Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Sally Vix wrote:

Speed over 60 wrote:

Bad, don't worry, when the time is right, our new AG will indict Trump for his 10 counts of Obstruction of Justice and Perjury during the Mueller investigation ! Can't wait ?

Dude - Trump never testified under oath. Please explain how he committed perjury. Looks like my constitutional analysis of no presidential impeachment trial of a president WHO IS NO LONGER PRESIDENT!!! was spot on.

No, you are just a trump lover

Bad Wigins wrote:

Oh and regarding that "senate trial," if he's not president, why are you still trying to remove him from office? Obviously you still believe he's president.

If you think he's guilty of a crime, go to the courts. No, this is a political statement, but you're too dumb to realize what you're saying.

It is going to trial and many legal scholars say it's legitimate so I guess all those congressman and legal experts are too dumb to realize what they are saying.

There nothing political about Democrats wanting a Senate conviction of Trump. It is political to most Republicans, but Trump provoked an attack on the U.S. Capitol and he needs to be held accountable. I'm fine with either a Senate trial or criminal charges. Do you grasp the magnitude of an attack on the Capitol? Some people seem treat it as just being another daily screw-up by Trump.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Bad Wigins wrote:

Oh and regarding that "senate trial," if he's not president, why are you still trying to remove him from office? Obviously you still believe he's president.

If you think he's guilty of a crime, go to the courts. No, this is a political statement, but you're too dumb to realize what you're saying.

It is going to trial and many legal scholars say it's legitimate so I guess all those congressman and legal experts are too dumb to realize what they are saying.

You are responding to windbags mate.

I am on opposite end of earth and I understand fully that the impeachment dates to when he was in office. That's when it was voted on. It doesn't matter that he is out of office now, it has precedent and is more than symbolic, because it will officially mark his presidency as an impeached president and also they can move on removing his title and bar him from future office.

These are important things considering his incitement to violence of capitol and coup.

In fact he should be tried for treason

Bad Wigins wrote:

Oh and regarding that "senate trial," if he's not president, why are you still trying to remove him from office? Obviously you still believe he's president.

If you think he's guilty of a crime, go to the courts. No, this is a political statement, but you're too dumb to realize what you're saying.

Who are you? How stupid are you? You apparently don't know that a conviction can include "disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States." Besides that, a conviction would be a forever stain on Trump, you nimrod.

What are you idiots so mad about? Every time I point out your obsession with Trump, you act like it's somehow my fault.

It's just like the rallies - more of you peeps went to Trump's rallies than your own candidate's. You don't even want to talk about Biden. The entire narrative of your political lives is still centered on one man. You lack any identity of your own.

The last two or three days of your obsession with this thread has been focused on me.

The GOP is a cesspool

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/27/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-david-hogg-video/index.html

Trollminator wrote:

The GOP is a cesspool

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/27/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-david-hogg-video/index.html

John Kerry’s family still owns private jet as he leads climate fight, FAA records indicate.

What a fraud.

Trollminator wrote:

The GOP is a cesspool

Some are now referring it "IT" as the QOP, to signify the parties transition from Grand to Q-anon.

This comes after House Rs Leader, Kevin McCarty, decided to zoom over to Florida for a meeting with Trump. (What might they be planning?)

Sally Vix wrote:

John Kerry’s family still owns private jet as he leads climate fight, FAA records indicate.

What a fraud.

Kerry's Gulfstream (5 passenger) charter plane DOES NOT emit 40x more carbon that Trump's private (200 passenger) 757 Whale jet . That is because Trump doesn't allow more than a few people on his personal plane. What is true is that Trump emits 40x more carbon per flight than Kerry does per flight.

Kerry's "private" plane is a no-so-privately owned charter plane. A Gulfstream that he and others use. The charter company is owned by his wife. The plane is claimed as privately owned by Faux news because his wife owns a company that rents those planes out.

In conclusion, you are the stupidest poster on this thread.

the letter 5 wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

John Kerry’s family still owns private jet as he leads climate fight, FAA records indicate.

What a fraud.

Kerry's Gulfstream (5 passenger) charter plane DOES NOT emit 40x more carbon that Trump's private (200 passenger) 757 Whale jet . That is because Trump doesn't allow more than a few people on his personal plane. What is true is that Trump emits 40x more carbon per flight than Kerry does per flight.

Kerry's "private" plane is a no-so-privately owned charter plane. A Gulfstream that he and others use. The charter company is owned by his wife. The plane is claimed as privately owned by Faux news because his wife owns a company that rents those planes out.

In conclusion, you are the stupidest poster on this thread.

Fox News host Pete Hegseth echoed the New York Post's criticism of Kerry, characterized by the paper as a "lifelong joke" and "one of the biggest gasbags in American politics, [who is] singlehandedly responsible for massive amounts of terrible emissions" with his use of private jets and luxury yachts.

"It’s a common thing," Hegseth said. "They want the rules not to apply to them, but of course, the rest of us need to destroy our economy in order to save the weather."

Here is a multiple choice math problem. Can you handle it?

Math Problem:

Bus A and Bus B are identical. Both seat 40 people.

Bus A has only one person riding it. No one else is allowed on board.

Bus B has 40 people riding it. Anyone can charter it.

Answer Choices.

1. Bus A and Bus B emit the same amount of carbon per person riding them.

2. Bus A is a carbon emitting pig spewing out 40x more carbon per person than Bus B.

Hint: Trump owns Bus A.

