Dey jus' keep graspin' wrote:
eric a blair wrote:I'll assume you were against the Benghazi investigations too, since you had no proof of misbehavior by HRC.
correct?
Stay focused here. I answered your question in two different ways. Can you answer my question in just one?
What are YOU accusing the Trump administration of doing, and what evidence do you have?
You must provide detail too ("colluding with Russia" is part of a headline, not a prosecutor's case). Otherwise it's just more hopeful partisan speculation.
Again, this is the exact question right-leaning news sources ask left-leaning politicians daily, and to this point have yet to receive an answer other than "we need to investigate."
the point is that we have a system in the USA. It's called law enforcement. When a law enforcement agency comes to the conclusion that something improper may have taken place, investigations are done to get to the bottom of it.
that's where we are. Law enforcement, which is called the FBI in this case, has publicly said that based on evidence they have, Russia interfered in the election, and furthermore, that Russia interfered with the goal of getting trump elected.
that's enough for me. I don't have to see classified, secret information. If the FBI believes improper activities have taken place then it should be investigated.
You, on the other hand, think the FBI is a bunch of Democratic hacks just trying to hurt Trump. Go to it man. It's a free country. But don't pretend you are playing within the 40 yard lines.