-6-republicans/amp/

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Rough day for the dems:

1. Jeff Flake gone soon

That's really funny.

Flake is a consistent conservative Republican.

He may be replaced by a Democrat, so that's not bad for the Dems.

But he is not gone soon.

He still has 14 months to serve and has no loyalty to bow to Trump for anything now.

He'll vote for most Republican bills, yes. But now he feels free to bad mouth Trump as much as he wants, the way Corker is doing. The way McCain is also doing.

Trump now has the majority of the Senate along with the majority of the country against him.

Republicans may be able to get extreme whackos voted in some rural districts but it's harder to get them voted in statewide elections.

Jeff Flake does not support Trump's agenda. Trump has never had a "majority of the senate." What he is trying to do is actually get a majority to implement his agenda. 1) He still has 14 months to serve and has no loyalty to bow to Trump for anything now. He never had. 2) He needs to do that to get a job in the future He'll vote for most Republican bills, yes. 3) But now he feels free to bad mouth Trump as much as he wants, the way Corker is doing. The way McCain is also doing. That is what he has been doing all along. Clear?

L L wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Rough day for the dems:

1. Jeff Flake gone soon

That's really funny.

Flake is a consistent conservative Republican.

He may be replaced by a Democrat, so that's not bad for the Dems.

But he is not gone soon.

He still has 14 months to serve and has no loyalty to bow to Trump for anything now.

He'll vote for most Republican bills, yes. But now he feels free to bad mouth Trump as much as he wants, the way Corker is doing. The way McCain is also doing.

Trump now has the majority of the Senate along with the majority of the country against him.

Republicans may be able to get extreme whackos voted in some rural districts but it's harder to get them voted in statewide elections.

Explain how the recent activities could be good for Republicans or Trump.

The only thing that they really want to do is to say the reformed taxes and will settle surely for tax cuts, which is not the same thing as reform.

Reform won't happen. Too many lobbyists fighting for each deduction to stay.

They can lower taxes but they are already low for most people. They can only lower taxes for high earners and for corporations. And they will have to accept higher deficits as a result, not very conservative.

They may just blow up the deficit or take services away just to get a victory they are starved for.

We'll see.

L L wrote:

Explain how the recent activities could be good for Republicans or Trump.

The only thing that they really want to do is to say the reformed taxes and will settle surely for tax cuts, which is not the same thing as reform.

Reform won't happen. Too many lobbyists fighting for each deduction to stay.

They can lower taxes but they are already low for most people. They can only lower taxes for high earners and for corporations. And they will have to accept higher deficits as a result, not very conservative.

They may just blow up the deficit or take services away just to get a victory they are starved for.

We'll see.

the positive side for the repubs is that they are coalescing around Trump as the leader of the republican party. The Repubs who want to govern, who want to compromise with Dems to come up with good policy...are quitting. In their stead...people like Alabama's Moore, who just wants to scream and shout and posture.

This is awful for the nation.

^This bruhs. As I have said several times we will see s tidal wave of change in congress in 2018. But, it will not be a backlash against Trump or be anything good for the intelligent, non-mouthbreathing folks of this country (i.e. The Dems / libs). What is going to happen is the GOP will retain and likely grow their majority in both houses of congress BUT it'll be growth through replacement of incumbent republicans and democrats with "Trump republicans". For those of you that are not aware "Trump republicans" are vile stupid people who would like to turn the US into a Christian Theocracy dominated by white people. This is somewhat ironic in that Trump himself is no Christian, bruhs.

God help us all.

Kek

https://i.redd.it/ox4zcsv06wtz.jpg

Can't Stump the Trump wrote:

Kek

https://i.redd.it/ox4zcsv06wtz.jpg

LOL- CNN busted in another major lie / coverup for their lady. So F'n pathetic. Constantly trying to " undermine democracy."

EricTrump2024 wrote:

Can't Stump the Trump wrote:

Kek

https://i.redd.it/ox4zcsv06wtz.jpg

LOL- CNN busted in another major lie / coverup for their lady. So F'n pathetic. Constantly trying to " undermine democracy."

How many morans here have posted for months about Trump's collusion with Russia? So many clueless sheep on the Left.