Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

I hear you but the latest info goes against your argument. It says, among other things, that a former Ukraine prosecutor indeed *had* found biden crimes and he wanted to come to the US to tell us about them. Maybe Spanky was just trying to help him get here to root out american corruption overseas.

Source for that? We've been hearing about the ex-prosecutor but that he was just disgruntled and had unsubstantiated claims about Barisma. Were these supposed crimes committed by Biden or by Barisma? The covert nature of getting Rudy to go behind the scenes with his guys carrying bags of cash tells me it is all very far fetched. Why try to get to the bottom of something like that covertly and why not just open an official investigation citing potential corruption by the former administration?

Trollminator wrote:

Pete last night:

"I'm ready to take on Donald Trump because when he gets to the tough talk and the chest-thumping, he'll have to stand next to an American war veteran and explain how he pretended bone spurs made him ineligible to serve," he said, referencing how Trump avoided the Vietnam War.

Delusional. Bootybutt will never be your nominee.

Trollminator wrote:

agip wrote:

I hear you but the latest info goes against your argument. It says, among other things, that a former Ukraine prosecutor indeed *had* found biden crimes and he wanted to come to the US to tell us about them. Maybe Spanky was just trying to help him get here to root out american corruption overseas.

Source for that? We've been hearing about the ex-prosecutor but that he was just disgruntled and had unsubstantiated claims about Barisma. Were these supposed crimes committed by Biden or by Barisma? The covert nature of getting Rudy to go behind the scenes with his guys carrying bags of cash tells me it is all very far fetched. Why try to get to the bottom of something like that covertly and why not just open an official investigation citing potential corruption by the former administration?

To add to this, the witness testimonies have been pointing to trump & co trying desperately to get Ukraine to open an investigation into Joe, but not because they actually believed there was any reason to. Why was Biden corruption only a thing after he announced he was running? I think the continued push even after the impeachment started has more to do with now trying to justify what they were trying to do. Would it really be that hard to find a crime committed by the former VP? Now if it's just his son that changes things a bit and if it's just Barisma in general well that would be a big nothing burger.

Delusional. Senile Quid Pro Joe is toast.

#Trumplandslide

KAG2020

Trollminator wrote:

agip wrote:

I hear you but the latest info goes against your argument. It says, among other things, that a former Ukraine prosecutor indeed *had* found biden crimes and he wanted to come to the US to tell us about them. Maybe Spanky was just trying to help him get here to root out american corruption overseas.

Source for that? We've been hearing about the ex-prosecutor but that he was just disgruntled and had unsubstantiated claims about Barisma. Were these supposed crimes committed by Biden or by Barisma? The covert nature of getting Rudy to go behind the scenes with his guys carrying bags of cash tells me it is all very far fetched. Why try to get to the bottom of something like that covertly and why not just open an official investigation citing potential corruption by the former administration?

Here's the Ukrainian prosecutor saying Joe Biden applied pressure to save his son. When the US ambassador wouldn't let that happen, what choice did Trump have but to fire her and go over his head to the president of Ukraine? Maybe spanks did the right thing.

WaPo:

The newly released documents also detail Giuliani’s involvement in trying to secure a U.S. visa for Lutsenko’s predecessor, Viktor Shokin, who has alleged that Biden asked Poroshenko to fire him because he was investigating the owner of Burisma at the time.

Biden has denied the allegation, saying he pushed for Shokin’s firing as part of U.S. anti-corruption policy toward Ukraine, consistent with a broad consensus among U.S. and European officials at the time that he was failing to reform the country’s corrupt judicial system. Shokin was fired, after Biden’s urging, in March 2016.

Parnas was hoping to bring Shokin to the United States to meet with Giuliani and record his claims against Biden, but the U.S. Embassy, then run by Yovanovitch, had blocked Shokin’s visa.

ack I misstated something. better:

Here's the Ukrainian prosecutor saying Joe Biden applied pressure to save his son. The prosecutor wanted to come to the US to publicize Joe's crimes, but the US ambassador wouldn't let that happen.

