Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Yes, I'm talking about firing Mueller. By Watergate's precedent, that should be something that triggers impeachment.

Wrong. Nixon was never impeached, but Slick Willy was.

the point is that Nixon lost support of the Republicans only when he started firing those investigating him. The repbs didn't care about his obstruction, lies, cover ups et al...but enough was enough. GOP senators knocked on Nixon's door and said enough was enough.

Fats is saying that Trump already fired the FBI director for invesstigating him...if Trump fires the special counsel (or deputy AG) then by the Watergate precedent, even GOP MCs and senators might knock on his door and tell him it's time to go.

Correct. I'm wondering how many of you think the same thing would happen again. According to the latest reporting, Trump seems to be considering a firing of Mueller.

Here is how wikipedia describes the aftermath when Nixon did the same thing:

We aren't interested in your videos either...all that you've posted on a daily basis. Trust me, you're not that important.

Fat hurts wrote:

My interest is in proven cases of in-person voter fraud by illegal immigrants.

Give me names and specific cases. I'm not interested in videos.

itsbaddude wrote:

I know you are interested in this. 1100 cases of proven voter fraud. You wanted at least one, here is more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHVK_ftiwhc&feature=youtu.be&t=1h59m13s

so in a perverse way, should anti-trumpers hope trump does fire mueller or rosenstein? In the same way that in a perverse way dems might want trumpcare to pass, so all those millions of trumpers left without health insurance would switch to voting for dems?

When was the last time I posted a video? I think you have me confused with someone else.

Biased much wrote:

We aren't interested in your videos either...all that you've posted on a daily basis. Trust me, you're not that important.

Fat hurts wrote:

My interest is in proven cases of in-person voter fraud by illegal immigrants.

Give me names and specific cases. I'm not interested in videos.

Biased much wrote:

We aren't interested in your videos either...all that you've posted on a daily basis. Trust me, you're not that important.

Oh, but I am. I am very, very special.

Each day I like to wake up in the morning and take a good long look in the mirror and just think; "Gosh darn it, you are one important dude" . . . (also rather handsome in sort of a rugged, manly way)

Fat hurts wrote:

When was the last time I posted a video? I think you have me confused with someone else.

Biased much wrote:

We aren't interested in your videos either...all that you've posted on a daily basis. Trust me, you're not that important.

Dude, get a clue. There is one guy who posts 90% of the pro-Trump material here. He changes his handle with every single post, rarely has a post with more than two sentences in it and NEVER has a post with any content. His only goal is to trigger you (and LL and Conundrum and eric/agip and pop . . .

And you respond to him? WTF?

Oh, so Wayne Barrett writes something and it's gospel, but when Geffen says it, it's false, right?Democrats love to point the finger. Too bad Clinton couldn't pull it off, we'd be in such better shape (insert major sarcasm).-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------And then, referring to the Peltier case, Geffen continued, ''Yet another time when the Clintons were unwilling to stand for the things that they genuinely believe in."Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it's troubling," Geffen said.The column, which ran a day after Geffen hosted a California fundraiser for Obama that fetched $1.3 million and drew celebrities including Jennifer Aniston and Morgan Freeman, set off a day of bitter back-and-forth between the Obama and Clinton camps.Clinton lashed out first, blasting Obama for being hypocritical. "He decries the politics of 'slash and burn,' and yet his chief supporters in California are engaged in the politics of slash and burn," said Howard Wolfson, Clinton's spokesman.Obama returned serve, saying, "The Clintons had no problem with David Geffen when he was raising them $18 million and sleeping at their invitation in the Lincoln Bedroom."The Clinton campaign also erroneously referred to Geffen as Obama's "finance chair" when he actually has no official role with the campaign.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Come up and stop licking Hillary's pu$$y for minute tell us how we'd be better off you simpleton? No brain Dems, they are a dime a dozen.

Thucydides wrote:

Arse in da house wrote:

the Clintons are vile pieces of garbage, always has been. go back as many years as you'd like, you'll find out the same thing knucklehead. wake up dumbo.

Take Trump's c*ck out of your mouth and tell us what role the Clintons play in the present day government?

