Trump’s rally in Lynden cost taxpayers $155,000 and counting
http://www.bellinghamherald.com/news/local/article80211802.html
Trump’s rally in Lynden cost taxpayers $155,000 and counting
http://www.bellinghamherald.com/news/local/article80211802.html
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trump pledged $1M to the Harvey Recovery.
$1M from the Trump Foundation. A foundation to which Trump himself hasn't donated any money to since 2008.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:Trump pledged $1M to the Harvey Recovery.
$1M from the Trump Foundation. A foundation to which Trump himself hasn't donated any money to since 2008.
How much have the Clinton's pledged to Harvet relief?
Is this true or made up. Where did you get this information? I brought up the leaked taxes (example) because leftist make sh*t up.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:Trump pledged $1M to the Harvey Recovery.
$1M from the Trump Foundation. A foundation to which Trump himself hasn't donated any money to since 2008.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:Trump pledged $1M to the Harvey Recovery.
$1M from the Trump Foundation. A foundation to which Trump himself hasn't donated any money to since 2008.
If I'm not mistaken, the same one "donating" a portrait of himself to a hotel with his name on it.
All 100% sketchy.
Looks likehe Dear Leader was lying about having no relations with Russia during his campaign. Surprising no one.
Good thing Obama bugged his NYC condo. Oh, wait, that didn't happen either.
As someone else has been posting, tick tock, tick tock, Donald.
How's that swamp draining going? Carrier still hiring in Indiana??
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:Trump pledged $1M to the Harvey Recovery.
$1M from the Trump Foundation. A foundation to which Trump himself hasn't donated any money to since 2008.
If I'm not mistaken, the same one "donating" a portrait of himself to a hotel with his name on it.
All 100% sketchy.
Looks likehe Dear Leader was lying about having no relations with Russia during his campaign. Surprising no one.
Good thing Obama bugged his NYC condo. Oh, wait, that didn't happen either.
As someone else has been posting, tick tock, tick tock, Donald.
How's that swamp draining going? Carrier still hiring in Indiana??
Awesome, love to see this! #MAGA
Even better...
Obama wants to enjoy global warming on his back yard. Is he a nonbeliever, LOL?
oops! damn those regulations!
on the other hand, this is the "free market" a work, sorta.
duderr wrote:
Even better...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7yV5EauXo0
You're impressed by photo ops?
Seriously?
Look, there is nothing wrong with photo ops like this. All Presidents and other politicians do it. But it is 100% staged PR. And you think it is significant?
Seriously?
Hi DFF, I had a busy weekend so I couldn't get back to you sooner. Just for clarification I said worshipping the NRA was one characteristic of neo-nazis, I didn't say all those who worship the nra are neo-nazis.You didn't answer my question about your feelings about trump saying some really nice people marched with the neo-nazis or his belief confederate monuments should stay. So you are OK with that???Many here think you are 100% troll. Some even think you and the mods might have a good laugh about your recurring DFF character.I think you are only part troll. You are troll in that you want to shock and hurt but you basically believe what you post. You have adopted many neo-nazi type behaviors and interests. The repetitive nature of your posts, sustained for such a long time and how you often get rattled and double post suggests this is not a complete troll.You have said hateful things for a number of months, so some blow back should be expected. I do think you have some tie to this message board and thats why your posts have stayed. You have to admit, much of the stuff you post is pretty trashy.Together we are going to find out a little bit more about DFF. I find you to be an interesting puzzle.
Can't Stump the Trump wrote:
Flagpole wrote:Trump certainly hasn't done anything to move the needle in a positive direction.
Why did the DOW and economic optimism surge when Mr. Trump was elected? Coincidence?
The market doesn't like uncertainty, so it typically has a bounce the first 100 days whenever a new president begins. Trump is in 7th place after the first 100 days as far as the Dow goes. Those that did better than he did include 3 Democrats and 3 Republicans. NOTE: HOW THE STOCK MARKET DOES HAS NEXT TO NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PRESIDENT.
But since you brought it up...Better than Trump with regard to the Dow in the first 100 days:
FDR (D) - 75%
Taft (R) - 13%
McKinley (R) - 12.47%
OBAMA (D) - 8.72%
GHWB (R) - 8.03%
JFK (D) - 7.32%
Trump (ahole) - 6.12%
sasha wrote:
oops! damn those regulations!
on the other hand, this is the "free market" a work, sorta.
It worked perfectly. Privatize the profits, socialize the costs/poisons.
Fat hurts wrote:
I think DFF's posts are computer-generated and many on this thread have failed the Turing Test.
What an interesting thought. Although technically, wouldn't it be more accurate to say the computer passed the Turing test?
I honestly have to give that idea some thought. In many respects it would make sense, the repetitive nature, the frequency of the posts, the seemingly inside perks from the board allowing the posts to continue.
Now you put me in a true Conundrum. IDK.
Its still interesting.
DFF,
Are you computer generated? I won't judge you negatively even if you are not human.
(PS I may not be human either)
C
its_baddude wrote:
Is this true or made up. Where did you get this information? I brought up the leaked taxes (example) because leftist make sh*t up.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/trump-and-the-truth-his-charitable-givingBack in April, Fahrenthold and Rosalind S. Helderman reported that they couldn’t find a single cash donation to charity that Trump personally had made over the previous five years.
...
But the Post also pointed out that Trump hadn’t given any of his own money to the Trump Foundation since 2008—almost all of its funding came from other people, including some of his business associates.
Conundrum wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:I think DFF's posts are computer-generated and many on this thread have failed the Turing Test.
What an interesting thought. Although technically, wouldn't it be more accurate to say the computer passed the Turing test?
Yes, that would be more accurate, but you get my meaning.
I think the posts are done by a human. But it's quite possible that the response text and icons are computer-generated with perhaps a bit of occasional human editing.
Fat hurts wrote:
Conundrum wrote:What an interesting thought. Although technically, wouldn't it be more accurate to say the computer passed the Turing test?
Yes, that would be more accurate, but you get my meaning.
I think the posts are done by a human. But it's quite possible that the response text and icons are computer-generated with perhaps a bit of occasional human editing.
DFF = moderator clickbate