When the US ambassador wouldn't let the ukrainian prosecutor come to the US, what choice did Trump have but to fire her and go over his head to the president of Ukraine? To get him to tell teh truth about criminal joe. Maybe spanks did the right thing.

WaPo:

The newly released documents also detail Giuliani’s involvement in trying to secure a U.S. visa for Lutsenko’s predecessor, Viktor Shokin, who has alleged that Biden asked Poroshenko to fire him because he was investigating the owner of Burisma at the time.

Biden has denied the allegation, saying he pushed for Shokin’s firing as part of U.S. anti-corruption policy toward Ukraine, consistent with a broad consensus among U.S. and European officials at the time that he was failing to reform the country’s corrupt judicial system. Shokin was fired, after Biden’s urging, in March 2016.

Parnas was hoping to bring Shokin to the United States to meet with Giuliani and record his claims against Biden, but the U.S. Embassy, then run by Yovanovitch, had blocked Shokin’s visa.[/quote]

This is great news!!!!

Quite the contrast - Donald Trump signing today an historic trade agreement with China as unemployment is at 50-year lows, the stock market (all indexes) are at all-time highs and the economy is booming like nothing before while the sullen Nancy Pelosi introduces the 7 impeachment managers who look as sad as anyone can be. Can Dems not rejoice in how great the country is doing? Do they hate Trump so much that they can't say that he is presiding over an incredible economy?

[/quote]

Shokin is rediculously uncredible. He would say anything to salvage his reputation and obviously has a grudge against Biden.

Fattttty Bsa wrote:

Quite the contrast - Donald Trump signing today an historic trade agreement with China as unemployment is at 50-year lows, the stock market (all indexes) are at all-time highs and the economy is booming like nothing before while the sullen Nancy Pelosi introduces the 7 impeachment managers who look as sad as anyone can be. Can Dems not rejoice in how great the country is doing? Do they hate Trump so much that they can't say that he is presiding over an incredible economy?

Yep.

East Room was packed with farmers, senators and governors. etc. "It can't be done, tariffs don’t work, blah blah blah..." LMAO!! Dimwits

Trump wins again!

WH holds “briefing” with reporters over the phone. No mention of their defense team or the Parnas evidence.

Easy to see why they can’t handle an actual press conference.

Parnas & lawyer to appear on Rachel Maddow tonight!

jesseriley wrote:

Parnas & lawyer to appear on Rachel Maddow tonight!

Great! We can be assured that she will be an objective interviewer!

jesseriley wrote:

WH holds “briefing” with reporters over the phone. No mention of their defense team or the Parnas evidence.

Easy to see why they can’t handle an actual press conference.

The Senate trial about to begin. Fasten your seatbelts. Let's Get Ready to Rumble!!!

Why did the White House quit with press conferences? This is something that deeply troubles me. The White House needs to face the people.

Criticism of the China trade deals is that it’s designed as a bridge to the election, but it’s unenforceable with a longer-term downside. Are we surprised?

jesseriley wrote:

Criticism of the China trade deals is that it’s designed as a bridge to the election, but it’s unenforceable with a longer-term downside. Are we surprised?

The president just signed an historic trade agreement with China. He is doing his presidential duties. Can he do ANYTHING without the Libs/Dems saying he is doing so for political reasons? We have had this crap for 3 plus years. Let the dude run the government. Can you even let him do that??????!!!

Same issues as before: create problem; find way to take personal advantage of problem; partially “fix” problem, leaving it worse than before; repeat by creating another problem.

New book, “A Very Stable Genius,” out soon & being previewed. More fun stuff.

jesseriley wrote:

Same issues as before: create problem; find way to take personal advantage of problem; partially “fix” problem, leaving it worse than before; repeat by creating another problem.

Have we had a Benghazi during the Trump presidency? He eliminated the top terrorist in the world. Hillary was sleeping when the Benghazi slaughter went down. They begged her for more security. She scoffed at them. She was sleeping when the attack went down! Sleeping! Trump would never be sleeping if an embassy was attacked. Just like he took out the Iranian terrorist he would take out the bad people attacking the embassy.