I never liked them, btw-- not when they Donald were friends either but that isn't the issue in Washington today, is it?

eric a blair wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Correct. I'm wondering how many of you think the same thing would happen again. According to the latest reporting, Trump seems to be considering a firing of Mueller.

Here is how wikipedia describes the aftermath when Nixon did the same thing:

so in a perverse way, should anti-trumpers hope trump does fire mueller or rosenstein? In the same way that in a perverse way dems might want trumpcare to pass, so all those millions of trumpers left without health insurance would switch to voting for dems?

Some might think that would be a good result. It might get him out of office quickly.

But I think a better result for our nation would be that the Mueller investigation is completed and all the facts come out.

This is funny to me, really funny. You're the first person to post using the handle Not 100% Clueless on this thread, so what are your other handles? Is this your first time posting? Ironically, I've now read the last few dozen pages since yesterday as I don't have your kind of free time. I work, run, and have a family, apparently most of you guys don't. I've never posted, till right now today as I can't hold back anymore, you guys are way out there! Let it go. Donald Trump won. Hillary lost. He's not getting impeached and if you believe that, you're really out there. Both sides lie. Billary Clinton (Billary was intentional), Trump, Bush, Obama. None of you have no say in anything unless you are in the White House as you are reading this. Go running for God's sake, please!

Not 100% Clueless wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

When was the last time I posted a video? I think you have me confused with someone else.

Dude, get a clue. There is one guy who posts 90% of the pro-Trump material here. He changes his handle with every single post, rarely has a post with more than two sentences in it and NEVER has a post with any content. His only goal is to trigger you (and LL and Conundrum and eric/agip and pop . . .

And you respond to him? WTF?

for the record, I did 60 miles last week, I have my own business and am happily married.

We'd be better off under status quo Clinton, 100%. You seem to think people were under the illusion that she was a good person, when most didn't particularly like her. A majority of the voting base saw right through right through Trump's bull$hit, whether they liked Hillary or not they knew what they were getting with her. The piece of garbage Trump has never served and never held a government post, he could care less about policy and diplomacy. 6 months in and how much has he accomplished? Fine, he's an outsider and ran Republican, but you can still judge him on his promises. He's got nothing, except yet another long weekend on the golf course.And the only thing you have, besides Trump's c0ck lodged down your throat, is your endless obsession with an election loser.

Uccclid wrote:

Come up and stop licking Hillary's pu$$y for minute tell us how we'd be better off you simpleton? No brain Dems, they are a dime a dozen.

Thucydides wrote:

Take Trump's c*ck out of your mouth and tell us what role the Clintons play in the present day government?

I never liked them, btw-- not when they Donald were friends either but that isn't the issue in Washington today, is it?

Why did Hillary serve so long in the Fed Gov, when she could have made so much more money on the outside.? I only ask this because so many people seem to believe it she was taking/stealing money from various places/Gov'ts. Surely she could have sat on some boards and made millions without constantly travelling the world as SoS?

Hillary and Bill Clinton are pedophilic demonic beasts alive only by protections at the highest and most corrupted levels. They'd be dead if it weren't for satanic rituals. They're using children's blood through parabiosis to stay alive. They're disgusting. Sociopaths. Hillary lies like a robot. She's lost almost all her humanity. Just look in her eyes. That's not a human.

XY wrote:

Why did Hillary serve so long in the Fed Gov, when she could have made so much more money on the outside.?

erhhh probly because she couldn't, because she would fail instantly in the private sector??

Triggered much?

ehhmm wrote:

XY wrote:

Why did Hillary serve so long in the Fed Gov, when she could have made so much more money on the outside.?

erhhh probly because she couldn't, because she would fail instantly in the private sector??

you explained by Trump want to be president. he was failing, BIGLY, to make enough money in the private sector. so, he colludes with the russian mob to be sweet, beautiful loans. now as presivfefe he is making money hand over fist – a lot more money that he was making before; campaign contributions for personal use; all expenses paid, even personal; and doubling down by writing off those expenses even after they were paid for by taxpayers.

ehhmm wrote:

XY wrote:

Why did Hillary serve so long in the Fed Gov, when she could have made so much more money on the outside.?

erhhh probly because she couldn't, because she would fail instantly in the private sector??

for the record, while Bill was making very little in Arkansas government, HRC was paying the bills with her high end private sector legal career.