Sally Vix wrote:

"It’s a common thing," Hegseth said. "They want the rules not to apply to them, but of course, the rest of us need to destroy our economy in order to save the weather."

Which rule is he talking about? It's currently legal to own and operate an airplane.

The Letter 5 wrote:

Here is a multiple choice math problem. Can you handle it?

Math Problem:

Bus A and Bus B are identical. Both seat 40 people.

Bus A has only one person riding it. No one else is allowed on board.

Bus B has 40 people riding it. Anyone can charter it.

Answer Choices.

1. Bus A and Bus B emit the same amount of carbon per person riding them.

2. Bus A is a carbon emitting pig spewing out 40x more carbon per person than Bus B.

Hint: Trump owns Bus A.

Not "everyone" can charter Bus B. Where is Bus C? Bus C can have 400 people riding it. Plus Bus B often has a very wealthy Climate Envoy on it with very few others riding it. That rider on Bus B could ride on Bus C since that Bus B rider preaches about Global Warming and how CO2 emissions destroying the Earth. Riding on Bus C much more efficient.

The Letter 5 wrote:

Here is a multiple choice math problem. Can you handle it?

Math Problem:

Bus A and Bus B are identical. Both seat 40 people.

Bus A has only one person riding it. No one else is allowed on board.

Bus B has 40 people riding it. Anyone can charter it.

Answer Choices.

1. Bus A and Bus B emit the same amount of carbon per person riding them.

2. Bus A is a carbon emitting pig spewing out 40x more carbon per person than Bus B.

Hint: Trump owns Bus A.

The answer is that both buses should be electric so that neither emits greenhouse gasses.

Fixing the climate crisis is not about consumer choice or consumerism. It's good to make earth-friendly decisions like going vegan or riding public transit. But it is completely pointless to shame people for their individual choices.

Systemic change on a massive scale is the only solution. So just electrify the buses and run them on renewable energy. Apply the same systemic thinking to other emissions. Problem solved.

Sally Vix wrote:

The Letter 5 wrote:

Anyone can charter it.

Not "everyone" can charter Bus B.

Anyone and everyone are words with different meanings.

PS. Can "everyone" afford a plane ticket? Can "everyone" afford a car? Can "everyone" afford a home of their own?

The problem posed is fuel independent. Electric could be grid-connected recharging, or a standalone solar array.

Trump flies a his use only 757 Whale. (No one else can take a dump in his flying golden toilet. Icky germs! And that bigly smell.) Kerry flies a much smaller Gulfstream that other people can charter.

The Letter 5. wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

The answer is that both buses should be electric so that neither emits greenhouse gasses.

Fixing the climate crisis is not about consumer choice or consumerism. It's good to make earth-friendly decisions like going vegan or riding public transit. But it is completely pointless to shame people for their individual choices.

Systemic change on a massive scale is the only solution. So just electrify the buses and run them on renewable energy. Apply the same systemic thinking to other emissions. Problem solved.

The problem posed is fuel independent. Electric could be grid-connected recharging, or a standalone solar array.

Trump flies a his use only 757 Whale. (No one else can take a dump in his flying golden toilet. Icky germs! And that bigly smell.) Kerry flies a much smaller Gulfstream that other people can charter.

The problem posed is pointless.

It doesn't matter which person has a lower carbon footprint because the difference to the climate is basically zero.

It does matter if the whole transportation system is carbon neutral.

Fat hurts wrote:

The Letter 5 wrote:

Here is a multiple choice math problem. Can you handle it?

Math Problem:

Bus A and Bus B are identical. Both seat 40 people.

Bus A has only one person riding it. No one else is allowed on board.

Bus B has 40 people riding it. Anyone can charter it.

Answer Choices.

1. Bus A and Bus B emit the same amount of carbon per person riding them.

2. Bus A is a carbon emitting pig spewing out 40x more carbon per person than Bus B.

Hint: Trump owns Bus A.

The answer is that both buses should be electric so that neither emits greenhouse gasses.

Instead greenhouse gases are emitted by the generation and transmission infrastructure of the electricity. Stupid.

The first correct answer is that a bus with 1 passenger is much lighter than one with 40 and uses less fuel.

The second correct answer is that the same arbitrary comparison can reveal anyone a greenhouse-gas emitting pig. You drive your chevy volt or whatever 20 miles a day? Look there's someone else who drives a chevy volt 20 times a month.

The number of individuals who own buses for their pesonal travel is far too few to have significant objective impact on carbon emissions.

Fat hurts wrote:

The problem posed is pointless.

It doesn't matter which person has a lower carbon footprint because the difference to the climate is basically zero.

It does matter if the whole transportation system is carbon neutral.

The pointless one is you, Fat.

I have done energy use analysis for major utilities. The analysis provides carbon emissions calculations based on the carbon emissions from the grid power plants. So, if you charge you electric car at home, and do not have solar panels, your carbon emissions is equal to what you draw from the grid. If you have solar panels on your home and they are sufficient to met the demands of recharging your vehicle, then you can claim the car is not carbon emitting, but that is not really truthful unless other electrical loads are also offset. What that means is, if you still draw 20% of your energy from the grid you can only truthfully claim that 80% of the recharging of an electric car is carbon neutral. It is improper to claim the electric car is 100% offset and the rest of the home is only partly offset. That is doing carbon emissions the Faux way, ... total BS.