Dey jus' keep graspin' wrote:
This video exemplifies the Democrat obsession with Russia since the fall. The congressman will not- simply CANNOT- even provide one example of how the Russians influenced the election. How even the most partisan puppet could watch this and not be embarrassed for him is amazing. All he has to do is say ONE DAMN THING, and he cannot do it. Instead, it's all "let's have an investigation".....meaning let's all continue to speculate without any mention of what we're accusing the Trump campaign of doing. It's almost as stupid as "we have to pass the law to find out what's in it" from Pelosi. Ha. The Dems are clearly OBLITERATED.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/03/05/tucker_carlson_vs_dem_rep_name_one_way_russians_interfered_in_us_presidential_election.html
There are a number of things that happened during the election that were known even at the time that we are looking at here.
The Russians hacked and released Democrats emails to make them look bad, which would benefit Trump.
The Russians coordinated completely fake news stories through social media that made Hillary look bad - like the one where she had sex slaves in a basement of a restaurant.
And the FBI found numerous instances of Russian interference with US news and communications.
Add to that Trump's consistent positive comments about Russia and Putin.
Add to that Trump's security adviser, Michael Flynn resigned because he lied about contacts with Russia in December during the transition.
Now add to that Jeff sessions lying under oath, unprompted, that he had no contact with Russians during the campaign, when in fact he did.
He wasn't even asked about his contact with Russians. He was simply asked what he would do if he found that others had contact with the Russians. And his response was that he didn't speak with any Russians during the campaign.
Now maybe he was speaking in that he didn't speak about the campaign with Russians, but a good lawyer would know how to give the proper legal answer. How is he the top legal guy in the nation and doesn't know how to communicate under oath?
So what we were are saying here is that there are enough dots out there that we would like to investigate more to connect these dots.
What is the full picture here?
Benghazi was a single event that was investigated to death with no nefarious conclusion.
This is a set of continuous and maybe ongoing events that deserves some clarity.
And now we have the president literally tweeting fake news about wire taps.
At least cite Breitbart as a source.