jesseriley wrote:
Trump is doing just what we said he’d do if acquitted. All a few pubs needed to do was vote yes, we did all the work for them.
“We can’t vote yes, we might get in trouble!”
Trump was acquitted.
Here is acquittal defined ...
a judgment that a person is not guilty of the crime with which the person has been charged
Can we finally let Trump preside over the country without crapp trying to encumber him? The dude was acquitted - EXONERATED - let the dude run the country!
As always, you miss the point. These Profiles In Cowardice are going to have to run for re-election.
“Vote Fraidy Cat for Congress 2020!”
A real winner...
Sally Vix wrote:
Trump was acquitted.
Here is acquittal defined .......
Moran....
The Senate voted as follows:
Article I – abuse of power: 48 guilty / 52 not guilty
Article II – obstruction of Congress: 48 guilty / 52 not guilty
Not guilt ≠ aquitted
Aquitted = To find "not guilty"
The above is why jury decisions are required to be unanimous in criminal cases. What you actually have is hung jury.
Hung Jury = A jury that cannot agree upon a verdict after extended deliberation and is unable to reach the required unanimity or supermajority.
The legal and formal certification of the innocence of a person who has been charged with a crime. Acquittals in fact take place when a jury finds a verdict of not guilty. Acquittals in law take place by operation of law such as when a person has been charged as an Accessory to the crime of Robbery and the principal has been acquitted.
Sally Vix wrote:
...
^ Ignorant Troll.
Relevance wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
...
^ Ignorant Troll.
Got old about 2 years ago. Give it a rest.
Sally Vix wrote:
...
^ Incredibly Ignorant Troll.[/quote]
Sally Vix wrote:
The legal and formal certification of the innocence of a person who has been charged with a crime. Acquittals in fact take place when a jury finds a verdict of not guilty. Acquittals in law take place by operation of law such as when a person has been charged as an Accessory to the crime of Robbery and the principal has been acquitted.
Shut up, you ignorant a$$. Acquittal was a given because of the extremely biased jury in this case. He did the things he was accused of, and you, even as dumb as you are, know that. O.J. Simpson was found not guilty. I guess you believe that one? Actually don't answer. I couldn't care less what someone as stupid as you thinks about anything.
Smorbun wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
The legal and formal certification of the innocence of a person who has been charged with a crime. Acquittals in fact take place when a jury finds a verdict of not guilty. Acquittals in law take place by operation of law such as when a person has been charged as an Accessory to the crime of Robbery and the principal has been acquitted.
Shut up, you ignorant a$$. Acquittal was a given because of the extremely biased jury in this case. He did the things he was accused of, and you, even as dumb as you are, know that. O.J. Simpson was found not guilty. I guess you believe that one? Actually don't answer. I couldn't care less what someone as stupid as you thinks about anything.
I’m not totally convinced OJ was guilty. I followed the case rather closely and there was definitely reasonable doubt. White people have since repeated over and over and over and over again that he was guilty so now everyone takes it for granted he was. As I stated, I wasn’t totally convinced. One thing I was totally convinced about was they tried to set him up. They could have tried to set up a guilty man. NO WAY do I believe he got rid of all those bloody clothes, shoes and the weapon yet leaves a freakin glove in his back yard. No way.
The Burghh wrote:
Smorbun wrote:
Shut up, you ignorant a$$. Acquittal was a given because of the extremely biased jury in this case. He did the things he was accused of, and you, even as dumb as you are, know that. O.J. Simpson was found not guilty. I guess you believe that one? Actually don't answer. I couldn't care less what someone as stupid as you thinks about anything.
I’m not totally convinced OJ was guilty. I followed the case rather closely and there was definitely reasonable doubt. White people have since repeated over and over and over and over again that he was guilty so now everyone takes it for granted he was. As I stated, I wasn’t totally convinced. One thing I was totally convinced about was they tried to set him up. They could have tried to set up a guilty man. NO WAY do I believe he got rid of all those bloody clothes, shoes and the weapon yet leaves a freakin glove in his back yard. No way.
Then you are a fool. He had motive, opportunity, and he basically confessed in that stupid book of his "If I did it".
Smorbun wrote:
The Burghh wrote:
I’m not totally convinced OJ was guilty. I followed the case rather closely and there was definitely reasonable doubt. White people have since repeated over and over and over and over again that he was guilty so now everyone takes it for granted he was. As I stated, I wasn’t totally convinced. One thing I was totally convinced about was they tried to set him up. They could have tried to set up a guilty man. NO WAY do I believe he got rid of all those bloody clothes, shoes and the weapon yet leaves a freakin glove in his back yard. No way.
Then you are a fool. He had motive, opportunity, and he basically confessed in that stupid book of his "If I did it".
And the glove did fit. There were tight-fitting gloves, and since they were evidence, he had to wear rubber surgeon-type gloves when trying them on. Now go try doing that with a tight-fitting pair of gloves you own. Guess why, you won't be able to put the gloves you own on. Why is that? Because your hands have body oils when help the gloves slip on. And rubber gloves are high-friction. It doesn't work, and I was always surprise that that prosecutors never figured that out.
Smorbun wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
The legal and formal certification of the innocence of a person who has been charged with a crime. Acquittals in fact take place when a jury finds a verdict of not guilty. Acquittals in law take place by operation of law such as when a person has been charged as an Accessory to the crime of Robbery and the principal has been acquitted.
Shut up, you ignorant a$$. Acquittal was a given because of the extremely biased jury in this case. He did the things he was accused of, and you, even as dumb as you are, know that. O.J. Simpson was found not guilty. I guess you believe that one? Actually don't answer. I couldn't care less what someone as stupid as you thinks about anything.
You have so much anger. Why so much anger? I never did anything to you, yet you have so much anger to me. Even so, I don't have any anger to you. In fact, I love you and hope you have a wonderful weekend. God bless you and I love you.
Smorbun wrote:
The Burghh wrote:
I’m not totally convinced OJ was guilty. I followed the case rather closely and there was definitely reasonable doubt. White people have since repeated over and over and over and over again that he was guilty so now everyone takes it for granted he was. As I stated, I wasn’t totally convinced. One thing I was totally convinced about was they tried to set him up. They could have tried to set up a guilty man. NO WAY do I believe he got rid of all those bloody clothes, shoes and the weapon yet leaves a freakin glove in his back yard. No way.
Then you are a fool. He had motive, opportunity, and he basically confessed in that stupid book of his "If I did it".
I’m not going to rehash the OJ case but I just know there was reasonable doubt. It was a racial thing....White folks were so “butt hurt” OJ beat the charge they have never gotten over it. If feel the same way about the Rodney King case. How in the world could that white jury AND many other white people look at the video and conclude that it wasn’t unreasonable force. They beat the living sh*t out of him with batons and white people said he resisted, smh.
Why didn’t white folks cry and go crazy when Robert Blake got away with killing his wife? We all know the answer.
Sally Vix wrote:
...
^ Pathetic, ignorant troll.
By the way, if the Rodney King beating happen today, I would bet my life Trump and the vast majority of his supporters would side with the police. No doubt in my mind at all!!!
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trump black support increasing:
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/dec/23/black-voters-abandoned-democrats-warm-donald-trump/?utm_source=GOOGLE&utm_medium=cpc&utm_id=chacka&utm_campaign=TWT+-+DSAhttps://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-thanks-kanye-for-doubling-his-black-support
LOLz
The Burghh wrote:
Smorbun wrote:
Shut up, you ignorant a$$. Acquittal was a given because of the extremely biased jury in this case. He did the things he was accused of, and you, even as dumb as you are, know that. O.J. Simpson was found not guilty. I guess you believe that one? Actually don't answer. I couldn't care less what someone as stupid as you thinks about anything.
I’m not totally convinced OJ was guilty. I followed the case rather closely and there was definitely reasonable doubt. White people have since repeated over and over and over and over again that he was guilty so now everyone takes it for granted he was. As I stated, I wasn’t totally convinced. One thing I was totally convinced about was they tried to set him up. They could have tried to set up a guilty man. NO WAY do I believe he got rid of all those bloody clothes, shoes and the weapon yet leaves a freakin glove in his back yard. No way.
WTF... this kind of thinking takes some convoluted brainwashing and logic twist. OJ had it written on his forehead since the beginning and everything detail fit the crime. They fkn caught him fleeing with a fake mustache and a bag of money.... holy fk. It was so obvious that the defense used it to cast doubt on the culpability.
Sally Vix wrote:
The legal and formal certification of the innocence of a person who has been charged with a crime. Acquittals in fact take place when a jury finds a verdict of not guilty. Acquittals in law take place by operation of law such as when a person has been charged as an Accessory to the crime of Robbery and the principal has been acquitted.
^dumba$$ trying but failing miserably to sound smart
Sally Vix wrote:
Smorbun wrote:
Shut up, you ignorant a$$. Acquittal was a given because of the extremely biased jury in this case. He did the things he was accused of, and you, even as dumb as you are, know that. O.J. Simpson was found not guilty. I guess you believe that one? Actually don't answer. I couldn't care less what someone as stupid as you thinks about anything.
You have so much anger. Why so much anger? I never did anything to you, yet you have so much anger to me. Even so, I don't have any anger to you. In fact, I love you and hope you have a wonderful weekend. God bless you and I love you.
I have no anger. You are just stupid.
Trollminator wrote:
The Burghh wrote:
I’m not totally convinced OJ was guilty. I followed the case rather closely and there was definitely reasonable doubt. White people have since repeated over and over and over and over again that he was guilty so now everyone takes it for granted he was. As I stated, I wasn’t totally convinced. One thing I was totally convinced about was they tried to set him up. They could have tried to set up a guilty man. NO WAY do I believe he got rid of all those bloody clothes, shoes and the weapon yet leaves a freakin glove in his back yard. No way.
WTF... this kind of thinking takes some convoluted brainwashing and logic twist. OJ had it written on his forehead since the beginning and everything detail fit the crime. They fkn caught him fleeing with a fake mustache and a bag of money.... holy fk. It was so obvious that the defense used it to cast doubt on the culpability.
Because he was running doesn’t mean he was guilty. I don’t know how old you are but I watched the trial in real time on court tv. You sound like you just read about it years later. I’m done.....it’s old news. Let’s agree to disagree.